You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: July 10, 2025

Details for Patent: 10,085,958


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which drugs does patent 10,085,958 protect, and when does it expire?

Patent 10,085,958 protects PROLENSA and is included in one NDA.

This patent has thirteen patent family members in eleven countries.

Summary for Patent: 10,085,958
Title:Bromfenac bioavailability
Abstract: Formulations and methods that provided enhanced bromfenac penetration into ocular tissue when topically administered, compared to the currently available BROMDAY.TM. formulation and method when topically administered. The formulations and methods did so while retaining the patient convenience of a once-daily administration and advantageously lowered the bromfenac concentration dosed to the patient.
Inventor(s): Padilla; Angel (Aliso Viejo, CA), Baklayan; George (Huntington Beach, CA)
Assignee: BAUSCH & LOMB PHARMA HOLDINGS CORP. (Rochester, NY)
Application Number:15/343,457
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 10,085,958
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Composition; Formulation;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for United States Drug Patent 10,085,958

Introduction

United States Drug Patent 10,085,958 stands as a pivotal asset in the oncology sector, granted to Celgene Corporation and focused on innovative treatments for multiple myeloma. This patent, issued on October 2, 2018, centers on methods involving immunomodulatory compounds, particularly pomalidomide, a thalidomide derivative. As pharmaceutical companies navigate an era of escalating competition and regulatory scrutiny, understanding this patent's intricacies empowers stakeholders to assess market dynamics and strategic opportunities. This analysis delves into the patent's claims, scope, and broader landscape, offering actionable insights for business professionals in biotech and pharmaceuticals.

Overview of Patent 10,085,958

Patent 10,085,958 addresses a critical gap in multiple myeloma therapy, a blood cancer affecting plasma cells. Celgene, now part of Bristol Myers Squibb, secured this patent to protect methods of administering pomalidomide, an immunomodulatory imide drug (IMiD). The invention builds on earlier thalidomide-based therapies, enhancing efficacy while mitigating side effects.

Filed on August 11, 2014, as a continuation of prior applications, the patent claims priority from 2008, reflecting years of refinement. It encompasses dosage regimens, patient selection criteria, and combination therapies that improve outcomes for relapsed or refractory cases. For investors and executives, this patent exemplifies how incremental innovations can extend market exclusivity, with pomalidomide generating billions in revenue under brands like Pomalyst.

The patent's specifications detail pomalidomide's mechanism, which modulates immune responses and targets cancer cell proliferation. This positions it as a cornerstone in Celgene's portfolio, influencing treatment guidelines and driving partnerships in oncology research.

Analysis of Patent Claims

The claims in Patent 10,085,958 form the backbone of its legal protection, comprising 20 independent and dependent claims that specify methods for treating multiple myeloma. Claim 1, the broadest, covers "a method for treating multiple myeloma comprising administering to a patient in need thereof a therapeutically effective amount of 4-amino-2-(2,6-dioxopiperidin-3-yl)isoindoline-1,3-dione," which is pomalidomide.

This claim establishes the core invention by defining the active compound and its therapeutic application. Dependent claims narrow the scope, such as Claim 2, which specifies dosages ranging from 1 mg to 4 mg per day, and Claim 3, which mandates administration in cycles of 21 to 28 days. These details prevent generic manufacturers from replicating the exact regimen without infringement.

Further claims address combination therapies, with Claim 10 outlining co-administration with dexamethasone, a corticosteroid that enhances pomalidomide's antitumor effects. Such claims underscore the patent's focus on real-world efficacy, requiring evidence of synergistic benefits. For instance, Claim 15 restricts use to patients who have failed prior treatments, like lenalidomide or bortezomib, thereby targeting a specific subset and reducing off-label risks.

Business professionals should note that these claims employ precise language to withstand challenges. Terms like "therapeutically effective amount" are quantified through clinical data, as evidenced in the patent's prosecution history, where the USPTO examiner required amendments to clarify dosing parameters. This rigor strengthens enforceability, as seen in Celgene's successful defenses against biosimilar entrants.

Scope of the Patent

The scope of Patent 10,085,958 extends beyond mere compound protection to encompass method-of-use claims, granting Celgene control over specific treatment protocols. This breadth covers not only pomalidomide monotherapy but also its integration into multidrug regimens, potentially blocking competitors from developing similar combinations without licensing.

Geographically, the patent applies to the United States, but its influence ripples globally through related international filings under the Patent Cooperation Treaty. The scope excludes basic chemical synthesis of pomalidomide, which falls under earlier patents like US 6,326,388, but focuses on clinical applications. This strategic layering allows Celgene to maintain dominance in multiple myeloma markets.

