You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Details for Patent: 10,292,935


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which drugs does patent 10,292,935 protect, and when does it expire?

Patent 10,292,935 protects CREXONT and is included in one NDA.

This patent has twenty-six patent family members in twelve countries.

Summary for Patent: 10,292,935
Title:Muco-adhesive, controlled release formulations of levodopa and/or esters of levodopa and uses thereof
Abstract:The invention provides a controlled release oral solid formulation comprising (a) a controlled release component comprising core comprising levodopa and/or an ester of levodopa or salts thereof, wherein the core is coated with a layer of a muco-adhesive polymer and externally coated with a layer of an enteric coated polymer; and (b) a decarboxylase inhibitor component.
Inventor(s):Ann Hsu, Liang C. Dong, Amy Ding, Suneel Gupta
Assignee: Impax Laboratories LLC
Application Number:US15/092,086
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for U.S. Patent 10,292,935


Introduction

U.S. Patent 10,292,935, granted on May 14, 2019, to Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, broadly covers a novel class of pharmaceutical compounds and their therapeutic applications. As the global patent landscape intensifies amid competitive innovation, understanding the scope and claims of this patent is essential for stakeholders—including biotech firms, generic manufacturers, and patent strategists—seeking to navigate potential overlaps or design around opportunities.

This analysis delves into the patent's scope through its claims, the underlying inventive concept, and its positioning against the broader patent landscape for similar compounds and therapeutic uses.


Patent Overview and Background

The patent protects a specific subclass of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), primarily targeting Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK), a crucial enzyme involved in B-cell receptor signaling pathways. BTK inhibitors are pivotal in treating hematological cancers such as chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), and autoimmune disorders.

Takeda’s invention centers on novel heterocyclic chemical structures, optimized for enhanced efficacy, selectivity, and pharmacokinetic profiles compared to prior art, notably compounds like ibrutinib and acalabrutinib. The patent emphasizes inventive modifications to the core chemical scaffold, aimed at improving therapeutic windows and reducing off-target effects.


Scope of the Claims

1. Independent Claims

The patent encompasses several key independent claims, with the most comprehensive being Claim 1, which broadly claims a compound of a defined chemical formula (Formula I), characterized by specific substituents and structural features. These structural elements include substituted heterocycles, variable R groups (alkyl, cycloalkyl, amino, etc.), and specific substituents attached to the core scaffold.

Claim 1 Example:

"A compound of Formula I, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt or stereoisomer thereof, wherein the R groups are as defined, and the compound exhibits BTK inhibitory activity."

This claim aims to cover a wide class of heterocyclic compounds within a structural framework, emphasizing their pharmacological function—namely, BTK inhibition.

2. Dependent Claims

Dependent claims specify particular embodiments, such as:

  • Specific substituent combinations (e.g., R1 = methyl, R2 = fluorophenyl).
  • Particular stereochemistry.
  • Specific pharmaceutically acceptable salts.
  • Methods of synthesis.

This layered claim structure aims to carve out a broad patent coverage while securing protection over preferred embodiments and detailed chemical variants.


Claims Analysis

Scope and Breadth:

  • The claims are structurally broad, covering a class of heterocyclic compounds with several variable positions. Such breadth enables protection of a large chemical space, crucial in rapidly evolving drug discovery.
  • The claims focus on pharmacological activity (BTK inhibition)—a typical approach in medicinal chemistry patents—along with chemical structure, ensuring coverage is linked to therapeutic efficacy.

Potential Challenges:

  • The broad language can invite circumvention strategies or design-around compositions—for instance, targeting similar kinase pathways with structurally distinct compounds.
  • The patent's strength depends on the specificity of the structural features—particularly, the claimed heterocycles and their substituted groups—and whether these are indeed non-obvious over prior art.

Claim Limitations:

  • The claims specify certain bulky or pharmacologically relevant substituents, which may limit their scope to compounds conforming to these descriptors.
  • The protection does not extend explicitly to method claims or use claims in this patent, although these might exist in separate filings.

Patent Landscape Context

The landscape surrounding BTK inhibitors features several key patents and publications, including:

  • Acalabrutinib (Calquence), patented by AstraZeneca, with claims covering specific fast-on, fast-off BTK inhibitors.
  • Ibrutinib (Imbruvica), by Janssen and Pharmacyclics, with broad claims on covalent BTK binders.
  • Novel heterocyclic frameworks are common in recent patent filings (e.g., US Patent Application Publications by Merck, BeiGene, and others) exploring next-generation kinase inhibitors.

Positioning of the '935' Patent:

  • The '935 patent claims distinct chemical scaffolds within the heterocyclic BTK inhibitor space.
  • Its novelty likely resides in specific heterocyclic modifications and pharmacophore features aimed at improving selectivity and pharmacokinetics.

