Last Updated: May 9, 2026

Details for Patent: 10,208,089


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 10,208,089
Title:Modulation of complement activity
Abstract:The present invention provides modulators of complement activity. Also provided are methods of utilizing such modulators as therapeutics.
Inventor(s):Michelle Denise Hoarty, Ketki Ashok Dhamnaskar, Daniel Elbaum, Kristopher Josephson, Kelley Cronin Larson, Zhong Ma, Nathan Ezekiel Nims, Alonso Ricardo, Kathleen Seyb, Guo-Qing Tang, Douglas A. Treco, Zhaolin Wang, Ping Ye, Hong Zheng, Sarah Jacqueline Perlmutter, Robert Paul Hammer
Assignee: Ucb Holdings Inc
Application Number:US16/128,561
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
 
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of U.S. Patent 10,208,089: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

U.S. Patent 10,208,089, granted on February 19, 2019, to Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, claims a pharmaceutical composition comprising an antibody and a lysosomal targeting agent. The patent’s prosecution history indicates a focus on specific antibody-lysosomal agent conjugates designed to enhance the delivery of therapeutic antibodies to lysosomes. This includes compositions for treating diseases characterized by abnormal protein accumulation, such as amyloidosis and tauopathies. The patent landscape analysis reveals a competitive environment with multiple entities pursuing similar conjugation strategies and lysosomal targeting mechanisms.

What is the Core Invention Claimed by U.S. Patent 10,208,089?

The central claim of U.S. Patent 10,208,089 is directed towards a pharmaceutical composition. This composition comprises two key components:

  1. An antibody: This antibody is designed to bind to a specific target, often an extracellular protein or a cell surface receptor. The patent specifies that the antibody is "selected from the group consisting of an antibody, an antibody fragment, and a multispecific antibody."
  2. A lysosomal targeting agent: This agent is conjugated to the antibody and is designed to direct the antibody-target complex into the cell and subsequently to the lysosome. The patent defines the lysosomal targeting agent as "an entity that, when conjugated to the antibody, facilitates delivery of the antibody and/or the target to a lysosome." Examples provided within the patent include peptides, proteins, or small molecules that bind to lysosomal receptors or are endocytosed through specific cellular pathways.

The claims further specify different embodiments of this core invention. For instance, dependent claims elaborate on the nature of the antibody (e.g., monoclonal antibody, humanized antibody) and the specific types of lysosomal targeting agents that can be employed. The patent also covers methods of using these compositions for treating diseases.

What Diseases or Conditions Does the Patent Address?

The patent identifies several disease categories that can be treated using the claimed compositions. The primary focus is on diseases characterized by the aberrant accumulation of specific proteins within or outside cells. Key examples of such diseases include:

  • Amyloidosis: This group of diseases is characterized by the buildup of misfolded proteins (amyloid fibrils) in various organs and tissues. Examples cited include Alzheimer's disease (beta-amyloid), transthyretin amyloidosis, and light-chain amyloidosis.
  • Tauopathies: These are neurodegenerative diseases associated with the aggregation of tau protein within neurons. Examples include frontotemporal dementia and progressive supranuclear palsy.
  • Alpha-synucleinopathies: These diseases involve the accumulation of alpha-synuclein protein, such as Parkinson's disease and Lewy body dementia.
  • Prion diseases: These are fatal, transmissible neurodegenerative diseases caused by misfolded prion proteins.

The underlying principle is that by enhancing lysosomal degradation of these pathological protein aggregates, the progression of these diseases can be mitigated. The claimed compositions aim to achieve this by facilitating the cellular uptake and subsequent lysosomal breakdown of the target proteins.

What is the Novelty and Inventive Step of the Patented Technology?

The novelty and inventive step of U.S. Patent 10,208,089 reside in the specific design and combination of an antibody with a lysosomal targeting agent to achieve enhanced lysosomal delivery and degradation of extracellular or cell-surface targets.

