Litigation Details for Synkloud Technologies, LLC v. Dropbox, Inc. (W.D. Tex. 2019)
✉ Email this page to a colleague
▶ Start for $1
Remove trial restrictions
Synkloud Technologies, LLC v. Dropbox, Inc. (W.D. Tex. 2019)
Docket | See Plans and Pricing | Date Filed | 2019-09-06 |
Court | District Court, W.D. Texas | Date Terminated | |
Cause | 35:271 Patent Infringement | Assigned To | |
Jury Demand | Plaintiff | Referred To | |
Parties | DROPBOX, INC.; SYNKLOUD TECHNOLOGIES, LLC | ||
Patents | 10,010,612; 10,023,628; 10,047,343; 10,203,343; 10,343,043; 10,363,235; 10,376,487; 10,456,650; 10,487,107; 10,525,022; 6,664,107; 7,018,664; 7,241,456; 7,456,028; 7,456,335; 7,628,216; 7,642,312; 8,021,693; 8,043,628; 8,201,556; 8,241,664; 8,304,201; 8,304,376; 8,343,487; 8,642,012; 8,642,015; 8,642,025; 8,642,314; 8,642,556; 9,026,372; 9,340,612; 9,358,235; 9,487,773; 9,622,340 | ||
Attorneys | Kevin James Terrazas | ||
Firms | Cleveland Terrazas PLLC | ||
Link to Docket | External link to docket |
Small Molecule Drugs cited in Synkloud Technologies, LLC v. Dropbox, Inc.
Biologic Drugs cited in Synkloud Technologies, LLC v. Dropbox, Inc.
The biologic drugs covered by the patents cited in this case are See Plans and Pricing , See Plans and Pricing , See Plans and Pricing , See Plans and Pricing , See Plans and Pricing , See Plans and Pricing , See Plans and Pricing , See Plans and Pricing , See Plans and Pricing , See Plans and Pricing , See Plans and Pricing , See Plans and Pricing , See Plans and Pricing , See Plans and Pricing , See Plans and Pricing , See Plans and Pricing , See Plans and Pricing , See Plans and Pricing , See Plans and Pricing , See Plans and Pricing , See Plans and Pricing , and See Plans and Pricing .
Details for Synkloud Technologies, LLC v. Dropbox, Inc. (W.D. Tex. 2019)
Date Filed | Document No. | Description | Snippet | Link To Document |
---|---|---|---|---|
2020-05-14 | 43 | Order on Motion to Transfer Case | infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,457,880 (the “’880 Patent”). ECF No. 1. The title of the ’880 Patent is “System…29 (1988) (quoting Van Dusen v. Barrack, 376 U.S. 612, 622 (1964)). The party moving for transfer carries…of modern patent litigation. In particular, based on this Court’s experience, in modern patent litigation…same patent considered by one judge. Thus, because parallel litigation concerning the same patent at issue… on a network.” According to SynKloud, the ’880 Patent “relates to providing multiple hosts access to | External link to document |
>Date Filed | >Document No. | >Description | >Snippet | >Link To Document |