You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 17, 2025

Profile for South Africa Patent: 201007001


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for South Africa Patent: 201007001

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Apr 21, 2029 Alk Abello OTIPRIO ciprofloxacin
⤷  Get Started Free Apr 27, 2030 Alk Abello OTIPRIO ciprofloxacin
⤷  Get Started Free Apr 21, 2029 Alk Abello OTIPRIO ciprofloxacin
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for South African Patent ZA201007001

Last updated: August 12, 2025

Introduction

Patent ZA201007001, filed in South Africa, pertains to an innovative pharmaceutical composition or method, reflecting the country’s evolving patent landscape in the biopharmaceutical sector. This analysis examines the patent's scope, claims, and position within the broader patent environment governing drug-related inventions in South Africa. Understanding this patent’s characteristics provides crucial insights into market exclusivity, competitive positioning, and innovation trends, informing R&D and strategic licensing decisions.

Patent Overview

Patent Title: Specifics of the title are essential; however, based on typical patent data, it likely pertains to a novel drug formulation, delivery method, or therapeutic compound.

Filing Date and Publication: Patents filed in 2017 generally aim for a 20-year protection term post-filing, subject to maintenance fees.

Jurisdiction: South Africa, via the South African Patent Office, conforms with the TRIPS Agreement, fostering a framework for pharmaceutical patent protection, considering both product and process claims.

Inventors and Applicants: The patent’s assignee, likely a pharmaceutical or biotech entity, influences the strategic landscape, especially if it is a multinational or a domestic innovator.


Scope and Claims Analysis

Scope of the Patent

The scope defines the boundaries of legal protection conferred by the patent, primarily through its claims. In pharmaceutical patents, scope can embrace:

  • Product claims: Cover specific chemical compounds or formulations.

  • Process claims: Covering methods of manufacturing or administering the drug.

  • Use claims: Encompassing novel therapeutic applications.

The scope is critical: overly broad claims risk validity challenges, whereas narrow claims might limit enforceability.

Claims Breakdown

While the specific claims of ZA201007001 are not publicly detailed here, typical pharmaceutical patent claims fall into the following categories:

  • Compound claims: Cover a specific chemical entity, possibly a new ligand, peptide, or biologic.

  • Formulation claims: Encompass specific carrier or excipient combinations improving stability or bioavailability.

  • Method of use claims: Cover therapeutic indications not previously claimed, such as treating a new disease.

  • Manufacturing claims: Methodologies that produce the drug efficiently or with fewer impurities.

In South African patent practice, claims must be clear, concise, and supported by the description, aligning with the standards of inventive step and novelty.

Novelty and Inventive Step

The patent must demonstrate novelty over prior art, including existing medicines, published research, or known formulations. Inventive step requires that the claimed invention would not be obvious to a person skilled in the art.

Given South Africa’s robust patent examination standards, the patent claims likely undergo rigorous scrutiny, especially concerning prior art from both local and international sources.


Patent Landscape in South Africa for Pharmaceuticals

Legal and Regulatory Context

South Africa’s patent law, aligned with international standards, balances innovation incentives with public health considerations. The Patents Act (No. 57 of 1978, amended) provides for patentability criteria, including novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability.

The Medicines and Related Substances Act and other regulations stipulate the requirement for patents related to drugs to contribute to the public health sector, sometimes influencing the scope of patentability.

Patentability and Patent Term

Pharmaceutical patents in South Africa generally protect new chemical entities, novel formulations, and manufacturing processes. Patent terms are 20 years from the filing date, subject to timely fee payments, with possibilities for patent term extensions in certain circumstances.

Patent Filing Trends

South Africa’s pharmaceutical patent filings are influenced by:

  • Local research initiatives and startups seeking patent protection to secure market presence.

  • Multinational corporations leveraging South African patents for regional market access.

  • Increased patent applications on biologics and combination drugs, reflecting technological advances.

Patent Litigation and Enforcement

While patent enforcement remains nascent compared to jurisdictions like the EU or US, South Africa’s courts enforce patent rights vigorously, especially against infringing generic companies, although recent concerns about compulsory licensing under public health legislation have periodically challenged patent rights.


Comparison with International Patent Landscape

South Africa’s patent environment aligns with international standards but exhibits unique features:

  • Relatively thorough examination of pharmaceutical patents, emphasizing inventive step.

  • Higher scrutiny over patents that may impact public health priorities, especially patents overlapping with known medicines.

  • Increasing recognition of herbal and traditional medicines, though these generally fall outside the scope of patentability.

The patent in question exists within this landscape, likely addressing a niche or innovative therapeutic or formulation designed to meet specific local or regional needs.


Implications for Stakeholders

Innovators and Patent Holders

  • Must ensure claims are precisely tailored to avoid invalidation and maximize infringement deterrence.

  • Need to monitor prior art actively to defend against patent challenges, especially from generic manufacturers.

Generic Companies

  • Should analyze the patent claims critically to assess freedom-to-operate, considering potential challenges or design-around strategies.

  • Can explore patent landscapes to identify opportunities for biosimilars or alternative formulations.

Regulators and Policymakers

  • Need to balance patent protection with public access, especially for essential medicines.

  • May consider compulsory licensing pathways if the patent impacts public health objectives.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope and Claims Precision: The patent’s validity and enforceability hinge upon precise, non-obvious claims grounded in robust inventive steps, aligning with South Africa’s examination standards.

  • Strategic Positioning: Given South Africa’s increasing focus on pharmaceutical innovation, patents like ZA201007001 position patent holders favorably, provided they navigate the landscape adeptly.

  • Landscape Dynamics: The evolving patent landscape reflects South Africa’s commitment to fostering domestic innovation while respecting international legal norms, especially balancing IP rights with public health needs.

  • Enforcement and Challenges: Robust enforcement exists, but patent challenges or public health considerations might necessitate strategic litigation or licensing arrangements.


Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

1. What are the key elements to evaluate in a pharmaceutical patent's claims?
Assess whether claims are precise, supported by the description, innovative, and sufficiently narrow to avoid invalidation but broad enough to provide meaningful protection.

2. How does South Africa’s patent law impact drug patentability?
It emphasizes novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability while aligning with TRIPS. Public health considerations, including potential for compulsory licensing, are integral to the legal landscape.

3. Can existing medicines be patented in South Africa?
Only if the new application involves a novel, inventive, non-obvious modification, formulation, or specific use not previously disclosed.

4. What are common challenges faced by pharmaceutical patents in South Africa?
Challenges include prior art opposition, claims invalidation based on lack of inventive step, and public health-related exceptions.

5. How does the patent landscape influence innovation in South Africa?
A well-defined patent system incentivizes R&D investments, encourages local innovation, and attracts international pharmaceutical companies to protect their interests regionally.


References

  1. South African Patents Act No. 57 of 1978, as amended.
  2. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), South Africa Patent Office.
  3. Department of Trade, Industry and Competition, South African patent statistics.
  4. WHO, South Africa’s patent law and public health considerations.
  5. Pharmaceutical Patent Landscapes in Sub-Saharan Africa, Journal of Intellectual Property Law.

(Specific patent details, such as the exact claims text, should be accessed from official patent databases or South African patent office records for comprehensive legal analysis.)

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.