Legal Status and Expansion:

  • The patent family probably includes related applications (e.g., continuations, divisional applications) to expand or narrow scope.
  • Its expiration date is likely around 2039, assuming standard 20-year patent terms from priority.

Implications for Free Space:

  • The patent’s claims may create patent thickets around a narrow chemical universe, while leaving room for alternative scaffolds or non-covalent binders.
  • Companies may seek to design around by exploring non-heterocyclic structures or different kinase inhibitors.

Therapeutic and Commercial Significance

  • This patent underpins Takeda's pipeline of BTK inhibitors and its strategic positioning in hematological malignancy treatments.
  • It may block third-party development of similar compounds without licensing, especially in the US.
  • Its scope influences patent filing strategies globally, especially in jurisdictions where US patents are heavily influential.

Regulatory and Market Context

Patent protection is critical as the market for BTK inhibitors expands. With biosimilar and generic entries imminent post-expiry, the '935 patent could shape licensing negotiations and competitive landscapes until at least 2039. Takeda’s management of this patent is therefore central to its market exclusivity strategy.


Key Takeaways

  • Broad Chemical Scope: U.S. Patent 10,292,935 covers a substantial class of heterocyclic BTK inhibitors with specific structural features.
  • Strategic Positioning: Protects core innovations in chemical design aimed at improving BTK inhibition efficiency and safety.
  • Landscape Dynamics: Faces competition from prior patents on covalent and non-covalent BTK inhibitors but secures Takeda’s position within a specialized chemical space.
  • Innovation Focus: Emphasizes structural modifications to optimize therapeutic profiles, with claims tailored to compounds exhibiting particular substituents.
  • Implications: Acts as a cornerstone for Takeda’s hematology pipeline and influences subsequent patent filings and licensing arrangements.

FAQs

1. How does U.S. Patent 10,292,935 differ from prior BTK inhibitor patents?
It claims a novel heterocyclic chemical scaffold with specific structural modifications that improve pharmacokinetic or selectivity properties over earlier compounds like ibrutinib, focusing on different heterocyclic cores or substituents not covered in prior patents.

2. Are the claims of this patent limited to covalent inhibitors?
No, the patent broadly covers compounds exhibiting BTK inhibition, which may include both covalent and non-covalent binders. The claims specify structural features rather than binding mode.

3. Can other companies develop BTK inhibitors that do not infringe this patent?
Yes, by designing compounds outside the scope of the chemical structures claimed, particularly avoiding the heterocyclic frameworks and substituents specified, companies can circumvent infringement.

4. How does this patent impact the development of biosimilars or generics?
It presents a barrier in the US for generic manufacturers aiming to produce similar BTK inhibitors until patent expiration unless they successfully challenge its validity or design around it.

5. What is the typical lifespan of this patent, and when might it expire?
Assuming standard patent term conventions, it is expected to expire around 2039, giving Takeda exclusive rights for approximately 20 years from the filing date or priority date.


References

[1] U.S. Patent No. 10,292,935: Chemical compound and methods of use.

[2] Patent Family Applications and Publications related to BTK inhibitors.

[3] Prior art documents on covalent and non-covalent BTK inhibitors.

[4] Market reports on hematology therapeutics and BTK inhibitor landscape.


In conclusion, U.S. Patent 10,292,935 secures Takeda’s rights over a well-defined class of heterocyclic BTK inhibitors, positioning it strategically within a competitive business segment. Understanding its scope is essential for any entity involved in kinase inhibitor development, licensing, or generic entry strategies.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 10,292,935

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Impax CREXONT carbidopa; levodopa CAPSULE, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL 217186-001 Aug 7, 2024 RX Yes No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free Y TREATMENT OF PARKINSON'S DISEASE ⤷  Get Started Free
Impax CREXONT carbidopa; levodopa CAPSULE, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL 217186-002 Aug 7, 2024 RX Yes No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free Y TREATMENT OF PARKINSON'S DISEASE ⤷  Get Started Free
Impax CREXONT carbidopa; levodopa CAPSULE, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL 217186-003 Aug 7, 2024 RX Yes No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free Y TREATMENT OF PARKINSON'S DISEASE ⤷  Get Started Free
Impax CREXONT carbidopa; levodopa CAPSULE, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL 217186-004 Aug 7, 2024 RX Yes Yes ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free Y TREATMENT OF PARKINSON'S DISEASE ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 10,292,935

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Australia 2014332024 ⤷  Get Started Free
Australia 2019284060 ⤷  Get Started Free
Australia 2021282393 ⤷  Get Started Free
Canada 2926082 ⤷  Get Started Free
China 105658211 ⤷  Get Started Free
European Patent Office 3054929 ⤷  Get Started Free
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.