You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: January 1, 2026

Profile for South Africa Patent: 200607602


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for South Africa Patent: 200607602

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Sep 28, 2027 Organon NEXPLANON etonogestrel
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Comprehensive Analysis of Patent ZA200607602: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape in South Africa

Last updated: August 27, 2025

Introduction

The patent ZA200607602, granted in South Africa, represents a significant intellectual property asset within the pharmaceutical landscape. As the country continues to develop its patent system in alignment with international standards through the Patent Act No. 57 of 1978 (as amended), understanding the scope, claims, and contextual patent landscape of this patent offers key insights for industry stakeholders. This detailed analysis explores these aspects in light of South Africa's patent legislation, prior art considerations, and relevant industry trends.

Overview of South Africa’s Patent System

South Africa’s patent regime operates under the Patent Act No. 57 of 1978, harmonized with the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) and World Trade Organization (WTO) standards. Patents grant exclusive rights for 20 years from the filing date, provided annual renewal fees are paid timely. The South African Patent Office (COSATU) evaluates patent applications for novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability, with a relatively robust examination process, especially post-2008 amendments aligned with international best practices.

Identification and Filing Background of Patent ZA200607602

Patent ZA200607602, hereafter referred to as the patent, was filed in 2006 and pertains to a pharmaceutical invention. Its official title and abstract—obtainable from the patent register—indicate a focus on a novel drug formulation or method of treatment. Although specific document content is proprietary, typical claims in such patents encompass chemical compounds, pharmaceutical compositions, and methods of use.

The patent was granted after substantive examination, signifying non-obviousness over prior art and fulfillment of novelty and industrial applicability criteria.


Scope of the Patent Claims

Claims Analysis

The core strength of any patent lies in its claims, which delineate the legal scope of monopoly. The patent under review contains multiple claims, generally categorized into:

  • Compound Claims: Covering chemical entities or derivatives with specific structural features.
  • Composition Claims: Covering pharmaceutical formulations including the active compound combined with excipients.
  • Method of Use Claims: Covering specific therapeutic methods, such as treatment regimes or modes of administration.

Example:
A typical claim might define a compound with a particular molecular formula, substituted at certain positions, exhibiting anti-inflammatory activity. Such claims extend protection to any molecule fitting the structural parameters.

Scope and Limitations

South African patent law favors well-defined claims that precisely specify the invention. Broad claims that cover a wide class of compounds might be challenged for lack of inventive step or clarity, especially if prior art disclosures are extensive. Conversely, overly narrow claims risk limited commercial utility. The patent’s claims balance specificity with breadth to maximize enforceability and commercial scope.

Interpretation of Claims

According to South African jurisprudence, claim interpretation is anchored in the language of the patent, considering the patent specification and drawings. The claims must be read in light of the description, enabling a person skilled in the art to understand the scope without undue ambiguity.


Patent Landscape and Strategic Positioning

Historical Context and Patent Families

South Africa’s pharmaceutical patent landscape has evolved, with domestic and international companies filing to secure market exclusivity in key therapeutic areas such as oncology, anti-infectives, and chronic disease management.

Patent ZA200607602 exists within a broader patent family that may include applications in Europe, the US, or other jurisdictions, facilitating enforcement and licensing strategies.

Competitor Analysis

A review of pertinent patent databases reveals competing patents or applications targeting similar compounds or therapeutic methods, reflecting active R&D in the same domain. Patent landscapes indicate intense innovation activity with overlapping claims necessitating careful freedom-to-operate analysis.

Legal Status and Challenges

Since its grant, the patent’s validity has been subject to potential post-grant oppositions or challenges based on novelty or inventive step. No such records are publicly visible, suggesting maintaining enforceability. Continuous patent monitoring is vital for assessing patent life and infringement risks.

Infringement and Enforcement Considerations

Given its scope, the patent may face challenges if generic firms develop similar compounds or formulations. Enforcement depends on detailed claim interpretation and available evidence of infringement, emphasizing the importance of comprehensive patent documentation and technical expertise.


Specificity and Patentability within South African Law

Novelty and Inventive Step

The patent’s claims withstand scrutiny of novelty, facing no prior disclosures that anticipate the invention. Its inventive step derives from structural modifications or unique formulations not obvious to a person skilled in the art, supported by detailed specifications.

Industrial Applicability

Pharmaceutical patents inherently satisfy industrial applicability, as the invention addresses specific medical needs and can be manufactured or used in industry.

Compliance with Patentability Criteria

The patent complies with South African law, with claims clearly defining its scope, the specification adequately describing the invention, and the claims supported by detailed disclosures.


Challenges and Opportunities in the Patent Landscape

Legal Challenges

Potential challenges include:

  • Lack of inventive step if prior art surfaces that render the claims obvious.
  • Insufficient disclosure, which can threaten validity if the patent doesn't enable others to reproduce the invention.
  • Generic competition post-expiry or through active licensing.

Market and Regulatory Implications

Patent protection in South Africa provides a valuable window for commercialization, licensing, and partnership opportunities, especially amid rising healthcare demands. Regulatory pathways, such as the South African Health Products Regulatory Authority (SAHPRA), influence market entry and exclusivity period extensions.


Comparison with International Patent Strategies

South Africa’s patent laws provide a strategic foothold for pharmaceutical companies seeking regional protection. Filing in South Africa often coincides with global patent families, leveraging patent term extensions or data exclusivity tailored to local regulatory regimes.

Furthermore, South Africa’s compliance with international treaties eases patent filing through the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT), streamlining protection across multiple markets. Patent ZA200607602, if part of a broader family, enhances global market competitiveness.


Key Takeaways

  • Claims are precise yet sufficiently broad, encompassing specific compounds, formulations, and methods, aligning with South African patent standards.
  • The patent enjoys a strong position given its novelty and inventive step, but must be vigilantly monitored against potential challenges and competing patents.
  • The legal landscape favors patent enforcement, provided claims are supported, and infringement is demonstrable.
  • Strategic patent management involves leveraging the patent family, assessing freedom-to-operate, and aligning with international filings.
  • Continuous innovation, complemented by diligent patent litigation and licensing strategies, underpins sustainable commercial advantage in South Africa’s pharmaceutical sector.

5 FAQs

  1. What is the primary focus of patent ZA200607602?
    The patent covers a specific pharmaceutical compound, its formulations, and therapeutic use, aimed at providing protection for innovative drug development.

  2. How broad are the claims in this patent?
    Claims vary from specific chemical entities to broader formulations and methods, balancing patent scope with defensibility under South African law.

  3. Can this patent be challenged or invalidated?
    Yes, potential grounds include lack of novelty, obviousness, or insufficient disclosure. Ongoing monitoring of the patent landscape is essential for defensive and offensive strategies.

  4. What is the typical duration of protection for this patent in South Africa?
    The patent grants protection for 20 years from the filing date, subject to annual renewal fees and the absence of valid challenges.

  5. How does this patent fit into the global pharmaceutical patent landscape?
    It likely forms part of a patent family filed in multiple jurisdictions, supporting regional and global commercialization efforts and strengthening market positioning.


References

  1. South African Patent Office (CIPC). Patent Register.
  2. Patent Act No. 57 of 1978, Republic of South Africa.
  3. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT).
  4. South African Patent Law jurisprudence and guidelines.
  5. Industry reports on pharmaceutical patent filings in South Africa.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.