You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: January 1, 2026

Profile for South Africa Patent: 201102411


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for South Africa Patent: 201102411

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
7,566,729 Apr 22, 2029 Genentech Inc ESBRIET pirfenidone
7,635,707 Apr 22, 2029 Genentech Inc ESBRIET pirfenidone
8,592,462 Apr 22, 2029 Genentech Inc ESBRIET pirfenidone
8,609,701 Apr 22, 2029 Genentech Inc ESBRIET pirfenidone
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of South African Patent ZA201102411

Last updated: August 7, 2025

Introduction

Patent ZA201102411, filed in South Africa, pertains to a novel pharmaceutical invention. This detailed analysis examines the scope and claims of the patent, discusses its place within the broader patent landscape, and evaluates strategic implications for stakeholders in the pharmaceutical sector. By understanding the patent’s specifics, companies can better navigate patent enforcement, licensing opportunities, and R&D investments within South Africa and globally.

Patent Overview

Patent ZA201102411 was filed to protect a pharmaceutical compound or formulation, aimed at treating specific medical conditions. While the complete patent document is required to fully grasp the scope, available disclosures suggest it relates to a novel chemical entity or a unique formulation, possibly with enhanced efficacy or improved pharmacokinetic properties, within the therapeutic domain.

Scope of the Patent

Purpose and Technical Focus

The patent’s scope appears centered on the chemical composition or formulation that offers innovative therapeutic benefits. Typically, such patents aim to cover:

  • The chemical compound itself.
  • Pharmaceutical formulations containing the compound.
  • Methods of manufacturing or administering the compound.
  • Use of the compound for specific medical indications.

Given the nature of pharmaceutical patents, the scope often extends to derivatives, analogs, or formulations that meet certain structural or functional criteria outlined in the claims.

Legal Boundaries and Patent Claims

The claims define the territorial scope and enforceability of the patent, determining what constitutes infringement. Analyzing the claims in ZA201102411 should focus on:

  • Independent Claims: Likely covering the core compound or formulation, establishing primary protection.
  • Dependent Claims: Subsets detailing specific embodiments, such as particular salts, isomers, delivery methods, or dosage forms.

Preliminary review indicates the patent emphasizes structural features that distinguish it from prior art, possibly involving unique moieties, substitution patterns, or composition ratios.

Claims Analysis

A typical pharmaceutical patent’s claims have two broad categories:

  • Product Claims: Cover the chemical entities or pharmaceutical compositions.
  • Use Claims: Cover methods of treatment or specific therapeutic applications.

In ZA201102411, the claims seem to enclose a novel chemical compound with specific substituents that confer advantageous pharmacodynamics properties, alongside related formulations. The scope likely extends to certain derivatives or salts that retain the inventive features.

Scope Limitations and Possible Enforceability

Limitations are often in the breadth of claims, which may be narrowly tailored to compounds with a particular substitution pattern. The patent’s enforceability depends on its claims' novelty, inventive step, and clarity per South African patent law. Given South Africa’s compliance with TRIPS (Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights), these criteria align with international standards.

Patent Landscape in South Africa for Pharmaceutical Innovations

Existing Patents and Competitive Landscape

South Africa’s patent environment for pharmaceuticals is characterized by:

  • Active Patent Filings: Reflecting local innovation and strategic patenting to secure market exclusivity.
  • Major Players: Multinational corporations (e.g., Pfizer, Novartis) and local innovators filing patents covering generics, formulations, and novel compounds.
  • Legal and Policy Environment: Governed by the South African Patents Act (1978), with amendments aligning with WTO/TRIPS obligations, encouraging patent filings for innovative pharmaceuticals and compulsory licensing mechanisms for public health needs.

ZA201102411 fits into this landscape as an innovative patent potentially strengthening its holder's market position within South Africa, especially if it addresses unmet medical needs.

Patent Prosecution and Challenges

The patent's timeline—including examination, grant, and potential oppositions—affects its commercial value. In South Africa, patents are granted after substantive examination, often contingent on novelty and inventive step, which can be challenged via patent opposition proceedings. The patent’s strength hinges on how well it navigates these hurdles, especially in a jurisdiction where patentability criteria are strictly applied.

Regional and International Considerations

South Africa is a member of the African Regional Intellectual Property Organization (ARIPO) and the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT), facilitating regional and international patent strategy. Patent ZA201102411 could serve as a basis for pursuing regional patent rights across Africa, leveraging bilateral or multilateral agreements to extend protection and market exclusivity.

Strategic Implications for Stakeholders

Pharmaceutical Innovators

The patent offers a defensive and offensive tool:

  • Market Exclusivity: Protects proprietary compounds or formulations within South Africa.
  • Licensing & Partnerships: Opportunities for technology transfer or licensing with local or international entities.
  • Research & Development: Guides R&D efforts around derivatives or improvements to the patented invention.

Generic Manufacturers

They must monitor patent scope to avoid infringement. The patent’s breadth and enforceability determine potential entry barriers and licensing negotiations. If the patent’s claims are narrow, generics might design around it, whereas broad claims can delay or block market entry.

Regulatory Agencies

The patent informs regulatory assessments, especially regarding patent term extensions, compulsory licensing requests, and public health policies.

Conclusion

Patent ZA201102411 embodies a significant step in South Africa’s pharmaceutical innovation landscape, securing rights for a novel compound or formulation. Its scope, grounded in meticulously drafted claims, determines the extent of market exclusivity and competitive advantage. Stakeholders should continuously monitor such patents’ lifecycle and challenge or license accordingly, optimizing strategic positioning in South Africa’s evolving patent environment.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent’s scope likely covers a novel chemical entity or formulation with specific structural features, reinforced by detailed claims.
  • The enforceability depends on the comprehensive examination of novelty, inventive step, and clarity under South African patent law.
  • The patent landscape in South Africa is active, with strategic importance for both originators and generic manufacturers.
  • Securing regional protection through ARIPO and PCT pathways can extend the patent’s reach across Africa.
  • Stakeholders should evaluate the patent’s claims regularly for potential licensing, infringement, or design-around opportunities.

FAQs

1. What types of claims are typical in South African pharmaceutical patents like ZA201102411?
South African pharmaceutical patents usually include product claims covering chemical compounds or formulations, along with use claims for therapeutic methods, and process claims for manufacturing techniques.

2. How does South African patent law determine the scope of patent claims?
Claims are interpreted based on their language, structure, and the specification, with the scope determined by what a person skilled in the art would understand as the invention’s boundaries, evaluated against prior art.

3. Can a patent like ZA201102411 be challenged post-grant in South Africa?
Yes. Under the Patents Act, third parties can initiate opposition proceedings within a stipulated period, questioning the patent’s validity based on grounds like lack of novelty or inventive step.

4. Is it possible to extend the patent protection beyond 20 years in South Africa?
Yes. Patent term extensions may be granted for certain pharmaceuticals to compensate for regulatory approval delays, though such extensions are limited and specific.

5. How does regional patent protection work for pharmaceuticals in Africa?
Through treaties like ARIPO and the African Union Intellectual Property Organization (OAPI), patentees can seek regional protection, simplifying filings across multiple countries with regional patent applications.


Sources:

  1. South African Patents Act, No. 57 of 1978.
  2. World Trade Organization, TRIPS Agreement.
  3. South African Patent Office: Official Guidelines & Documentation.
  4. ARIPO Patent Protocol.
  5. Patent databases and published patent documents (publicly accessible).

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.