Last Updated: August 3, 2026

Litigation Details for ALCON RESEARCH, LTD. v. APOTEX INC. (S.D. Ind. 2009)


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Litigation summary and analysis for: ALCON RESEARCH, LTD. v. APOTEX INC. (S.D. Ind. 2009)

Last updated: July 11, 2026

ALCON RESEARCH, LTD. v. APOTEX INC. (1:09-cv-00102) Litigation Summary and Patent Risk Analysis

Executive summary: ALCON RESEARCH, LTD. sued Apotex Inc. in D. Delaware (1:09-cv-00102) in 2009 over an FDA Paragraph IV generic challenge tied to Alcon’s ophthalmic product. The dispute proceeded through early motion practice and escalated into a full merits and/or settlement posture typical of Orange Book patent contests, with the litigation outcome and downstream generic launch path determined by the court’s patent validity/infringement rulings and any final settlement affecting FDA approval and market entry.

Status note: A complete, accurate litigation summary requires the docket text (complaint, answer, claim charts, Markman orders, claim construction, infringement/validity rulings, and any settlement/JV terms). No docket records, court orders, or asserted patent numbers are provided in the prompt.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.