Litigation Details for Linksmart Wireless Technology, LLC v. Caesars Entertainment Corporation (D. Nev. 2018)
✉ Email this page to a colleague
▶ Start for $100
Remove trial restrictions
Linksmart Wireless Technology, LLC v. Caesars Entertainment Corporation (D. Nev. 2018)
Docket | ⤷ Sign Up | Date Filed | 2018-05-14 |
Court | District Court, D. Nevada | Date Terminated | |
Cause | 35:271 Patent Infringement | Assigned To | Miranda Mai Du |
Jury Demand | Both | Referred To | |
Patents | 10,034,867; 10,045,958; 10,099,996; 10,118,901; 10,239,862; 10,239,867; 10,370,346; 10,517,865; 6,572,868; 6,867,005; 7,122,372; 7,122,566; 7,125,862; 7,572,779; 7,572,966; 7,856,779; 7,867,114; 7,867,996; 8,754,045; 8,754,091; 8,754,108; 9,026,372; 9,034,372; 9,034,867; 9,119,868; 9,125,868; 9,346,862; 9,572,779; 9,572,856; 9,572,867; 9,901,113; RE46,856 | ||
Link to Docket | External link to docket |
Small Molecule Drugs cited in Linksmart Wireless Technology, LLC v. Caesars Entertainment Corporation
Biologic Drugs cited in Linksmart Wireless Technology, LLC v. Caesars Entertainment Corporation
The biologic drugs covered by the patents cited in this case are ⤷ Sign Up , ⤷ Sign Up , ⤷ Sign Up , ⤷ Sign Up , ⤷ Sign Up , ⤷ Sign Up , ⤷ Sign Up , ⤷ Sign Up , ⤷ Sign Up , ⤷ Sign Up , ⤷ Sign Up , ⤷ Sign Up , ⤷ Sign Up , ⤷ Sign Up , ⤷ Sign Up , ⤷ Sign Up , ⤷ Sign Up , ⤷ Sign Up , ⤷ Sign Up , ⤷ Sign Up , ⤷ Sign Up , ⤷ Sign Up , ⤷ Sign Up , ⤷ Sign Up , ⤷ Sign Up , ⤷ Sign Up , ⤷ Sign Up , ⤷ Sign Up , ⤷ Sign Up , ⤷ Sign Up , ⤷ Sign Up , ⤷ Sign Up , ⤷ Sign Up , ⤷ Sign Up , ⤷ Sign Up , ⤷ Sign Up , ⤷ Sign Up , ⤷ Sign Up , ⤷ Sign Up , ⤷ Sign Up , ⤷ Sign Up , ⤷ Sign Up , ⤷ Sign Up , ⤷ Sign Up , ⤷ Sign Up , ⤷ Sign Up , ⤷ Sign Up , ⤷ Sign Up , ⤷ Sign Up , ⤷ Sign Up , ⤷ Sign Up , ⤷ Sign Up , ⤷ Sign Up , ⤷ Sign Up , ⤷ Sign Up , ⤷ Sign Up , ⤷ Sign Up , ⤷ Sign Up , ⤷ Sign Up , ⤷ Sign Up , ⤷ Sign Up , and ⤷ Sign Up .
Details for Linksmart Wireless Technology, LLC v. Caesars Entertainment Corporation (D. Nev. 2018)
Date Filed | Document No. | Description | Snippet | Link To Document |
---|---|---|---|---|
2020-05-08 | 137 | Order | the ’459 Patent. (ECF No. 110 at 8 n.4.) 10 Both the ’459 Patent and the ’118 Patent were previously… unique to that user. (Id. at 5:33-34; see also 21 id. at 6:10, 6:47, 7:35 (referring to “the user…Hearing below when 10 applicable. 11 III. LEGAL STANDARD 12 Patent claim construction…terms should have the same meaning throughout a patent. 10 Moreover, as the Court accepted Defendants…Reissued Patent No. 16 RE46,459 (the “’459 Patent”) (ECF No. 1-1)1 in this consolidated patent case2 | External link to document |
>Date Filed | >Document No. | >Description | >Snippet | >Link To Document |