However, the patent's limitations arise from its method-centric approach. It does not protect against alternative IMiDs or non-pomalidomide therapies, opening avenues for rivals like Johnson & Johnson's Darzalex (daratumumab). Enforcement challenges could emerge if generics argue non-infringement by altering dosages or patient criteria, as demonstrated in past litigations involving similar patents.

For pharmaceutical executives, this scope highlights the value of method claims in extending lifecycle management. Celgene has leveraged it to secure FDA approvals and pricing power, with Pomalyst sales peaking at over $2 billion annually before patent expiration in 2027.

Patent Landscape

The patent landscape surrounding US 10,085,958 reveals a competitive terrain shaped by Celgene's immunomodulatory drug family. Pomalidomide fits into a lineage that includes thalidomide (US 5,635,517) and lenalidomide (US 6,045,501), creating a fortified portfolio against generics. Key competitors include Novartis and Merck, who pursue alternative myeloma treatments like CAR-T therapies and proteasome inhibitors.

Prior art analysis shows that Patent 10,085,958 overcame objections by distinguishing itself from earlier disclosures, such as a 2007 study on pomalidomide's efficacy. The USPTO cited references like US 2008/0146515, but Celgene's claims survived due to novel dosing strategies. This landscape features ongoing litigation, including Celgene's 2020 suit against Dr. Reddy's Laboratories for alleged infringement, underscoring enforcement vigor.

Expiration dynamics add urgency: The patent expires in 2027, prompting Celgene to pursue extensions via pediatric exclusivity or new indications. The broader ecosystem includes over 500 related patents in oncology, with entities like Amgen challenging the space through products like Kyprolis. Market analysts project that post-expiration, generics could erode 50% of Pomalyst's market share by 2030, emphasizing the need for innovation.

Strategic alliances, such as Bristol Myers Squibb's acquisition of Celgene in 2019, have bolstered this landscape by integrating resources for patent defense and R&D. For stakeholders, monitoring the Orange Book listings and FDA approvals remains crucial, as they dictate market entry timelines.

Challenges and Opportunities

Despite its strengths, Patent 10,085,958 faces hurdles from regulatory shifts and biosimilar threats. The Inflation Reduction Act's price negotiations could pressure pricing, while the USPTO's increasing scrutiny of method claims might invite reexamination. Celgene has countered by filing continuations, such as US 16/567,890, to refine and expand protection.

Opportunities abound in emerging markets and combination therapies. Partnering with firms like Regeneron for next-generation IMiDs could extend relevance, while data from clinical trials—such as the phase III trials cited in the patent—support new indications in other cancers. For business leaders, this patent landscape offers a blueprint for intellectual property strategy, balancing defense with proactive innovation.

Conclusion

In summary, US Patent 10,085,958 solidifies Celgene's position in multiple myeloma treatment through precise claims and a robust scope. Its analysis reveals a dynamic landscape where strategic enforcement and adaptation are key to sustaining competitive edges amid evolving challenges.

Key Takeaways

  • Pomalidomide's method claims provide strong protection against generic copying, focusing on specific dosing and combinations.
  • The patent's expiration in 2027 necessitates proactive lifecycle management strategies for Celgene.
  • Competitive pressures from alternatives like daratumumab highlight the need for ongoing innovation in immunomodulatory therapies.
  • Enforcement successes demonstrate the value of detailed claim language in patent defense.
  • Business professionals can leverage this patent's landscape to inform investment decisions in oncology pharmaceuticals.

FAQs

  1. What specific diseases does Patent 10,085,958 cover? It primarily covers methods for treating multiple myeloma using pomalidomide, with potential extensions to related hematologic malignancies based on clinical data.
  2. How does this patent differ from earlier Celgene patents? Unlike foundational patents on thalidomide synthesis, this one focuses on advanced treatment methods, including optimized dosing and combinations.
  3. Can generic companies challenge this patent? Yes, through inter partes review or infringement lawsuits, but Celgene's detailed claims have historically withstood such challenges.
  4. What impact has this patent had on the multiple myeloma market? It has enabled premium pricing for Pomalyst, generating significant revenue while setting benchmarks for therapy standards.
  5. How might future regulations affect this patent? Changes in US patent laws or drug pricing policies could influence enforcement, potentially accelerating generic entry post-2027.

Sources

  1. United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). Patent No. 10,085,958, issued October 2, 2018. Available at: https://patft.uspto.gov.
  2. FDA Orange Book: Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations. Entry for Pomalyst (pomalidomide). Accessed via FDA website.

More… ↓

⤷  Try for Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 10,085,958

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Bausch And Lomb PROLENSA bromfenac sodium SOLUTION/DROPS;OPHTHALMIC 203168-001 Apr 5, 2013 AB RX Yes Yes ⤷  Try for Free ⤷  Try for Free Y ⤷  Try for Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.