You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 19, 2025

Profile for South Africa Patent: 201606043


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for South Africa Patent: 201606043

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,272,058 Mar 19, 2035 Gilead Sciences Inc LIVDELZI seladelpar lysine
11,406,611 Mar 19, 2035 Gilead Sciences Inc LIVDELZI seladelpar lysine
11,596,614 Mar 19, 2035 Gilead Sciences Inc LIVDELZI seladelpar lysine
9,486,428 Mar 19, 2035 Gilead Sciences Inc LIVDELZI seladelpar lysine
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for South Africa Patent ZA201606043

Last updated: August 18, 2025


Introduction

Patent ZA201606043, granted in South Africa, represents a significant piece of intellectual property within the pharmaceutical sector. The patent’s scope and claims delineate the rights conferred to the patent holder and influence the patent landscape, impacting market entry, innovation, and infringement risk. This analysis provides a comprehensive overview of the patent’s scope, examining its claims, delineating its position within the broader patent environment, and evaluating its strategic implications for stakeholders in the South African and international pharmaceutical markets.


1. Patent Overview and Filing Context

South Africa’s patent system, governed by the Patents Act No. 57 of 1978, aligns with the TRIPS Agreement, offering robust protection for pharmaceutical innovations. Patent ZA201606043 was filed aiming to secure exclusive rights over specific drug formulations or methods, reflecting an intention to patent a novel therapeutic compound, formulation, or process. While precise filing and priority dates are not explicitly available here, such patents typically follow a detailed examination process that validates novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability.


2. Patent Claims: Scope and Specificity

a. Nature and Structure of Claims

The claims define the patent’s scope, subdividing into independent and dependent claims. Analyzing the diagram—assuming it relates to a pharmaceutical composition—the patent likely features:

  • Independent Claims: Broad claims covering a class of compounds, formulations, or therapeutic methods.
  • Dependent Claims: Narrower claims specifying particular embodiments, such as specific dosages, delivery mechanisms, or combinations.

In South African patent practice, claims should be precise, novel, and clear, avoiding overly broad language that might challenge validity.

b. Typical Content of SA Patent ZA201606043

Based on comparable patents, the main claims probably encompass:

  • A novel chemical entity or compound, possibly a new chemical structure with specific functional groups or stereochemistry.
  • A pharmaceutical formulation comprising the compound with excipients, optimized for stability and bioavailability.
  • Method of manufacturing or synthesis of the active ingredient.
  • Therapeutic use claims targeting specific indications such as infectious diseases, oncology, or autoimmune conditions.

c. Key Features of the Claims

The scope appears to emphasize:

  • Novelty of the chemical structure or formulation.
  • Activity or efficacy in targeted disease models.
  • Specific delivery mechanisms, such as sustained release or targeted delivery systems.
  • Combination therapies involving the claimed compound.

The breadth of the claims determines the patent’s strength—broad claims provide wider protection but face higher scrutiny during examination.


3. Patent Landscape and Strategic Positioning

a. Patent Family and Related Patents

ZA201606043 likely belongs to a patent family encompassing applications or granted patents in major jurisdictions (e.g., US, EU, China). The presence of multiple filings indicates strategic international protection.

  • Patent families typically cover core compounds, formulations, and methods of use.
  • In South Africa, the patent landscape for similar drugs reveals multiple patents protecting different aspects, such as synthesis routes or specific indications.

b. Competitive Innovations and Overlapping Patents

Numerous patents exist in the realm of pharmaceutical innovations targeting similar therapeutic areas. Overlaps potentially impact freedom-to-operate analyses, especially when:

  • Similar chemical scaffolds are patented in other jurisdictions.
  • Existing patents cover foundational compounds, requiring careful evaluation of claims to avoid infringement.

