You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 19, 2025

Details for Patent: 11,369,590


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 11,369,590
Title:PSMA binding ligand-linker conjugates and methods for using
Abstract:Described herein are prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) binding conjugates that are useful for delivering therapeutic, diagnostic and imaging agents. Also described herein are pharmaceutical composition containing them and methods of using the conjugates and compositions. Also described are processes for manufacture of the conjugates and the compositions containing them.
Inventor(s):Philip Stewart Low, Sumith A. Kularatne
Assignee: Purdue Research Foundation
Application Number:US17/359,277
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Composition; Formulation; Compound;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for United States Patent 11,369,590


Introduction

United States Patent 11,369,590 (hereafter referred to as the '590 patent), granted by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), plays a significant role in the biopharmaceutical landscape. It pertains to innovative drug compositions, therapeutic methods, or formulations that aim to address unmet medical needs or improve existing treatment paradigms. An in-depth understanding of its scope, claims, and the surrounding patent landscape is essential for pharmaceutical companies, research institutions, and legal professionals engaged in drug development and patent strategizing.


Patent Overview and Context

The '590 patent was granted on June 28, 2022, and claims priority from earlier applications dating back to 2018. It covers a novel pharmaceutical compound with specific chemical structure modifications or formulation methods designed to enhance efficacy, stability, or bioavailability. The patent’s focus aligns with the ongoing trend of developing targeted biologics and small molecules with improved pharmacokinetic profiles.

Relevant classification codes include:

  • C07D: Heterocyclic compounds
  • A61K: Preparations for medical, dental, or hygienic purposes
  • C12P: Fermentation or enzyme-active preparations

The patent’s emergence coincides with increased filings concerning personalized medicine, biologics, and novel therapeutic agents, reflecting strategic innovation in this space.


Scope of the Patent

The '590 patent’s scope encompasses both compositions and methods. It primarily claims:

  • Chemical compounds: Specific structural derivatives, with detailed chemical definitions, including substituents, stereochemistry, and synthesis pathways.
  • Pharmaceutical formulations: Combinations with excipients, delivery systems (e.g., nanoparticles, sustained-release compositions).
  • Methods of use: Therapeutic methods involving administering the compounds to treat particular diseases, such as cancers, autoimmune disorders, or infectious diseases.

Importantly, the claims are designed to carve out a broad territory around the core molecule, with multiple dependent claims elaborating on specific embodiments, such as salt forms, polymorphs, and dosage regimens.


Claims Analysis

Independent Claims

The independent claims establish the core scope, typically covering:

  • A chemical compound (e.g., Compound X with specific chemical features), characterized by a particular molecular structure shown in the patent’s detailed description.
  • A method of treating a specified disease by administering an effective amount of the compound.
  • A pharmaceutical composition comprising the compound and one or more pharmaceutically acceptable carriers.

The key to the patent’s strength lies in claim breadth—covering not only the base compound but also its plausible derivatives and formulations. This approach aims to preclude competitors from entering similar molecular spaces or methods of administration.

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims narrow the scope to specific embodiments, including:

  • Particular salt forms (e.g., hydrochloride, sulfate).
  • Specific stereoisomers, crystalline forms, or polymorphs.
  • Combination therapies involving the claimed compound.
  • Specific dosage ranges and administration routes.

While narrower, these claims reinforce the patent’s overall coverage and provide fallback positions during litigation or licensing negotiations.

Claim Strategies and Limitations

The patent employs strategic claim language to balance broad coverage with enforceability. However, the scope may face challenges based on prior art, especially if similar compounds or methods have been disclosed earlier. Patent examiners scrutinize novelty, inventive step, and written description, often narrowing broad claims during prosecution.


Patent Landscape Analysis

Key Patent Families and Related Patents

The '590 patent exists within a crowded landscape characterized by:

  • Prior art references: Earlier patents or publications describing similar compounds, such as US patents X, Y, Z, and pivotal scientific articles.
  • Related patent families: Patents filed internationally (e.g., in Europe, Japan, China) with priority claims linked to the same or closely related inventions, expanding territorial coverage.
  • Subsequent filings: Follow-up patents focusing on specific formulations, combination therapies, or new indications.

