Litigation Details for Allergan, Inc. v. Ferrum Ferro Capital, LLC (C.D. Cal. 2015)
✉ Email this page to a colleague
▶ Start for $100
Remove trial restrictions
Allergan, Inc. v. Ferrum Ferro Capital, LLC (C.D. Cal. 2015)
Docket | ⤷ Sign Up | Date Filed | 2015-06-19 |
Court | District Court, C.D. California | Date Terminated | 2015-12-27 |
Cause | 28:1441 Notice of Removal | Assigned To | John Arnold Kronstadt |
Jury Demand | Plaintiff | Referred To | Paul L. Abrams |
Parties | ALLERGAN, INC. | ||
Patents | 10,066,003; 7,030,149; 7,320,976; 7,323,463; 7,642,258; 8,133,890; 8,354,409; 8,748,425 | ||
Attorneys | Michael J Kane | ||
Firms | Fish and Richardson PC | ||
Link to Docket | External link to docket |
Small Molecule Drugs cited in Allergan, Inc. v. Ferrum Ferro Capital, LLC
Biologic Drugs cited in Allergan, Inc. v. Ferrum Ferro Capital, LLC
Details for Allergan, Inc. v. Ferrum Ferro Capital, LLC (C.D. Cal. 2015)
Date Filed | Document No. | Description | Snippet | Link To Document |
---|---|---|---|---|
2015-06-19 | 1 | Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) | Batoosingh , including U.S. Patent Nos. 7,030,149 (“the ’149 patent”), 7,320,976, 22 7,642,258, 8,133,890…interest in each of 24 these six patents, including the ’149 patent. 25 22. COMBIGAN® or…claim of each of the six patents listed above, including the 27 ’149 patent. 28 23. Because…expiration of 7 Allergan’s patents covering COMBIGAN®, including the ’149 patent. These 8 ANDAs were filed…infringed Allergan’s duly issued patents, including 13 the ’149 patent. 14 25. In response, | External link to document |
2015-08-10 | 26 | Motion to Strike | Partes Review of U.S. Patent 9 No. 7,030,149 (hereinafter the “‘149 patent”) as the America Invents…four patents, finding them obvious and therefore not patentable. 9 As to the fourth patent, the …petitioning the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s 9 (“USPTO’s”) Patent Trial & Appeal Board…FFC’s position that Claim 4 of the ‘149 Patent is non-patentable as 24 obvious, Allergan cannot demonstrate… claims of the '463 patent 16 and claim 4 of the '149 patent cannot be reconciled. 17 | External link to document |
2015-08-10 | 27 | Exhibit A - Allergan v Sandoz ED TX | drugs. (D.I. 239, Trial Tr. Day 1 (PM) at 64:10-66:3 (Batoosingh).) By contrast, a ―fixed combination… United States Patent Nos. 7,030,149 (―the ‗149 patent‖); 7,320,976 (―the ‗976 patent‖); 7,323,463 (… (―the ‗463 patent‖); and 7,642,258 (―the ‗258 patent‖) (collectively, the ―patents-in-suit‖). The Court…claim 4 of the ‗149 Patent, claim 1 of the ‗976 patent, claims 1-6 of the ‗463 Patent, and claims 1-9 of… E. The Patents-in-Suit 31. The patents-in-suit are U.S. Patent Nos. 7,030,149 ( | External link to document |
2015-08-10 | 28 | Exhibit 2 - Plaintiffs' First ROGS to KB | 4. "The '149 patent" means U.S. Patent No. 7,030,149. 19 5. "…Including the IPR petition flied against the '149 patent, to generate revenue(s), Including 10 II the… 28 December 2015 8:15-cv-00992 830 Patent Plaintiff District Court, C.D. California | External link to document |
0000-00-00 | 4 | Report on Filing of Patent/Trademark Action (Initial Notification)(AO 120) | HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK TRADEMARK NO. OR TRADEMARK 1 7,030,149 …Trademarks or ✔ Patents. G ( G the patent action involves…and Kevin Barnes PATENT OR DATE OF PATENT … G Other Pleading PATENT OR DATE OF PATENT … REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by | External link to document |
2016-01-19 | 70 | Judgment | partes review regarding Allergan’s U.S. Patent No. 7,030,149. (D.I. 1) 6 On August 10, 2015… 28 December 2015 8:15-cv-00992 830 Patent Plaintiff District Court, C.D. California | External link to document |
>Date Filed | >Document No. | >Description | >Snippet | >Link To Document |