You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 19, 2025

Profile for South Africa Patent: 201006679


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for South Africa Patent: 201006679

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Mar 10, 2029 Takeda Pharms Usa DEXILANT SOLUTAB dexlansoprazole
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Comprehensive Analysis of Patent ZA201006679 for South African Drug Patent Landscape

Last updated: July 31, 2025

Introduction

Patent ZA201006679, granted in South Africa, represents a significant intellectual property asset in the pharmaceutical sector. Its scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape inform strategic business, R&D, and legal decisions. This analysis dissects the patent’s scope, claims, and positioning within South Africa's evolving pharmaceutical patent environment.


Patent Overview and Background

Given the patent number ZA201006679 was granted in 2010, it likely pertains to a pharmaceutical compound, formulation, or method to address a specific therapeutic need. South Africa’s patent system, aligned closely with the World Trade Organization’s TRIPS Agreement, recognizes pharmaceutical patents under its patent law, provided they meet novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability criteria.

The patent’s core focus appears to involve a novel chemical entity or a specific formulation designed to treat a disease—common in such patents. Without the exact patent document text here, general principles guide the analysis.


Scope of the Patent

1. Patent Type and Coverage

Patent ZA201006679’s scope primarily encompasses inventive pharmaceutical compositions or methods. Its claims are expressly designed to delineate the boundaries of exclusivity, addressing the compound’s chemical structure, its variants, or the method of treatment.

Key elements of scope likely include:

  • Chemical Entities: The core invention often involves a novel chemical compound or derivatives thereof, aimed at a particular therapeutic purpose.
  • Pharmaceutical Use: The patent encompasses methods of using the compound to treat specific diseases or conditions.
  • Formulations: Claims may extend to specific pharmaceutical formulations, including dosage forms, carriers, and delivery mechanisms.
  • Manufacturing Processes: Claims could include manufacturing steps or processes for preparing the drug.

2. Claim Types and Hierarchy

In South African patent practice, claims generally fall into:

  • Product Claims: Cover the chemical compound or its derivatives.
  • Use Claims: Cover the application of the compound for treating specific conditions.
  • Process Claims: Cover manufacturing or formulation methods.

The broadest scope often resides in product claims, with narrower dependent claims providing specific embodiments.

3. Claim Scope and Limitations

  • Novelty and Inventive Step Requirements: Claims are limited by prior art, including existing patents and scientific disclosures.
  • Specificity of Claims: Overly broad claims are susceptible to objections based on lack of inventive step; specificity enhances enforceability.
  • Scope of Claims: Depending on the drafting, the claims may be narrow (e.g., specific chemical structures) or broad (e.g., any compound within a chemical class).

Patent Landscape in South Africa

1. Patent Protection for Pharmaceuticals

South Africa’s patent law, governed primarily by the Patents Act 57 of 1978 (as amended), recognizes pharmaceutical patents, but specific provisions, such as the patentability of polymorphs, formulations, and methods of treatment, influence the scope of patent portfolios.

2. Patent Term and Data Exclusivity

  • Patent Duration: Generally 20 years from the filing date, subject to maintenance fees.
  • Data Exclusivity: In South Africa, regulatory data protection is limited, but patent exclusivity governs market rights.

3. Patent Landcape and Key Players

South Africa’s pharmaceutical patent landscape features local innovators and multinationals. Patent filings tend to cluster around blockbuster drugs, emerging therapeutics, and formulations facilitating access to treatment.

4. Patent Challenges and Litigation

  • Challenges: Patents are susceptible to opposition or revocation if challenged based on prior art or lack of inventive step.

  • Compulsory Licensing: South Africa's laws permit compulsory licenses under public health emergencies, impacting patent holders' rights.

  • Patent Evergreening: Strategies such as minor modifications to extend patent life are scrutinized under South African law, aligning with international standards.

5. Patent Strategies

Companies often seek robust patent protection around core compounds, formulations, and treatment methods. They may also pursue supplementary protection certificates (SPCs) or data exclusivity to extend market rights.


