Litigation Details for GREE, INC v. SUPERCELL OY (E.D. Tex. 2019)

GREE, INC v. SUPERCELL OY (E.D. Tex. 2019)

Docket		Date Filed	2019-02-27
Court	District Court, E.D. Texas	Date Terminated
Cause	35:271 Patent Infringement	Assigned To	James Rodney Gilstrap
Jury Demand	Both	Referred To	Roy S. Payne
Parties	DONALD E TILLER; GREE, INC; SUPERCELL OY; WILLIAM JOSEPH CORNELIUS
Patents	10,029,011; 10,029,015; 10,030,051; 10,030,059; 10,036,037; 10,036,054; 10,041,044; 10,046,000; 10,046,031; 10,046,056; 10,047,033; 10,098,910; 6,031,003; 6,574,971; 6,830,766; 7,034,007; 7,604,795; 7,910,758; 8,039,009; 8,039,030; 8,044,014; 8,044,046; 8,048,017; 8,048,043; 8,058,052; 8,388,985; 8,574,856; 8,574,858; 8,754,106; 8,901,299; 9,000,011; 9,000,021; 9,000,038; 9,000,041; 9,005,016; 9,005,056; 9,018,017; 9,020,056; 9,022,022; 9,023,001; 9,024,007; 9,024,034; 9,028,005; 9,040,034; 9,040,039; 9,040,049; 9,056,051; 9,056,052; 9,056,057; 9,056,059; 9,156,859; 9,572,856; 9,669,106; 9,980,910
Attorneys	Alton Absher , III; Andrew Thompson (Tom) Gorham; Bryan Alexander Kohm; Christopher L. Larson; Deron R Dacus; Geoffrey Robert Miller; Jeffrey Allen Ware; Jessica Andrea Martinez Kaempf; John C Alemanni; Kasey E. Koballa; Melissa Richards Smith; Michael J Sacksteder; Michael T Morlock; Norris Power Boothe; Rishi Gupta; Shannon Elizabeth Turner; Steven David Moore; Taylor Higgins Ludlam; Taylor Jacqueline Pfingst
Firms	Fenwick & West LLP - New York; Fenwick & West LLP - Seattle; FENWICK & WEST, LLP - San Francisco; Gillam & Smith LLP; Gillam and Smith LLP; Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP - Menlo Park; Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP - Raleigh; Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP NC; Kilpatrick Townsend and Stockton LLP (DC); The Dacus Firm, PC
Link to Docket	External link to docket

Biologic Drugs cited in GREE, INC v. SUPERCELL OY

Details for GREE, INC v. SUPERCELL OY (E.D. Tex. 2019)

Date Filed	Document No.	Description	Snippet	Link To Document
2020-05-11	175	Memorandum & Opinion	481 Patent”). In the ’172 Case, Plaintiff asserts U.S. Patent No. 10,286,302 (the “’302 Patent”). … field • ’481 Patent Claim 4 • ’137 Patent Claims 8, 10, 13 Having reviewed…displayed in the first field” • ’137 Patent Claims 8, 10, 13 The Parties’ Positions … Plaintiff submits: Claims 8, 10, and 13 of the ’137 Patent expressly allow the controller to …position: ’655 Patent, at [57] Abstract, col.2 ll.27–32, col.4 ll.24–27, col.9 l.64 – col.10 l.5, col	External link to document
2020-09-18	480	Transcript	client, again, is GREE, and that's G-R-E-E. 10:30:51 20 It's just like green without the N…it as to one patent or two patents or three 11:05:10 5 patents or even four patents. 11:05:12 …you, and the 10:33:30 17 patent -- the five patents, the U.S. patents GREE has in 10:33:34 18 …, is claiming is that its patents -- certain 09:43:05 16 of its patents have been infringed by the…the Plaintiff's patents, and they contend that those 09:43:19 21 patents are invalid. 09:43:	External link to document
2020-09-18	481	Transcript	why those witness pages are in there for 03:08:44 14 your use. 03:08:45 15 And, as… obtaining a patent is called patent 02:34:41 9 prosecution. To obtain a patent, one must first…called the patent claims. And 02:35:35 24 when a patent is granted by the Patent and Trademark…x27;s patents. The '655 patent, we 03:59:55 22 call that the gift and bonus patent. …number of the patent, the title of the patent, and three 04:55:16 20 figures from the patent. And	External link to document
2020-09-18	482	Transcript	(i) is information on plural kinds of player 10:29:15 2 characters and at least one kind of enemy…of the five patents. 08:39:03 25 And please remind us -- reorient us to which patent we're …:53 7 patents are about. 09:12:53 8 A. So these are the -- the battle patents where you&#…infringement of the battle patents? 09:13:20 16 A. So for the '137 battle patent, I'm going to… 09:58:32 13 two battle patents, which is the -- the '481 patent. Is -- 09:58:42	External link to document