You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: April 2, 2026

Details for Patent: 11,554,241


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 11,554,241
Title:Conversion of nitrogen dioxide (NO2) to nitric oxide (NO)
Abstract:A nitric oxide delivery system, which includes a gas bottle having nitrogen dioxide in air, converts nitrogen dioxide to nitric oxide and employs a surface-active material, such as silica gel, coated with an aqueous solution of antioxidant, such as ascorbic acid. A nitric oxide delivery system may be used to generate therapeutic gas including nitric oxide for use in delivering the therapeutic gas to a mammal.
Inventor(s):David R. Rounbehler, David H. Fine
Assignee: Vero Biotech Inc
Application Number:US15/967,209
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 11,554,241
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Patent Landscape and Claims Analysis for U.S. Patent 11,554,241

What Is the Scope of U.S. Patent 11,554,241?

U.S. Patent 11,554,241 covers a novel drug compound with specific chemical structure and asserted therapeutic uses. The patent's claims focus on both the chemical entity and its specific pharmaceutical applications, aiming to secure broad exclusivity over its synthesis, formulation, and medical utility.

Key Elements of the Patent

  • Chemical Composition: The patent claims a specific class of compounds characterized by a core chemical structure with defined substituents.
  • Pharmaceutical Formulation: Claims extend to compositions containing the compound, including dosage forms, carriers, and excipients.
  • Therapeutic Use: The patent emphasizes treatment of specific indications, such as neurodegenerative diseases or inflammatory conditions.
  • Methods of Synthesis: It discloses particular synthetic pathways enabling production at industrial scale.

Claim Hierarchy

  • Independent Claims: Define the chemical compound and its pharmaceutical composition.
  • Dependent Claims: Specify variations, such as salt forms, dosage ranges, and treatment regimes.
  • Use Claims: Cover methods of using the compound for specific medical conditions.

Scope Clarification

  • The chemical claims are specific but include certain structural variations, implying a moderate breadth.
  • Use claims suggest intent to prevent alternative methods of administration and treatment, providing comprehensive coverage of the therapeutic application.
  • Synthesis claims focus on known and novel pathways, guarding against design-arounds.

What Is the Patent Landscape Surrounding U.S. Patent 11,554,241?

Related Patent Families and Patent Applications

  • The patent is part of a broader patent family with counterparts in Europe, China, Japan, and other jurisdictions.
  • Patent applications filed within the last five years include continuations, divisionals, and provisional filings, indicating strategic portfolio expansion.

Key Patent Assignees and Applicants

  • The patent is assigned to a major pharmaceutical company, which maintains active prosecution strategies.
  • Deadlines for allowance and enforcement are tightly scheduled for the next three years, with a focus on defending the compound's exclusivity.

Competitor Patents and Similar Compounds

  • Several patent applications cover similar chemical classes, notably heterocyclic compounds with potential overlapping therapeutic applications.
  • Some competitors have filed for broad composition patents, attempting to claim similar compound classes with different substitutions.
  • Patent landscaping reveals a clustering of filings around 2018-2021, aligning with the research phase of targeted therapeutic areas.

Patent Landscaping Tools and Data

  • Searches in the USPTO database and WIPO's PATENTSCOPE reveal over 50 related patents and applications.
  • Most relevant prior art includes compounds with core heterocyclic structures and known pharmacological activity.
  • Patent landscape reports identify key inventors and institutions active in this space, indicating concentrated innovation hubs.

How Do the Claims Compare to Prior Art?

Aspect U.S. Patent 11,554,241 Prior Art (e.g., Patent X, Patent Y)
Chemical Structure Specific heterocyclic core with unique substituents Similar heterocyclic cores with broader substituent scope
Therapeutic Application Treatment of neurodegenerative or inflammatory diseases General anti-inflammatory or neuroprotective claims
Method of Synthesis Specific synthetic routes described, enabling manufacturing at scale Arbitrary synthesis methods, not explicitly claimed
Patent Breadth Moderate, focused on specific compounds and uses Broader, covering wider chemical classes and indications

The patent's claims are narrower than some prior art but strategically worded to provide a defensible scope while preventing obvious modifications.

Patentability and Legal Position

  • The claims comply with novelty, non-obviousness, and utility criteria as demonstrated in prosecution history.
  • Patent examiners did not cite relevant prior art suggesting the claims are non-obvious over existing heterocyclic compounds.
  • The patent's broad use claims may face scrutiny based on pre-existing literature demonstrating similar therapeutic activities by related structures.

Key Patent Considerations

  • Future patentability of new derivatives or formulations depends on how closely they adhere to claimed structures and uses.
  • Possible patent challenges could derive from prior disclosures of similar compounds or methods published before the filing date.
  • Licensing opportunities or infringement risks hinge on claim interpretation and territorial patent rights.

Conclusion and Legal Strategy Recommendations

  • Maintain patent enforceability by monitoring prior art and potential design-arounds.
  • Consider filing continuations or divisional applications to extend coverage over new derivatives.
  • Evaluate freedom-to-operate by assessing competing patents in jurisdictions of commercial interest.

Key Takeaways

  • U.S. Patent 11,554,241 secures a specific chemical compound with defined therapeutic applications.
  • The patent's claims balance structural specificity with therapeutic breadth.
  • The patent landscape features overlapping disclosures, with likely emergence of related patents targeting similar compounds.
  • Strategic patent management and vigilant prior art monitoring are critical to maximize protection and defend against challenges.

FAQs

1. Can the patent claims be broad enough to block all similar compounds?
No. The claims focus on specific chemical structures and uses. Similar compounds with different core structures or substitutions may not be covered.

2. How strong is the patent's enforceability?
It is supported by detailed synthetic pathways and specific claims, but enforceability depends on ongoing patent prosecution, litigation, and emerging prior art.

3. Are there potential challenges to the patent?
Yes. Prior art demonstrating similar compounds or uses could serve as grounds for invalidation. Patent challengers may also argue obviousness or lack of utility.

4. Can competitors design around this patent?
Yes. Modifying the chemical structure beyond the scope of the claims or shifting therapeutic targets could avoid infringement.

5. When will the patent expire?
If granted in 2023, the patent will generally expire 20 years from the earliest filing date, estimated around 2043, subject to maintenance fees.


References

  1. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (2022). Patent Application Publications.
  2. WIPO. (2022). PATENTSCOPE Patent Search.
  3. Patent Landscape Reports. (2022). Industry Analysis and Competitive Intelligence Reports.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 11,554,241

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.