Specific Analysis of Patent ZA201006679

1. Likely Patent Objectives

Given the patent's designation, it appears oriented toward:

  • Novel chemical compounds or derivatives with improved efficacy or safety.
  • Specific formulations to enhance bioavailability or stability.
  • Method of use or treatment protocols targeting a particular disease.

2. Key Claims Examination

  • Product claims: Cover the chemical entity or derivatives with unique structural features.
  • Use claims: Encompass methods of treating specific ailments, binding the chemical compound to therapeutic benefits.
  • Formulation claims: Protect specific dosage forms, such as sustained-release tablets or injectables.

3. Patent Validity and Enforceability

The strength of the claims depends on their novelty against prior art and inventive step. Prior disclosures, existing patents, and scientific literature in South Africa or international sources could challenge the patent's scope.

4. Patent Challenges and Risks

  • Potential for prior art objections: Especially if similar chemical structures or therapies are documented.
  • Evergreening tactics: Using minor structural changes to extend patent life may face legal scrutiny.
  • Compulsory licenses: Public health priorities could authorize licensees to produce generic versions, especially in developing scenarios.

Positioning within the Global Patent Landscape

This patent may intersect with global patent families if similar compounds or methods are patented abroad, notably in jurisdictions with robust pharmaceutical patent systems like the US, EU, and China. International patent filings (via PCT or direct national filings) influence South African patent litigation and licensing strategies.

Comparison with International Patent Strategies

  • Strength of Claims: Broader claims increase market coverage but risk invalidation.
  • Patent Family Strategy: Maintaining family members across key jurisdictions fortifies market position.

Regulatory and Commercial Implications

Successful enforcement of patent ZA201006679 provides a competitive advantage, enabling exclusive marketing rights in South Africa, market pricing power, and potential licensing revenue. Conversely, patent challenges or legal disputes can impact product launch timelines.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope of Patent: Encompasses novel chemical compounds, formulations, and methods for treating specific conditions, with claim language likely designed to balance breadth and defensibility.
  • Patent Landscape: South Africa’s evolving IP regime emphasizes patent robustness, with increased scrutiny of evergreening practices and public health considerations.
  • Strategic Positioning: Patent holders should monitor local legal developments, potential challenges, and international patent portfolios to maximize commercial benefits.
  • Legal Considerations: Enforcement and licensing strategies should account for the possibility of compulsory licensing and other public health safeguards.
  • Future Outlook: Continued innovation, precise claim drafting, and strategic patent filing will be essential in maintaining market exclusivity amid generic competition and legal challenges.

FAQs

Q1: What distinguishes a South African patent like ZA201006679 from international patents?
A1: While the legal principles are similar, South African patents are governed by national law emphasizing strict novelty and inventive step. Regional and international patents may differ in scope, duration, and enforceability due to jurisdictional variations.

Q2: Can existing medicines be patented in South Africa?
A2: Yes, if they meet patentability criteria—namely novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability. However, method-of-use patents are more scrutinized, especially when related to known compounds.

Q3: How does South Africa address patent evergreening?
A3: South African law scrutinizes minor modifications intended solely to extend patent life. Compulsory licensing can also be used if a patent is abused to restrict access.

Q4: What is the importance of patent claims in pharmaceutical patents?
A4: Claims delineate the legal scope of protection. Well-crafted claims can prevent infringing products and underpin licensing strategies.

Q5: How does patent litigation impact pharmaceutical companies in South Africa?
A5: Litigation can delay product launches, increase costs, and influence licensing negotiations. Strategic patent portfolio management mitigates these risks.


References

  1. South African Patents Act 57 of 1978.
  2. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). South African Patent System Overview.
  3. South African Patent Office official documents and patent database.
  4. International Patent Classification (IPC) and patent prosecution literature.

Note: Due to limited access to the specific patent document ZA201006679, this analysis is based on standard practices, legal frameworks, and typical patent structures in South Africa’s pharmaceutical sector. For precise claim language and detailed legal status, direct review of the patent document is recommended.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.