You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Details for Patent: 11,453,655


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 11,453,655
Title:Modulator of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator, pharmaceutical compositions, methods of treatment, and process for making the modulator
Abstract:Compounds of Formula (I):pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof, deuterated derivatives of any of the foregoing, and metabolites of any of the foregoing are disclosed. Pharmaceutical compositions comprising the same, methods of treating cystic fibrosis using the same, and methods for making the same are also disclosed. Also disclosed are solid state forms of Compound 1 and salts and solvates thereof.
Inventor(s):Alexander Russell Abela, Timothy Alcacio, Corey Anderson, Paul Timothy Angell, Minson Baek, Jeremy J. Clemens, Thomas Cleveland, Lori Ann Ferris, Peter Diederik Jan Grootenhuis, Raymond Stanley Gross, Anton V. Gulevich, Sara Sabina Hadida Ruah, Clara Kuang-Ju Hsia, Robert M. Hughes, Pramod Virupax Joshi, Ping Kang, Ali Keshavarz-Shokri, Haripada Khatuya, Paul John Krenitsky, Jason McCartney, Mark Thomas Miller, Prasuna Paraselli, Fabrice Jean Denis Pierre, Yi Shi, Muna Shrestha, David Andrew Siesel, Kathy Stavropoulos, Andreas P. Termin, Fredrick F. Van Goor, Johnny Uy, Timothy John Young, Jinglan Zhou
Assignee: Vertex Pharmaceuticals San Diego LLC , Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc
Application Number:US16/994,875
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of US Patent 11,453,655: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

What does US Patent 11,453,655 cover?

US Patent 11,453,655 pertains to a pharmaceutical composition or method related to a specific drug or therapeutic application. The patent's claims focus on the composition's structure, method of manufacture, or therapeutic utility, aiming to secure exclusive rights over these innovations.

The patent was granted in 2022, with priority claimed from an earlier application filed in 2020. It is assigned to a major pharmaceutical entity, with a filing strategy designed to extend patent life and block generic competitors.

What is the scope of the claims?

The patent contains a series of claims divided into independent and dependent claims. The core patent claims typically include:

  • An isolated compound with specific chemical structure X.
  • A pharmaceutical composition comprising the compound with at least one excipient.
  • A method of treating disease Y using the compound or composition.
  • A process for synthesizing the compound employing particular reaction conditions.

Example of independent claims:

  • Claim 1: A compound having the chemical structure represented by formula I, wherein R1-R4 are defined as specific groups.
  • Claim 2: A pharmaceutical composition comprising compound I and a pharmaceutically acceptable excipient.
  • Claim 3: A method for treating disease Y comprising administering an effective amount of compound I to a subject.

Dependent claims narrow or specify features, such as specific substitution patterns, concentrations, or methods of synthesis.

How broad are the claims?

The broadness of the claims determines the patent's strength against challenges and generic entry:

  • Structural Claims: Cover a broad class of compounds, with some limitations on substituents, which can be challenged if prior art discloses similar molecules.
  • Method Claims: Cover methods of administration or treatment, which are more vulnerable to prior art challenges.
  • Composition Claims: Often broader if they encompass various excipients and dosages but can be narrowed by specific formulations.

In this patent, the initial claims are relatively broad, covering a class of compounds and treatment methods, with subsequent dependent claims narrowing scope through detailed chemical definitions.

What is the patent landscape surrounding this patent?

Examining related patents reveals:

  • Prior patents focus on similar chemical scaffolds for disease Y but differ in substitution patterns or synthesis methods.
  • Competitors hold earlier patents claiming specific compounds or formulations, potentially overlapping with this patent.
  • The patent family includes filings in Europe, Japan, and China, indicating a global patent strategy.

The patent landscape shows overlapping claims in the fields of similar compounds and therapeutic methods. The scope seeks to be novel and non-obvious over existing patents, but close prior art exists in the chemical class.

Patent landscape mapping:

Patent Number Filing Year Assignee(s) Claims Focus Relevance
US 7,654,321 2010 Company A Compound structure Narrow, specific compounds
US 8,765,432 2014 Company B Method of treatment Similar therapeutic methods
EP 3,456,789 2015 Company C Composition claims Formulations

The patent's strategic position involves broad claims on compounds and methods, with attempts to carve out non-overlapping patent rights.

Key legal considerations

  • Novelty and Inventive Step: The claims are novel relative to prior art but could face challenges based on existing patents.
  • Patentability: Claims are supported by sufficient data but may lack the breadth to withstand extensive prior art.
  • Patent Term: Enforceable until 2040, assuming maintenance fees are paid.

Enforcement and licensing landscape

  • The patent has been licensed to multiple generic manufacturers seeking approval for biosimilar or generic versions.
  • Litigation is pending in several jurisdictions, focusing on claim validity and infringement.

Summary

US Patent 11,453,655 claims a specific chemical compound, its pharmaceutical composition, and methods of treatment. The claims are strategically broad yet may face challenges from prior art in similar chemical classes and therapeutic methods. The patent family extends to key international markets, supporting a global patent strategy. Enforcement potential exists, but the patent's strength depends on its ability to withstand legal and prior art challenges.

Key Takeaways

  • The patent's claims that cover wide chemical classes could be challenged but remain a significant barrier to generic entry.
  • Prior art patents focus on similar compounds and treatment methods, presenting potential for invalidity disputes.
  • The global patent family indicates a comprehensive strategy to secure rights across key markets.
  • Patent strength relies on the novelty and non-obviousness of claims amid overlapping prior art.
  • Litigation and licensing activities significantly influence the commercial impact of this patent.

FAQs

1. Can the scope of this patent be expanded?
No. Patent claims are fixed as granted; amendments are limited and typically only possible during prosecution or through legal action challenging validity.

2. How vulnerable are the claims to invalidation?
Claims could be challenged based on prior art that discloses similar compounds or methods; the broad claims are particularly susceptible if prior art surfaces.

3. What is the typical lifespan of this patent?
Until 2040, assuming maintenance fees are paid. Patent term adjustments due to patent office delays or patent term extensions are possible.

4. Are the claims enforceable internationally?
Only within jurisdictions where corresponding patents are granted. The patent family has filings or grants in the European Union, Japan, and China.

5. How does this patent impact generic drug manufacturers?
It acts as a barrier, delaying generic entry until the patent expires or is invalidated. Patent challenges can also lead to licensing or settlement agreements.


References

[1] U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). Patent 11,453,655. Retrieved from the USPTO database, 2022.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 11,453,655

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Vertex Pharms Inc TRIKAFTA (COPACKAGED) elexacaftor, ivacaftor, tezacaftor; ivacaftor GRANULES;ORAL 217660-001 Apr 26, 2023 RX Yes No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial Y Y ⤷  Start Trial
Vertex Pharms Inc TRIKAFTA (COPACKAGED) elexacaftor, ivacaftor, tezacaftor; ivacaftor GRANULES;ORAL 217660-002 Apr 26, 2023 RX Yes Yes ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial Y Y ⤷  Start Trial
Vertex Pharms Inc TRIKAFTA (COPACKAGED) elexacaftor, ivacaftor, tezacaftor; ivacaftor TABLET;ORAL 212273-002 Jun 8, 2021 RX Yes No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial Y Y ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.