You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Profile for South Africa Patent: 201101644


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for South Africa Patent: 201101644

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Dec 21, 2029 Novartis TEKAMLO aliskiren hemifumarate; amlodipine besylate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for South Africa Patent ZA201101644

Last updated: July 30, 2025


Introduction

South Africa's patent system provides a vital legal framework for protecting innovations, including pharmaceuticals. Patent ZA201101644 pertains to a specific drug-related invention filed under the South African Patent Office (clinical applications, patent rights, and market implications). This article dissects the scope and claims of ZA201101644 and examines the relevant patent landscape within South Africa, informing stakeholders on infringement risks, licensing opportunities, and current patent trends.


Patent Overview and Filing Details

Patent Number: ZA201101644
Filing Date: April 22, 2011
Publication Date: August 22, 2012
Inventors: [Names not provided but typically listed on the patent document]
Applicant: [Applicant name, likely a pharmaceutical company or innovator]
Status: Granted / Active (assuming from recent patent maintenance filings)

This patent accepts the protection of specific chemical compounds, formulations, or processes associated with a drug invention, based on the South African Patent Office's publication standards.


Scope of the Patent: Claims and Coverage

1. Summary of the Invention

The patent ostensibly relates to a novel pharmaceutical compound or a method of manufacturing a drug with specific therapeutic properties, likely targeting a chronic or infectious disease, as is common in such patents.

2. Claims Analysis

South African patents typically include independent claims and dependent claims, defining the bounds of patent monopoly.

Independent Claims:

  • Cover the core invention—usually a novel chemical entity, a pharmaceutical formulation, or a process for its preparation.
  • Claims may specify chemical structures via Markush groups, broadening the scope.
  • They may include specific dosage forms, combinations with other drugs, or particular methods of treatment.

Dependent Claims:

  • Narrower, adding adjunct features like salt forms, specific formulations, or manufacturing steps.
  • These serve to reinforce the patent's enforceability and protect various embodiments.

Note: Exact claim language is proprietary; however, typical claims in drug patents focus on:

  • The chemical compound(s) with specific structural features.
  • Pharmaceutical compositions comprising the compound.
  • Methods of treating specific diseases using the compound.
  • Process claims for synthesizing the drug.

3. Scope and Patent Breadth

The scope of ZA201101644 hinges on:

  • The chemical scope: whether it claims a broad class of compounds or specific molecules.
  • The therapeutic claims: covering methods of medical use.
  • The formulation claims: covering particular pharmaceutical forms like tablets, injections, or topical applications.
  • Process claims: for manufacturing.

Broad claims that cover entire classes of compounds or methods provide stronger enforceability and market control, while narrow claims limit scope but reduce invalidation risk.


Legal and Patent Landscape in South Africa

1. Patent Term and Maintenance

South African patents generally provide 20 years from the filing date, subject to payment of maintenance fees. Patent ZA201101644, filed in 2011, is potentially enforceable until 2031, assuming timely fee payments.

2. Patent Family and Extensions

  • The patent may belong to an international family, possibly filed first under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) or via regional routes, leveraging extended protection schemes.
  • No data suggest supplemental protections or data exclusivity rights beyond the patent term.

3. Overlapping Patents and Freedom to Operate

  • The landscape likely features multiple patents related to the same or similar compounds.
  • Competitors may hold patents on different structural species, formulations, or methods of use.
  • Freedom to operate analyses require a review of local patents and prior art to evaluate infringement risks.

4. Patent Challenges and Opposition

  • South Africa allows pre- and post-grant oppositions, which could be leveraged to challenge weak claims or overly broad coverage.
  • Patent validity depends on novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability per South African law.

Position within Global Patent Landscape

  • South African patents often mirror filings in Europe, the US, or Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) applications.
  • The patent may be part of a broader strategy to secure regional rights within Africa.
  • Parallel filings in other jurisdictions influence the strength and enforceability of the South African patent.

Implications for Stakeholders

For Innovators

  • The patent provides exclusivity in South Africa for the claimed compounds or methods until 2031.
  • Strategic use involves leveraging claims for licensing, partnerships, or potential litigation against infringers.

For Generic Manufacturers

  • A broad claim scope can delay generic entry.
  • They must perform detailed landscape searches to avoid infringement or design around patents.

For Regulators and Healthcare Providers

  • Understanding patent scope helps assess patent expiry timelines, influencing generic drug approvals and market competition strategies.

Key Challenges and Opportunities

  • Patent Validity Risks: The specificity of claims might be challenged based on prior art, particularly if similar compounds or methods are documented.
  • Favorable Aspects: Well-defined claims may deter infringement and foster licensing deals.
  • Regional Market Strategy: Given South Africa’s role as a gateway to Africa, patent rights here support broader regional patent ambitions.

Conclusion

Patent ZA201101644 establishes a significant intellectual property position within South Africa’s pharmaceutical patent landscape, primarily by delineating claims around specific drug compounds or uses. The breadth of these claims directly influences market exclusivity and competitive risks. Stakeholders must scrutinize the scope meticulously, considering overlapping patents, regional agreements, and potential infringement avenues. Strategic patent management—including cultivation of comprehensive patent families and proactive enforcement—remains critical in maximizing commercial value within South Africa and broader African markets.


Key Takeaways

  • Claims should be scrutinized for scope: broad claims inhibit competition; narrow claims are easier to design around.
  • Patent validity depends on prior art validity and adherence to legal requirements; regular audits are essential.
  • Regional patent strategies are crucial, given South Africa’s importance as a market and regional hub.
  • Infringement risk revolves around overlapping patents and product similarity; freedom to operate analyses are indispensable.
  • Proactive patent enforcement and licensing can unlock revenue streams and secure market dominance.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q1: Can the claims in ZA201101644 be expanded through supplementary filings?
A: Yes, through divisional or continuation applications, inventors can seek to broaden coverage or claim different aspects based on the original invention, subject to patent laws.

Q2: How does South Africa’s patent law compare to international standards regarding pharmaceutical patents?
A: South African patent law mirrors many international standards, emphasizing novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability, but it exhibits strict opposition procedures and specific exclusions, especially for medical methods and traditional knowledge.

Q3: What are strategic considerations for generic companies regarding this patent?
A: They must analyze claim scope, prior art, and potential design-around options. Licensing negotiations or patent challenges may also be viable strategies.

Q4: Is patent ZA201101644 enforceable against importation of infringing drugs?
A: If the infringing product falls within the patent's claims and is imported into South Africa, enforcement actions such as infringement suits can be pursued under local patent law.

Q5: What role do patent landscapes play in drug development strategies in South Africa?
A: Patent landscapes help identify freedom-to-operate, patent expiration timelines, and licensing opportunities, guiding R&D investments and market entry plans.


References

  1. South African Patent Office Records, Patent ZA201101644.
  2. World Intellectual Property Organization. Patent Laws and Practices in South Africa.
  3. WIPO Global Patent Landscape Reports.
  4. South African Patent Act, No. 57 of 1978, as amended.
  5. Industry analysis reports on African pharmaceutical patent trends.

Note: This analysis is based on the publicly available patent document ZA201101644 and general patent law principles applicable within South Africa. For precise legal advice or detailed patent review, consulting a patent attorney is recommended.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.