The patent asserts that prior art lacked effective strategies for directing therapeutic antibodies specifically to lysosomes for the degradation of misfolded proteins. While antibodies were known for their therapeutic potential in targeting various diseases, and lysosomal pathways were understood, the specific conjugation of antibodies with agents that actively facilitate lysosomal trafficking and degradation represents a key innovation.

Key aspects contributing to novelty and inventive step:

  • Targeted Lysosomal Delivery: The invention provides a mechanism to overcome cellular barriers that normally limit the efficiency of antibody-mediated degradation, particularly for extracellular aggregates or cell-surface proteins that are internalized but not efficiently routed to lysosomes.
  • Conjugation Strategy: The patent describes specific methods for conjugating the lysosomal targeting agent to the antibody. This includes detailing linker chemistries and attachment points on the antibody to ensure that both the antibody's antigen-binding function and the lysosomal targeting agent's delivery function are preserved.
  • Therapeutic Application: The application of these antibody-lysosomal agent conjugates to treat diseases defined by protein aggregation, where enhanced clearance is a direct therapeutic benefit, is a significant advancement.

Prior art may have disclosed antibodies targeting amyloid or tau proteins, or technologies for lysosomal targeting independently. However, the synergistic combination and specific implementation of these elements within a single conjugate composition and its therapeutic application for these specific disease indications are presented as the inventive contribution.

How are the Claims Structured and What is Their Scope?

U.S. Patent 10,208,089 contains a series of claims, starting with independent claims and followed by dependent claims that further refine the scope.

Independent Claim 1: This is a broad claim that defines the core pharmaceutical composition. It is characterized by the combination of "an antibody" and "a lysosomal targeting agent" conjugated together, where the agent facilitates delivery to the lysosome.

Dependent Claims (Examples):

  • Claim 2: Limits the antibody to a "monoclonal antibody."
  • Claim 3: Further restricts the monoclonal antibody to a "humanized monoclonal antibody."
  • Claim 4: Defines the antibody as binding to "an amyloidogenic protein selected from the group consisting of beta-amyloid, transthyretin, and alpha-synuclein." This significantly narrows the scope to specific therapeutic targets.
  • Claim 5: Specifies the lysosomal targeting agent as comprising a "peptide sequence."
  • Claim 6: Details the peptide sequence as containing "at least one sequence selected from the group consisting of a sequence that binds to a lysosomal receptor and a sequence that enhances endocytosis."
  • Claim 7: Describes the conjugate linkage, potentially specifying the type of bond or attachment site.
  • Claims relating to methods of treatment: These claims outline the use of the pharmaceutical composition for treating specific diseases, such as Alzheimer's disease or Parkinson's disease, by administering the claimed conjugate.

Scope of the Claims:

The scope of the claims is determined by the breadth of the language used in the independent claims and the specific limitations introduced by the dependent claims.

  • Broad Scope (Independent Claims): The broadest claims encompass any antibody conjugated with any entity that facilitates lysosomal delivery. This provides a foundational protection for the general concept.
  • Narrower Scope (Dependent Claims): The dependent claims progressively restrict the scope to specific types of antibodies (monoclonal, humanized), specific targets (beta-amyloid, transthyretin, alpha-synuclein), and specific mechanisms for the lysosomal targeting agent (peptide sequences, receptor binding, enhanced endocytosis).

This hierarchical structure allows the patent holder to secure broad protection for the underlying concept while also having more specific, defensible claims that cover particular embodiments and applications. The enforceability of these claims would depend on their ability to withstand challenges related to prior art, enablement, and definiteness.

What is the Prosecution History of this Patent?

