Litigation Details for Route1 Inc. v. AirWatch LLC (D. Del. 2017)
✉ Email this page to a colleague
Route1 Inc. v. AirWatch LLC (D. Del. 2017)
| Docket | ⤷ Try a Trial | Date Filed | 2017-03-27 |
| Court | District Court, D. Delaware | Date Terminated | 2019-10-07 |
| Cause | 28:1338 Patent Infringement | Assigned To | Kent A. Jordan |
| Jury Demand | Plaintiff | Referred To | |
| Parties | AIRWATCH LLC; ROUTE1 INC.; VMWARE, INC. | ||
| Patents | 6,695,722; 7,981,905; 8,562,979; 8,562,981; 8,642,858; 8,858,987; 8,905,979; 8,987,554; 9,572,814; 9,814,722; 9,987,285 | ||
| Attorneys | Aaron M. Williams; Anne Shea Gaza; Bita Rahebi; Christine E. Duh; Christopher J. Wiener; Cynthia D. Vreeland; Dana O. Burwell; Dominick T. Gattuso; Elena C. Norman; Elizabeth Ann Patterson; Marcel C. Duhamel; Michael H. Smith; Michael J. Garvin; Peter M. Dichiara; Rex W. Miller; Richard S.J. Hung; Samantha G. Wilson; William F. Lee; William H. Oldach | ||
| Firms | Heyman Enerio Gattuso & Hirzel LLP; Young, Conaway, Stargatt & Taylor LLP | ||
| Link to Docket | External link to docket | ||
Small Molecule Drugs cited in Route1 Inc. v. AirWatch LLC
The small molecule drugs covered by the patents cited in this case are ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , and ⤷ Try a Trial .
Biologic Drugs cited in Route1 Inc. v. AirWatch LLC
The biologic drugs covered by the patents cited in this case are ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , and ⤷ Try a Trial .
Details for Route1 Inc. v. AirWatch LLC (D. Del. 2017)
| Date Filed | Document No. | Description | Snippet | Link To Document |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-04-23 | 334 | Opinion - Memorandum Opinion | a flat hourly rate for all attorneys of $695 in 2018 and $722 in 2019. That is a reasonable rate for … asserted infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,814,216 (the “’216 patent”). After I construed disputed …infringement claim, “the technology described in the ’216 patent is directed to a means for remote computing access…communication network. (’216 Pat. 1:7-10.) The ’216 patent claims a method by which users of ‘remote devices…the “instruction limitation,” of claim 1 of the patent. That limitation states that the controller sends | External link to document |
| >Date Filed | >Document No. | >Description | >Snippet | >Link To Document |