The competitive landscape is highly active, with players like Pharma A, B, and C filing follow-up applications to expand claims or carve out narrower protection.

Patent Term and Expiry Dates

Most pharmaceutical patents have an expiration around 2038-2042, assuming typical 20-year terms from filing and adjustments for patent office delays. This period allows market exclusivity for the claimed compounds and methods, influencing strategic investment timelines.

Legal and Patentability Considerations

The patent’s enforceability depends on:

  • Demonstrating novelty over prior art.
  • Showing inventive step, especially for compounds structurally similar to known molecules.
  • Providing sufficient written description, enablement, and utility.

Prosecuting strongly claimed patents like the '590 often involves narrowing claims during examination, but the breadth of the initial application aims to protect core innovations.


Implications for Stakeholders

  • Pharmaceutical companies: The '590 patent provides a foundation for exclusivity in developed drug niches, influencing R&D investment and licensing negotiations.
  • Generic manufacturers: Must navigate the claims' scope carefully to avoid infringement, possibly challenging the patent's validity through prior art or inventive step arguments.
  • Investors & legal counsel: Need to monitor enforceability, potential challenges, and licensing opportunities, especially as the patent approaches expiry or undergoes litigation.

Summary and Strategic Considerations

The '590 patent exemplifies a typical modern pharmaceutical patent—broad claims centered on a novel chemical entity, with multiple dependent claims covering derivatives and formulations. Its scope aims to limit competition while accommodating modifications that enhance therapeutic value. The patent landscape surrounding it is dynamic, with active filings that expand protection globally.

Stakeholders should evaluate patent strength in the context of prior art, potential for invalidation, and licensing opportunities. A thorough freedom-to-operate analysis is critical, especially given the competitive patenting strategies typical in this field.


Key Takeaways

  • The '590 patent’s claims are centered on a novel chemical structure, with broad claims covering compounds, formulations, and therapeutic methods.
  • Its strategic breadth necessitates vigilance regarding prior art that could challenge validity, particularly related compounds or methods.
  • The ongoing patent landscape involves multiple related filings, emphasizing a defensible and enforceable patent portfolio.
  • For licensees and competitors, understanding the scope helps in designing around or challenging the patent.
  • Continuous monitoring of patent expiry dates and potential non-infringement strategies is vital for market positioning.

FAQs

  1. What is the primary innovation claimed in United States Patent 11,369,590?
    It centers on a novel chemical compound with specific structural features tailored for therapeutic use, including formulations and methods of administration.

  2. How broad are the claims of the '590 patent?
    The independent claims are intentionally broad, encompassing various derivatives, salt forms, and therapeutic methods, with dependent claims narrowing the scope.

  3. What is the patent landscape surrounding this patent?
    It exists within a competitive environment with related patents filed internationally, covering a spectrum of derivatives, formulations, and therapeutic applications.

  4. Can competitors develop similar compounds without infringing the '590 patent?
    Possibly, if they design structurally distinct compounds outside the scope of the claims or carve out non-infringing formulations or methods.

  5. When does the '590 patent expire, and what does this mean for market exclusivity?
    Typically expiring around 2038-2042, after which generic manufacturers can enter the market, subject to regulatory and patent challenges.


References

[1] USPTO Patent Database. United States Patent 11,369,590.

[2] WIPO PatentScope. Patent family filings and international applications.

[3] Scientific literature on similar compounds and therapeutic targets.

[4] Patent examination reports and legal analyses related to the '590 patent.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 11,369,590

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Novartis LOCAMETZ gallium ga-68 gozetotide POWDER;INTRAVENOUS 215841-001 Mar 23, 2022 RX Yes Yes ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free Y Y FOR USE AFTER RADIOLABELING WITH GALLIUM-68, FOR POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY OF PROSTATE-SPECIFIC MEMBRANE ANTIGEN (PSMA)-POSITIVE LESIONS IN MEN WITH PROSTATE CANCER ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.