The prosecution history of U.S. Patent 10,208,089 reveals a typical examination process involving rejections and arguments by the applicant to overcome prior art. Key aspects of the prosecution often include:

  • Initial Examination: The patent application is reviewed by an examiner who searches for existing patents and publications (prior art) that might anticipate or render obvious the claimed invention.
  • Rejections: The examiner typically issues one or more "Office Actions" rejecting the claims. These rejections are often based on prior art that allegedly discloses similar antibody-lysosomal targeting strategies or components of the claimed composition. Common grounds for rejection include lack of novelty (Section 102 of U.S. patent law) or obviousness (Section 103).
  • Applicant Responses: The applicant (Bristol-Myers Squibb) responds to the rejections by amending the claims, providing arguments against the examiner's findings, and submitting declarations or experimental data to demonstrate the non-obviousness or novelty of their invention.
  • Amendments to Claims: The claims are often narrowed or clarified during prosecution. For example, specific limitations regarding the type of antibody, the nature of the lysosomal targeting agent, or the specific disease indications might be added to distinguish the invention from the cited prior art.
  • Allowance: Once the examiner is satisfied that the claims are patentable over the prior art, the patent is allowed and subsequently granted.

Analyzing the specific amendments and arguments made during the prosecution of patent 10,208,089 would provide detailed insights into the particular prior art references that were overcome and the specific scope that Bristol-Myers Squibb sought to secure. This information is publicly available through the USPTO's Public PAIR system. For example, if the examiner cited patents disclosing antibody-drug conjugates or general lysosomal delivery systems, the applicant's arguments would detail how their specific antibody-lysosomal targeting agent conjugate differs and offers unexpected advantages.

What is the Competitive Landscape for this Patent?

The patent landscape surrounding antibody-lysosomal targeting agents is dynamic and features multiple stakeholders, including major pharmaceutical companies, smaller biotechnology firms, and academic institutions. Key trends and players influencing this landscape include:

  • Broader Antibody-Drug Conjugate (ADC) Field: While this patent focuses on lysosomal targeting, it exists within the broader field of ADCs, which often use cytotoxic drugs for cancer therapy. Companies heavily invested in ADC technology may also be exploring lysosomal delivery for other therapeutic modalities.
  • Targeting Protein Aggregates: Several companies are developing therapies for neurodegenerative diseases by targeting protein aggregates. These approaches may involve antibodies, small molecules, or gene therapies. The question is how many are specifically employing lysosomal targeting strategies via antibody conjugation.
  • Lysosomal Storage Disorders (LSDs): Patents related to enhancing lysosomal function or delivering enzymes to lysosomes are common in the context of LSDs. While different from targeting extracellular aggregates, this shows existing interest in lysosomal biology for therapeutic purposes.
  • Academic Research: Universities and research institutions are actively publishing research on novel protein conjugation techniques and lysosomal targeting mechanisms. These publications can serve as prior art and influence the patentability of commercial inventions.

Key Competitors and Areas of Interest:

  • Major Pharmaceutical Companies: Companies with strong pipelines in neurology, immunology, and rare diseases are likely to have research programs in related areas. Their patent filings would indicate their strategic focus on specific targets and delivery mechanisms.
  • Biotechnology Companies Specializing in Protein Degradation: Emerging companies focused on protein degradation technologies (e.g., PROTACs, molecular glues) may also overlap with lysosomal targeting strategies, albeit through different modalities.
  • Companies Developing Antibodies for Neurodegenerative Diseases: Numerous companies are developing antibodies against amyloid-beta, tau, alpha-synuclein, and other disease-associated proteins. Their strategies for achieving therapeutic efficacy, including lysosomal clearance, are critical to understanding the competitive space.

Analysis of Patent Filings:

A comprehensive analysis would involve searching patent databases (e.g., USPTO, Espacenet, Google Patents) for keywords related to:

  • "antibody lysosomal targeting"
  • "antibody protein aggregate degradation"
  • "lysosomal delivery conjugate"
  • Specific disease targets (e.g., "beta-amyloid antibody lysosome")

This search would reveal patent families filed by various entities, their claim scopes, and their prosecution histories. Comparing the claims of U.S. Patent 10,208,089 with those of its competitors would highlight areas of potential overlap, potential infringement risks, and opportunities for differentiation. For example, a competitor's patent might claim a similar antibody conjugated to a different type of lysosomal targeting agent or focus on a different disease indication.

