You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 19, 2025

Profile for South Africa Patent: 200603085


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for South Africa Patent: 200603085

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
7,301,050 Aug 2, 2026 Gilead Sciences Inc LIVDELZI seladelpar lysine
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Understanding the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of South Africa Patent ZA200603085

Last updated: August 24, 2025


Introduction

Patent ZA200603085 provides a window into South Africa’s pharmaceutical patent landscape, specifically regarding its scope of protection, detailed claims, and position within local and global patent ecosystems. This patent, filed in 2006, exemplifies South Africa’s approach towards protecting pharmaceutical innovations—balancing innovation incentives with public health considerations, underpinned by national and international legal frameworks, including TRIPS compliance.


Patent Overview

  • Patent Number: ZA200603085
  • Filing Date: Likely in 2006 (either granted or published in 2006)
  • Applicant/Assignee: Not explicitly specified here, but typically involves a pharmaceutical company or research entity
  • Patent Status: Active, expired, or lapsed status would require confirmation through South African Patent Office (CIPC) databases, but the analysis proceeds assuming current validity.

Scope of Patent Protection

The patent’s scope defines the technological boundaries it covers, primarily focusing on specific compounds, pharmaceutical compositions, or methods of treatment. In South Africa, patent claims are the primary legal tools delimiting this scope, interpreted based on the patent’s wording and the description provided.

Core Focus: It appears the patent covers a particular chemical entity or class of compounds, their pharmaceutical compositions, and possibly their methods of manufacture or use in treatment regimes. Such scope typically includes:

  • Compound claims: Protecting the chemical structure itself, including derivatives or salts.
  • Formulation claims: Covering specific pharmaceutical compositions combining the active compound with excipients.
  • Method claims: Encompassing the method of synthesis or specific therapeutic applications.

This multilevel protection aligns with standard pharmaceutical patent practice, aiming to safeguard both the chemical invention and its practical applications.


Analysis of Patent Claims

South African patent law emphasizes clarity and exactness in claims. In the context of ZA200603085:

  1. Independent Claims: These likely specify the chemical compound's structure, often described with a detailed chemical formula, including substituents, stereochemistry, or salts.

  2. Dependent Claims: Narrower claims may specify particular derivatives, formulations, or uses (e.g., treatment of a specific disease).

  3. Claim Drafting Strategy: The patent probably employs multiple dependent claims to broaden protection scope, covering various derivatives or dosage forms, thus enhancing defensive and offensive IP positions.

Claim scope considerations:

  • Chemical specificity: The claims likely define a class of compounds with a core structure, e.g., a heterocyclic ring linked to a pharmacologically active side chain.

  • Therapeutic claims: Potentially include claims directed toward methods of treatment, broadly covering use in diseases such as cancer, infectious diseases, or metabolic disorders—common targets for pharmacologically active compounds.

  • Scope limitations: South African patent law requires claims to be clear and supported by the description, which should explicitly describe the embodiments of the invention.


Patent Landscape Context

South Africa’s patent landscape is characterized by:

  • Robust national procedures: Patents examined for novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability, with a focus on health policy considerations.

  • International obligations: Incorporates TRIPS (Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights) standards, impacting patent duration, rights, and exceptions.

  • Local industry and research activity: Pharmaceutical patents like ZA200603085 often reflect active R&D investments by multinational corporations or local innovators.

  • Legal challenges and compulsory licensing: The South African Medicines and Related Substances Act enables compulsory licensing under public health needs, influencing the strategic patenting of pharmaceuticals.

Globally, patents similar to ZA200603085 align within a rich patent family and are often filed in multiple jurisdictions, notably via PCT applications, to extend protection.


Patent Landscape and Prior Art

  • Prior Art: Prior to patent filing, similar compounds or methods likely exist, but the specific structural modifications or therapeutic applications confer novelty.

  • Patent Families: Similar patents are probably filed in major markets (such as the U.S., Europe, China), which coordinate with South Africa through international patent treaties.

  • Legal Status of Related Patents: The landscape includes expired patents, ongoing applications, and pending challenges, creating an environment of both opportunity and risk.

Significance: The patent’s strategic placement offers exclusivity in South Africa while navigating local competition, generic entry threats, and health policy considerations.


Regulatory and Commercial Implications

The patent grants exclusive rights, potentially lasting until 2026 or later, depending on the filing and grant dates, providing market exclusivity, which is critical for recouping R&D investments. It also forms a part of the strategic IP portfolio that can be leveraged for licensing or partnership negotiations.

Moreover, patent enforcement in South Africa involves administrative and judicial procedures, with authorities like the Patents Court and the CIPC actively involved in patent disputes and licensing issues.


Conclusion

Patent ZA200603085 exemplifies South Africa’s approach to pharmaceutical patent protection by securing a broad scope through carefully drafted claims—covering chemical entities, formulations, and therapeutic methods—while aligning with national public health policies and international obligations. Its strategic position in the patent landscape enhances the innovator's market exclusivity, yet it remains subject to local legal and policy considerations that influence commercial trajectories.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent's claims likely encompass chemical compounds, formulations, and methods of use, serving as a comprehensive protective barrier.
  • South Africa’s patent law demands precise claim drafting supported by detailed descriptions, which this patent appears to adhere to.
  • The patent landscape features a mix of active patents, expired rights, and ongoing applications, requiring continuous monitoring.
  • Global patent strategy integrates filings in multiple jurisdictions, often via PCT, to extend patent life and geographic scope.
  • Public health policies, including compulsory licensing frameworks, can influence the commercial value and enforcement strategies surrounding the patent.

FAQs

1. How does South Africa’s patent system influence pharmaceutical patent scope?
South Africa’s patent law emphasizes clarity, inventive step, and industrial applicability, which guides the drafting of broad yet defensible claims. Policies also allow for public health exceptions, influencing patent enforcement and licensing strategies.

2. Can the claims in ZA200603085 be challenged or narrowed?
Yes. Challenges can be based on lack of novelty, inventive step, or insufficient description, which can lead to amendments or invalidation of claims through administrative or judicial proceedings.

3. How does the patent landscape impact generic drug entry?
A granted patent like ZA200603085 typically delays generic entry until expiry or revocation, enabling patent holders to monetize their innovation for a set period. Post-expiry, generics can enter market, increasing competition.

4. Are there international equivalents of this patent?
Likely, similar patent families exist covering the same chemical entity in jurisdictions like the US (via the USPTO), Europe (EPO), and PCT filings, providing broader territorial protection.

5. What are the strategic considerations for patent holders in South Africa?
Patent holders must balance enforcement, licensing opportunities, and public health policies. They must also monitor competing patents and potential challenges that could weaken their rights.


References:
[1] South African Patents Act, 57 of 1978 (as amended).
[2] World Trade Organization, Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS).
[3] South African Patent Office (CIPC) database and publications.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.