Litigation Details for Innovation Sciences, LLC v. Amazon.Com, Inc. (E.D. Tex. 2018)
✉ Email this page to a colleague
Innovation Sciences, LLC v. Amazon.Com, Inc. (E.D. Tex. 2018)
| Docket | ⤷ Try a Trial | Date Filed | 2018-07-05 |
| Court | District Court, E.D. Texas | Date Terminated | |
| Cause | 35:145 Patent Infringement | Assigned To | Amos Louis Mazzant III |
| Jury Demand | Both | Referred To | |
| Patents | 7,091,004; 8,003,659; 8,008,003; RE46,363 | ||
| Link to Docket | External link to docket | ||
Small Molecule Drugs cited in Innovation Sciences, LLC v. Amazon.Com, Inc.
The small molecule drugs covered by the patents cited in this case are ⤷ Try a Trial and ⤷ Try a Trial .
Biologic Drugs cited in Innovation Sciences, LLC v. Amazon.Com, Inc.
The biologic drugs covered by the patents cited in this case are ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , and ⤷ Try a Trial .
Details for Innovation Sciences, LLC v. Amazon.Com, Inc. (E.D. Tex. 2018)
| Date Filed | Document No. | Description | Snippet | Link To Document |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-15 | 161 | Memorandum & Opinion | Reissue Patent No. RE46,140 (“the ’140 Patent”)33 (“Amazon I”). VIS alleged that Amazon infringed the…983 Patent”), and U.S. Patent No. 9,729,918 (“the ’918 Patent”) (collectively “the patents-in-suit”).…the patents contained in the ’492 Patent Family22 and U.S. Patent No. 8,135,398 (“the ’398 Patent”), …infringed the ’492 Patent Family, the ’398 Patent, U.S. Patent No. 9,369,844 (“the ’844 Patent”), and U.S. … infringed the ’398 Patent, the ’844 Patent, the ’918 Patent, and the ’443 Patent. At this time, VIS | External link to document |
| 2020-05-15 | 713 | Redacted Document | REDACTION to 659 Sealed PATENT Sur-Reply to Reply to Response to PATENT Motion, for Summary Judgment…Exhibit 40, # 3 Exhibit 41, # 4 Exhibit 42, # 5 Exhibit 43, # 6 Exhibit 44, # 7 Exhibit 45, # 8 Exhibit 46… 5 July 2018 4:18-cv-00474 830 Patent Both District Court, E.D. Texas | External link to document |
| 2021-04-01 | 912 | Redacted Document | 885 (Trial Tr., IS Closing) 90:7-91:4.) In doing so, IS flouted the patent rules, which serve to “provide…asserted patents; that those patents were invalid; and that they were ineligible for patenting under Section…collectively, “the ’492 patent family”); 8,135,398 (“’398 patent”); 9,369,844 (“’844 patent”); and U.S. Reissue…Amazon for patent infringement in the Eastern District of Virginia in 2016 asserting eleven patents. 4 The…Virginia, the district court held that eight patents in the ’492 patent family claimed inel- igible subject | External link to document |
| 2021-04-30 | 939 | Response in Opposition to Motion | LLC, 743 F. App’x 978 (Fed. Cir. 2018); id. at 6:8–8:3.) Substantial evidence sup- ports the jury’s verdict…of the ’983 patent, claim 9 of the ’918 patent, and claim 1 of the ’798 patent (Mot. at 13…105, 108; ’798 patent cls. 5, 6, 52; ’918 patent cl. 28). ...…the ’983 patent. (Id. at 79:3–80:6.) “decoder” of claims 22 and 62 of the ’983 patent (Mot. at… of the ’983 patent (Mot. at 14): Elements C and D of claim 86 of the ’983 patent require “the | External link to document |
| >Date Filed | >Document No. | >Description | >Snippet | >Link To Document |