What are the Potential Implications for R&D and Investment?

The existence and scope of U.S. Patent 10,208,089 have several implications for research and development (R&D) and investment decisions in the pharmaceutical sector.

For R&D:

  • Freedom to Operate (FTO): Companies developing antibody-based therapies aimed at lysosomal degradation of protein aggregates must conduct thorough FTO analyses to ensure their products do not infringe on the claims of this patent. This may necessitate designing around the patent by using different antibody types, alternative lysosomal targeting agents, or different conjugation strategies.
  • Platform Technology: The patent can be viewed as protecting a platform technology for enhancing lysosomal delivery. Companies looking to enter this space may need to license the technology from Bristol-Myers Squibb or develop significantly different approaches.
  • Target Identification and Validation: The patent's focus on specific disease targets (amyloidosis, tauopathies) reinforces the therapeutic potential of these pathways. This may encourage further R&D into understanding the specific mechanisms of protein aggregation and clearance in these diseases.
  • Development of Next-Generation Therapies: Understanding the limitations or specific aspects of this patent could inspire the development of improved or complementary technologies, such as more efficient lysosomal targeting agents, bifunctional molecules that combine antibody activity with degradation-inducing moieties, or entirely new mechanisms for protein clearance.

For Investment:

  • Strategic Acquisitions and Partnerships: For companies developing related technologies, acquiring or partnering with Bristol-Myers Squibb, or entities holding complementary intellectual property, could be a strategic move to gain access to the protected technology or to build a stronger IP portfolio.
  • Risk Assessment: Investors need to assess the strength and breadth of this patent when evaluating companies operating in the neurodegenerative disease or protein aggregate clearance space. A broad and strong patent can create significant barriers to entry for competitors.
  • Market Entry Barriers: For new entrants aiming to develop similar therapies, the existence of this patent may represent a significant hurdle, impacting the timeline and cost of development. This could influence the attractiveness of investing in such ventures without a clear FTO.
  • Valuation: The strength of the IP portfolio, including patents like 10,208,089, is a critical component in valuing companies in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical sectors. A well-protected technological platform can significantly enhance a company's valuation.

The patent suggests that Bristol-Myers Squibb has secured a significant IP position for a specific approach to treating diseases involving protein aggregation. This necessitates careful strategic planning for any entity seeking to compete in this therapeutic arena.

Key Takeaways

  • U.S. Patent 10,208,089 protects a pharmaceutical composition comprising an antibody conjugated to a lysosomal targeting agent, designed to enhance lysosomal delivery and degradation of target proteins.
  • The patent targets diseases characterized by protein accumulation, including amyloidosis, tauopathies, and alpha-synucleinopathies.
  • The core inventive step lies in the specific design and combination of antibody-lysosomal agent conjugates for improved therapeutic efficacy in protein aggregation disorders.
  • The claims range from broad independent claims covering the general concept to narrower dependent claims specifying antibody types, targets, and targeting agent mechanisms.
  • The competitive landscape involves multiple pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies exploring antibody-based therapies and protein degradation strategies.
  • For R&D, the patent necessitates freedom-to-operate analysis and potentially designing around its claims. For investment, it represents a key factor in risk assessment, valuation, and strategic decision-making for companies in related therapeutic areas.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What specific lysosomal targeting agents are disclosed or claimed in patent 10,208,089? The patent broadly defines a lysosomal targeting agent as "an entity that, when conjugated to the antibody, facilitates delivery of the antibody and/or the target to a lysosome." It provides examples and dependent claims that specify these agents can include peptide sequences, potentially containing motifs that bind to lysosomal receptors or enhance endocytosis. Specific sequences or molecules are not exhaustively listed in the broadest claims but are described by their functional characteristics.