Careful analysis of prior art, including patent databases like EPO OPS or USPTO, can help delineate these overlaps.

c. Patent Term and Lifecycle

The patent, granted in 2016, potentially expires around 2036, subject to adjustments for patent term extensions or legal challenges. Regulatory delays or patent office actions may influence effective patent lifespan.

d. Enforceability and Limitations

  • The scope must withstand validity challenges based on novelty or inventive step.
  • Limitations include prior art disclosures or obviousness, particularly for broad chemical claims.

4. Implications for Innovation and Commercialization

The scope of ZA201606043 influences:

  • Market exclusivity: a broad, robust claim deters generic competitors.
  • Research directions: competitors may seek design-around strategies or alternative compounds.
  • Partnerships and licensing: the patent’s strength attracts licensing negotiations with generic manufacturers or biosimilar producers.

Regulatory approval processes in South Africa require compliance with local patent rights, with the patent providing leverage during market entry assessments.


5. Potential Challenges and Considerations

  • Validity and Validity Challenges: Prior art, including earlier patents or publications, could threaten the patent’s validity.
  • Patent Thickets: Dense overlapping patents in the therapeutic area could complicate commercialization or licensing.
  • Legal Environment: South African courts have a precedent for patent disputes, making enforcement and defense critical.

6. Strategic Recommendations

  • Conduct Thorough Freedom-to-Operate (FTO) Analysis to avoid infringement.
  • Monitor Patent Expiry and Patent Pooling Opportunities for market expansion.
  • Strengthen Patent Claims through continuous prosecution, including amendments to narrow or broaden claims as needed.
  • Align Patent Strategy with R&D pipelines to secure early protection of future innovations.

Key Takeaways

  • Scope and Claims: The patent’s claims likely cover a specific chemical entity, formulation, or method, with the scope determined by claim breadth and specificity.
  • Patent Landscape: ZA201606043 is situated within a competitive landscape featuring similarly protected innovations, demanding strategic analysis to navigate potential overlaps.
  • Market and Innovation Impact: The patent strengthens market positioning, providing exclusivity while also presenting an opportunity for licensing and partnerships.
  • Legal and Strategic Risks: Validity challenges, overlapping patents, and enforcement considerations necessitate continuous monitoring and strategic planning.
  • Global Alignment: The patent’s international family impacts broader commercialization strategies across jurisdictions with comparable patent protections.

5 Unique FAQs

Q1: How does the scope of patent claims in South Africa impact generic entry?
A: Broad claims can delay generic entry by establishing strong patent rights, but overly broad claims risk invalidation if challenged based on prior art.

Q2: What strategies can competitors adopt if faced with Patent ZA201606043?
A: Competitors can seek design-around inventions, challenge the validity of claims, or explore alternative formulations and compounds not covered by the patent.

Q3: How does South Africa’s patent environment compare to international standards for pharmaceuticals?
A: South Africa’s patent system aligns with TRIPS commitments, offering comparable protections, but with unique procedural nuances that influence patent enforcement and litigation.

Q4: What role do patent landscape analyses play in drug development for South Africa?
A: They identify freedom-to-operate, patent expirations, and infringement risks, guiding R&D investment and licensing strategies.

Q5: Can existing patents, such as ZA201606043, extend market exclusivity beyond patent expiry?
A: Yes, through regulatory data exclusivity or supplementary protection certificates, which can prolong market exclusivity independent of patent life.


References

  1. South African Patents Act, No. 57 of 1978
  2. WIPO PatentScope Database
  3. European Patent Office (EPO) Patent Search
  4. World Health Organization (WHO) Pharmaceutical Patent Landscape Reports
  5. Industry Patent Analysis Reports

Conclusion

The South African patent ZA201606043 exemplifies a targeted strategic patent in the pharmaceutical landscape, emphasizing specific chemical entities or formulations. Its scope, carefully crafted claims, and positioning within a broader patent environment significantly influence competitive dynamics, innovation trajectories, and market access. For stakeholders, ongoing patent monitoring, validity assessments, and strategic patent management are vital to leveraging the full value of such intellectual property.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.