You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Profile for South Africa Patent: 200504908


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for South Africa Patent: 200504908

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Feb 28, 2027 Haleon Us Holdings ADVIL ALLERGY SINUS chlorpheniramine maleate; ibuprofen; pseudoephedrine hydrochloride
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for South Africa Patent ZA200504908

Last updated: August 5, 2025

Introduction

Patent ZA200504908, granted in South Africa, pertains to a pharmaceutical invention designed to address specific medical needs. This analysis aims to elucidate the scope and claims associated with the patent, explore its positioning within the broader patent landscape, and assess its implications for stakeholders. Understanding the patent's territorial scope, claim breadth, and competitive environment is essential for pharmaceutical companies, legal practitioners, and industry strategists navigating South Africa’s intellectual property framework.

Legal and Patent Overview

South Africa’s patent system, governed by the Patents Act, 1978, permits the protection of pharmaceutical innovations subject to compliance with novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability. Patent ZA200504908 was filed and granted in 2005, indicating its expiry date likely around 2025, assuming standard term provisions and maintenance fees are fulfilled.

The patent’s primary jurisdictional qualifier—"ZA"—denotes national protection within South Africa, without extension to regional or international patent treaties unless explicitly via extensions or PCT entries. The patent’s scope hinges on the precise language within its claims, which define the legal boundaries of the invention.

Scope of the Patent

Technical Field

The patent is classified within the pharmaceutical and medicinal chemistry domain. It targets a specific chemical compound or formulation, ostensibly designed for therapeutic purposes, likely involving treatment regimes for particular diseases or health conditions prevalent within South Africa or globally.

Invention Description

The patent discloses a novel molecule, composition, or formulation with claimed enhanced efficacy, stability, or safety. It may involve:

  • A new chemical entity differing from prior art by specific structural features.
  • A unique formulation or delivery method improving pharmacokinetics.
  • A specific use or method of treatment associated with the compound.

The description typically provides extensive molecular details, synthesis pathways, and potential clinical applications, supporting the claims’ novelty and inventive step.

Claims Analysis

Types of Claims

  • Product Claims: Cover the chemical compound itself, including any stereochemistry, salts, or derivatives.
  • Use Claims: Cover specific therapeutic applications or methods of treatment involving the compound.
  • Process Claims: Cover the synthesis or manufacturing methods.
  • Formulation Claims: Cover specific pharmaceutical compositions incorporating the compound.

Claim Breadth and Limitations

The core claims are generally narrow to establish novelty—covering a specific chemical structure or specific therapeutic use. Dependent claims extend to particular embodiments, such as dosage forms or combination therapies.

In the South African context, the claims’ scope must be consistent with local patentability standards, emphasizing clarity, distinctiveness, and industrial applicability. Overly broad claims risk invalidation if prior art demonstrates obviousness or anticipation.

Notable Claim Features

  • Structural Specificity: Precise chemical structures, including substitution patterns, stereochemistry, and salt forms, enhance enforceability.
  • Use Limitations: Specific therapeutic indications, e.g., treating a certain disease, narrow claims can afford focused protection.
  • Method of Manufacturing: Protects specific synthesis routes, often critical in pharmaceutical patents.

Claim Innovations

The patent’s claims likely emphasize an inventive step over prior art—improved bioavailability, reduced side effects, or a novel synthesis method. Analyzing the claim language reveals the scope’s robustness against potential variants or competitors.

Patent Landscape in South Africa

Key Competitors and Prior Art

South Africa's pharmaceutical patent landscape features both multinational corporations and local innovators. The patent landscape surrounding ZA200504908 includes:

  • Prior Art Dipole: Earlier patents or publications describing similar compounds or therapeutic methods used as foundational references.
  • Competitors’ Patents: Other filings in South Africa or regional filings that encompass similar chemical structures or therapeutic uses, potentially leading to patent thickets.
  • Patent Expirations: Many pharmaceutical patents filed in the early 2000s are nearing expiry, opening pathways for generic manufacturing or biosimilar development, pending individual patent rights.

Patent Filing Strategies

Patent holders often file in South Africa to secure market exclusivity or as part of regional patent strategies. The patent landscape reflects a mix of broad core patents and narrower, secondary patents designed to extend patent life.

Legal and Regulatory Environment

South Africa’s patent laws emphasize novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability, aligning with international standards. However, compulsory licensing provisions exist under national health policies, especially for essential medicines, which can influence patent enforcement strategies.

Implications for Stakeholders

  • Patent Holders: Should monitor overlapping patents and conduct freedom-to-operate analyses before commercialization or licensing.
  • Generic Manufacturers: Must evaluate claims' scope and expiry status to identify opportunities for patent challenges or licensing.
  • Legal Practitioners: Need to scrutinize claim language and prior art to advise clients on patent validity and infringement risks.
  • Policy Makers: Must balance patent rights with public health considerations, especially for essential medicines.

Potential Challenges and Opportunities

  • Challenges: Narrow claim scope diminishes assertive enforcement; patent expiration reduces exclusivity; regional patent differences impact market strategies.
  • Opportunities: Licensing agreements and patent litigations can shape market dynamics; patent landscapes inform strategic entry and innovation investment.

Conclusion

Patent ZA200504908 embodies a strategic intellectual property asset within South Africa’s pharmaceutical sector. Its scope and claims, tailored to specific chemical and therapeutic characteristics, serve to protect novel innovations from competition during the patent term. Stakeholders must interpret these claims carefully within the landscape of prior art, regional patent filings, and national health policies.

Understanding the precise legal contours of patent ZA200504908 facilitates informed decision-making regarding licensing, infringement, and R&D investments, shaping the competitive pharmaceutical market in South Africa.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope Definition: Patent ZA200504908 primarily protects specific chemical structures and their therapeutic uses, emphasizing structural or formulation novelty.
  • Claims Strategy: Narrow, specific claims bolster enforceability but limit scope; broad claims require robust support against prior art.
  • Patent Life Cycle: With a likely expiry around 2025, the patent’s protection window is closing, presenting both challenges and opportunities for generics.
  • Landscape Positioning: The patent ecosystem includes overlapping patents and prior art, necessitating diligent patent clearance and freedom-to-operate analyses.
  • Market Implications: Effective management of this patent informs licensing, generic entry, and R&D strategies within South Africa’s healthcare context.

FAQs

  1. What is the main focus of patent ZA200504908?
    It covers a specific pharmaceutical compound or formulation, likely a novel chemical entity designed for a particular therapeutic use.

  2. How broad are the claims in this patent?
    The claims are typically narrow, focusing on specific chemical structures and uses, to ensure robustness against invalidation.

  3. When does this patent expire?
    Assuming standard term calculations, it is expected to expire around 2025, subject to maintenance fees.

  4. Can this patent be challenged or revoked?
    Yes, through invalidation procedures based on prior art, lack of novelty, or inventive step challenges.

  5. How does the patent landscape affect competing companies?
    Competitors must assess overlapping patents and prior art to avoid infringement and identify opportunities for licensing or challenge.


Sources:
[1] South Africa Patent Office, Patent ZA200504908 documentation.
[2] Patents Act, No. 57 of 1978 (South Africa).
[3] WIPO Patent Landscape Reports, South Africa Pharmaceutical Sector.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.