0000-00-00 |
|
|
|
External link to document |
2023-02-10 |
53 |
Opinion |
, 2018) (adding U.S. Patent No. 10,071,977); see Def. Br. at 5 (noting 15 patents
asserted in total). …5. Vanda holds multiple patents relating to
tasimelteon. The suit for patent infringement underlying …motion to transfer concerns
U.S. Patent No. 11,285,129 (the ’129 patent), which issued on March 29, 2022…related patents. 2 See Compl. ¶¶ 22-39, Vanda Pharms.
2
Vanda originally asserted six patents but added…later-issued patents to the Delaware
litigation, Vanda would not assert any additional patents against Teva |
External link to document |
2023-04-14 |
86 |
Brief - Opening Brief in Support |
the patents asserted by Vanda were U.S. Patent
Nos. RE46,604 (“the RE604 patent”) and 10,149,829 (“the…pleadings that
claims 1-3 of U.S. Patent No. 11,285,129 (“the ’129 patent”) are invalid as obvious
as a …Litigation Involving Related Patents
Before asserting the ’129 patent here, Vanda previously sued…the ’829 patent”), both of
which are related to the ’129 patent and share a common specification. Following…Court found claim 3 of the RE604 patent and claim 14 of
the ’829 patent invalid as obvious. See Vanda Pharm |
External link to document |
2023-05-12 |
94 |
Complaint - Amended |
of U.S. Patent No.
RE46,604 (“the RE604 patent”) and claim 14 of U.S. Patent No. 10,149,829 (“the ’829…’129 patent was not asserted in the prior litigation, the patentable
weight and/or patentability of the…’129 patent was not asserted in the prior litigation, the patentable
weight and/or patentability of other…Complaint for
infringement of U.S. Patent No. 11,285,129 (the ’129 patent) against Defendant Teva
Pharmaceuticals… THE PATENT-IN-SUIT
The ’129 Patent
11. |
External link to document |
2023-06-28 |
99 |
Brief - Opening Brief in Support |
the patents
asserted by Vanda were U.S. Patent Nos. RE46,604 (“the RE604 patent”) and
10,149,829 (“the…pleadings that
claims 1-3 of U.S. Patent No. 11,285,129 (“the ’129 patent”) are invalid as obvious
based…“the ’829 patent”), which are related to the ’129 patent and share a
specification. Following a four-…Court found claim 3 of the
RE604 patent and claim 14 of the ’829 patent invalid as obvious. Vanda Pharm…between
the claims of the ’129 patent and those of the RE604 and ’829 patents is a
requirement to determine |
External link to document |