Litigation Details for Philips North America LLC v. Fitbit, Inc. (D. Mass. 2019)
✉ Email this page to a colleague
▶ Start for $1
Remove trial restrictions
Philips North America LLC v. Fitbit, Inc. (D. Mass. 2019)
| Docket | See Plans and Pricing | Date Filed | 2019-07-22 |
| Court | District Court, D. Massachusetts | Date Terminated | |
| Cause | 15:1126 Patent Infringement | Assigned To | Indira Talwani |
| Jury Demand | Plaintiff | Referred To | |
| Parties | FITBIT, INC.; PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC | ||
| Patents | 10,005,783; 10,342,815; 6,830,521; 7,795,010; 7,803,376; 7,818,100; 7,935,008; 8,676,324; 8,795,673; 9,057,061 | ||
| Attorneys | Andrew T. O'Connor; Berkeley G. Fife; Chad J. Peterman; David Beckwith; David T. Okano; Eley O Thompson; Jennifer B Furey; John Custer; Lucas I. Silva; Ruben J. Rodrigues; Yar R Chaikovsky | ||
| Firms | Foley and Lardner LLP; Goulston & Storrs PC; Paul Hastings LLP | ||
| Link to Docket | External link to docket | ||
Small Molecule Drugs cited in Philips North America LLC v. Fitbit, Inc.
The small molecule drug covered by the patents cited in this case is See Plans and Pricing .
Biologic Drugs cited in Philips North America LLC v. Fitbit, Inc.
The biologic drugs covered by the patents cited in this case are See Plans and Pricing , See Plans and Pricing , See Plans and Pricing , See Plans and Pricing , See Plans and Pricing , See Plans and Pricing , See Plans and Pricing , See Plans and Pricing , See Plans and Pricing , See Plans and Pricing , See Plans and Pricing , See Plans and Pricing , and See Plans and Pricing .
Details for Philips North America LLC v. Fitbit, Inc. (D. Mass. 2019)
| Date Filed | Document No. | Description | Snippet | Link To Document |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-10 | 34 | .” Id. at 3:20–26, 5:52–67, 7:12–15, 7:28–43, 9:57–61, 10:36–39. These generic devices collect data, …off-the-shelf” data input/output ports. Id. at 6:28–32, 9:57–61, 11:30–47. Nor is there a particular or…complaint and U.S. Patent Nos. 6,013,007 (“the ’007 patent”), 6,976,958 (“the ’958 patent”), 7,088,233 (“…(“the ’233 patent”), and 8,277,377 (“the ’377 patent”) (“the Asserted Patents”) from dismissal. But Philips… the patent specification.”) B. Patent eligibility under 35 U.S.C. § 101 Patent eligibility | External link to document | |
| 2020-05-14 | 63 | 22 July 2019 1:19-cv-11586-IT 830 Patent Plaintiff District Court, D. Massachusetts…products, spread across four patents-in-suit and three separate patent families. The parties have met…International Ltd. v. Beyond Innovation Technology Co., 521 F.3d 1351 (Fed. Cir. 2008). In addition, all of …:19-cv-11586-IT Document 63 Filed 05/14/20 Page 6 of 6 CERTIFICATE…-cv-11586-IT Document 63 Filed 05/14/20 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES | External link to document | |
| 2020-05-14 | 64 | Holdings, LLC v. Sensus USA Inc., 741 F.Supp.2d 783, 815, 818 (E.D. Tex. 2010) (declining to construe…claims); In re Katz Interactive Call Processing Patent Litig., No. 07-ml- 01816-B RGK (FFMx), 2008 WL…required to construe every limitation present in a patent’s asserted claim.” O2 Micro Int’l Ltd. v. Beyon… 22 July 2019 1:19-cv-11586-IT 830 Patent Plaintiff District Court, D. Massachusetts… Case 1:19-cv-11586-IT Document 64 Filed 05/14/20 Page 5 of 6 Dated: May 14, 2020 | External link to document | |
| >Date Filed | >Document No. | >Description | >Snippet | >Link To Document |
