Litigation Details for Shire Orphan Therapies LLC v. Fresenius Kabi USA, LLC (D. Del. 2015)
✉ Email this page to a colleague
Shire Orphan Therapies LLC v. Fresenius Kabi USA, LLC (D. Del. 2015)
| Docket | ⤷ Try a Trial | Date Filed | 2015-11-29 |
| Court | District Court, D. Delaware | Date Terminated | 2018-06-05 |
| Cause | 35:271 Patent Infringement | Assigned To | Richard Gibson Andrews |
| Jury Demand | None | Referred To | |
| Patents | 10,030,059; 10,036,037; 10,036,054; 10,041,044; 10,046,056; 10,046,058; 10,047,033; 8,039,010; 8,048,017; 9,005,056; 9,020,056; 9,024,034; 9,040,034; 9,040,039; 9,056,052; 9,056,057 | ||
| Link to Docket | External link to docket | ||
Small Molecule Drugs cited in Shire Orphan Therapies LLC v. Fresenius Kabi USA, LLC
The small molecule drugs covered by the patents cited in this case are ⤷ Try a Trial and ⤷ Try a Trial .
Biologic Drugs cited in Shire Orphan Therapies LLC v. Fresenius Kabi USA, LLC
The biologic drugs covered by the patents cited in this case are ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , and ⤷ Try a Trial .
Details for Shire Orphan Therapies LLC v. Fresenius Kabi USA, LLC (D. Del. 2015)
| Date Filed | Document No. | Description | Snippet | Link To Document |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-02-28 | 107 | addressed was, is Claim 14 of the 10:47:33 6 '333 patent an obvious variant of Claim 1 of… another patent that claims the same discovery as the '333 09:07:39 13 patent, the same… 14 contained in this patent is contained in the '7,803 patent 09:07:53 15 that Shire…That patent already expired. Shire is not 09:08:01 17 entitled to the second patent but…x27;333 patent was filed first. 09:08:23 23 Why did the '7,803 patent issue | External link to document | |
| 2018-02-28 | 108 | Did I read that correctly? 09:05:56 12 A. You did. 09:05:58 13…exhibit Knolle 5, the '333 patent, which 10:13:30 9 is the patent in suit in this case. …participate when those patents were being 11:00:55 23 prosecuted at the Patent Office? 11:00:57…How many patents issued from the 11 applications in 11:19:11 5 the '333 patent prosecution…:14 6 A. Only one patent issued, the '333 patent. 11:19:17 7 Q. And | External link to document | |
| 2018-02-28 | 109 | you look at 3.31, if you go to these 10:30:59 17 patents, position eight here is called Z. …the '993 patent, 11:55:33 20 the '613 patent and the '963 patent. Right…'333 patent is not invalid for 09:13:42 8 obviousness-type double patenting over Claim…09:13:53 11 patent is not invalid for obviousness-type double patenting 09:13:57 12 …the '333 patent, the 09:14:13 16 meaning of Claim 14 of the '333 patent, the meaning | External link to document | |
| >Date Filed | >Document No. | >Description | >Snippet | >Link To Document |