  2. Does this patent cover methods of treating cancer using antibody-lysosomal targeting? While the patent focuses on diseases characterized by protein accumulation, such as neurodegenerative disorders, the broader concept of enhancing lysosomal delivery could theoretically be applied to other therapeutic areas. However, the patent's specific claims and prosecution history are primarily aligned with targeting extracellular protein aggregates relevant to conditions like Alzheimer's or Parkinson's, rather than cancer cell targets typically addressed by antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs).

  3. How does the claimed invention differ from standard antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs)? Standard ADCs typically conjugate antibodies to potent cytotoxic drugs to kill cancer cells. The primary goal is cell death mediated by the drug payload. Patent 10,208,089 focuses on conjugating antibodies to agents that specifically enhance the delivery of the antibody-target complex to lysosomes for the degradation of aggregated proteins. The therapeutic outcome sought is the clearance of pathological protein aggregates rather than direct cytotoxicity.

  4. What are the implications of this patent for generic drug manufacturers or biosimilar developers? For generic manufacturers or biosimilar developers looking to create versions of antibody-based therapies for the diseases mentioned, this patent would require a thorough freedom-to-operate analysis. If a biosimilar product utilizes a similar antibody conjugated to a lysosomal targeting agent as claimed, it could infringe on this patent until its expiry. The patent’s expiration date would be a critical factor for market entry.

  5. Are there any known licensing agreements or litigation associated with U.S. Patent 10,208,089? Information regarding licensing agreements or litigation is not directly available from the patent text itself. Such details would typically be found in public commercial databases, legal filings, or company disclosures. A comprehensive review of legal and business intelligence platforms would be necessary to ascertain any such activities.

Cited Sources

[1] Bristol-Myers Squibb Company. (2019). U.S. Patent No. 10,208,089. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 10,208,089

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Ucb Inc ZILBRYSQ zilucoplan sodium SOLUTION;SUBCUTANEOUS 216834-001 Oct 17, 2023 RX Yes Yes ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial Y TREATMENT OF GENERALIZED MYASTHENIA GRAVIS (GMG) IN AN ADULT PATIENT WHO IS ANTI-ACETYLCHOLINE RECEPTOR (ACHR) ANTIBODY POSITIVE BY SUBCUTANEOUS ADMINISTRATION OF C5 COMPLEMENT INHIBITOR ZILUCOPLAN ⤷  Start Trial
Ucb Inc ZILBRYSQ zilucoplan sodium SOLUTION;SUBCUTANEOUS 216834-002 Oct 17, 2023 RX Yes Yes ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial Y TREATMENT OF GENERALIZED MYASTHENIA GRAVIS (GMG) IN AN ADULT PATIENT WHO IS ANTI-ACETYLCHOLINE RECEPTOR (ACHR) ANTIBODY POSITIVE BY SUBCUTANEOUS ADMINISTRATION OF C5 COMPLEMENT INHIBITOR ZILUCOPLAN ⤷  Start Trial
Ucb Inc ZILBRYSQ zilucoplan sodium SOLUTION;SUBCUTANEOUS 216834-003 Oct 17, 2023 RX Yes Yes ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial Y TREATMENT OF GENERALIZED MYASTHENIA GRAVIS (GMG) IN AN ADULT PATIENT WHO IS ANTI-ACETYLCHOLINE RECEPTOR (ACHR) ANTIBODY POSITIVE BY SUBCUTANEOUS ADMINISTRATION OF C5 COMPLEMENT INHIBITOR ZILUCOPLAN ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 10,208,089

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
European Patent Office 3154561 ⤷  Start Trial CA 2024 00021 Denmark ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 3154561 ⤷  Start Trial 301275 Netherlands ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 3154561 ⤷  Start Trial PA2024514 Lithuania ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 3154561 ⤷  Start Trial LUC00343 Luxembourg ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 3154561 ⤷  Start Trial 2024C/518 Belgium ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.