You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 17, 2025

Profile for Yugoslavia Patent: 92901


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Yugoslavia Patent: 92901

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Oct 29, 2025 Pf Prism Cv INLYTA axitinib
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Title: In-Depth Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Yugoslavia Patent YU92901

Last updated: August 14, 2025


Introduction

Patent YU92901 represents an intellectual property asset filed within the former Yugoslavian jurisdiction, which holds significance for stakeholders involved in pharmaceutical innovation and regional licensing. Although the patent landscape in Yugoslavia has undergone substantial change following the country's dissolution, the patent details, scope, and legacy remain relevant for understanding its potential influence on regional and international markets. This analysis explores the scope and claims of YU92901 and contextualizes its position within the broader patent landscape of medicinal compounds and formulations related to the patent family or similar subject matter.


Historical Context and Patent Background

Yugoslavia's patent system, governed until 1992 by its national patent law, was aligned with European standards, fostering innovation in pharmaceuticals. Post-dissolution, patent rights held under Yugoslavia generally migrated to successor states, including Serbia, Croatia, Slovenia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Montenegro, and North Macedonia, either through succession or became dormant.

Patent YU92901 was likely filed in the late 20th century, during a period of active pharmaceutical R&D, aiming to protect a novel medicinal compound, formulation, or process. Understanding its claims involves dissecting its core inventive elements, scope, and how it fits into the broader patent landscape during that era.


Scope of Patent YU92901

Scope and Purpose

The scope of a patent defines the boundaries of exclusivity granted to the patent holder, notably through its claims. YU92901's scope hinges on its claims' breadth—whether they are broad, covering a wide class of compounds, or narrow, focusing on a specific molecule or process.

Based on typical pharmaceutical patents of that period, the scope of YU92901 possibly encompassed:

  • Chemical Composition: A specific therapeutic molecule with patented structural features or functional groups.
  • Method of Production: A novel synthesis process improving yield, purity, or cost-efficiency.
  • Therapeutic Use: A specific medical application or indication, e.g., treating a particular disease state.
  • Formulation and Delivery: Novel pharmaceutical formulations, including dosage forms, excipients, or delivery mechanisms.

The extent of patent protection is largely determined by how comprehensively the claims cover these aspects.

Claims Analysis

Although the exact text of YU92901 is unavailable in public databases, typical claims can be categorized into:

  • Independent Claims: Core claims defining the essence of the invention, such as a new compound, process, or formulation.
  • Dependent Claims: Sub-claims adding specific limitations, such as particular substituents, methods, or uses.

Assuming a typical pharmaceutical patent structure, YU92901's claims probably covered:

  • The chemical structure of a novel compound or derivatives.
  • A specific process for synthesizing the compound with unique reagents, catalysts, or conditions.
  • Therapeutic methods employing the compound for particular indications.
  • Pharmaceutical compositions containing the compound and auxiliary excipients.

The breadth and specificity of these claims influence their enforceability and potential for licensing or litigation.


Patent Landscape Analysis

Regional and International Patent Status

Post-Yugoslavia, the patent landscape would have involved:

  • National Courts: Rights and enforcement primarily within successor states.
  • European Patent Office (EPO): If the patent owner sought regional protection via the European Patent Convention (EPC), similar patents might exist.
  • World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO): International applications, such as PCT filings, might extend protection.

Considering the age and jurisdiction, it is likely YU92901 either lapsed, was transferred, or remains active as a legacy patent in some jurisdictions.

Patents Citing or Cited by YU92901

A crucial aspect of assessing patent landscape involves citation analysis:

  • Backward Citations: Prior art references that YU92901 builds upon—influencing its novelty.
  • Forward Citations: Later patents that cite YU92901, indicating its influence or technological relevance.

Analysis through patent databases (e.g., EPO espacenet, WIPO PATENTSCOPE) would reveal related patents, such as derivatives or improved formulations under similar patent families.

Key Patent Families

The patent family around YU92901 might include:

  • Application P family: Covering core compounds or processes.
  • Regional family: Patents filed in major markets, including Europe, the US, Russia, and successor states.
  • Improvement patents: Subsequent patents improving or modifying the original invention.

This family structure influences the freedom-to-operate landscape and potential licensing opportunities.


Legal and Patent Life Considerations

Considering the filing date (assumed late 20th century), the patent likely had a standard 20-year term, possibly expired or nearing expiry, which influences market opportunities.

Divergent legal treatment across successor states complicates enforcement; many patents may have become invalid or unenforceable due to non-maintenance or procedural lapses.


Implications for Current Market and R&D

  • Innovation Gap: If YU92901 protected a novel active ingredient, subsequent patent filings in the same class may now exist, shaping competitors' R&D strategies.
  • Legal Status in Successor States: Determining whether the patent remains valid or has been maintained is critical for licensing or litigation.
  • Potential for Re-Patenting: Because of jurisdictional changes, patent owners might seek to refile or enforce rights via regional routes such as EPC.

Conclusion and Strategic Outlook

Patent YU92901 embodies a significant facet of Yugoslav pharmaceutical innovation, its claims likely covering a novel compound or process with a broad or specific scope. While the patent’s legal enforceability may be limited through its jurisdictional history, its influence persists in how regional and international patent landscapes have evolved.

Entities interested in therapeutic compounds originating from or related to YU92901 should perform comprehensive patent searches in successor states and international databases. Evaluation of patent family members, citation networks, and current status is essential in determining freedom-to-operate, licensing potential, or the need for new patent filings.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope of Claims: Likely centered on a novel chemical entity, process, or formulation, with the scope determined by claim language and patent specifications.
  • Patent Landscape: Involves a complex network of national and regional patents, with possible legacy effects in successor states.
  • Legal Status: Many Yugoslav patents face lapsing or legal challenges due to jurisdictional changes; current enforceability requires verification.
  • Strategic Significance: Understanding the patent landscape around YU92901 is vital for pharmaceutical R&D, licensing, and market entry strategies in the region.
  • Recent Developments: New patent filings in the same class or related fields can impact the freedom to operate, underscoring the need for ongoing patent landscape monitoring.

FAQs

  1. What is the primary area of protection offered by Yugoslavia patent YU92901?
    While specifics depend on its actual claims, it likely protected a novel pharmaceutical compound, process, or formulation aligned with typical medicinal patents of its era.

  2. Does YU92901 still hold enforceable rights today?
    Its enforceability depends on jurisdictional status and maintenance, which requires verification in successor states or international patent databases.

  3. How can I determine if YU92901 has been cited by subsequent patents?
    Utilizing patent databases such as EPO espacenet or WIPO PATENTSCOPE, you can conduct citation searches to track forward and backward citations related to YU92901.

  4. Are there similar patents or patent families related to YU92901?
    Yes, patent families typically include related filings across jurisdictions. A comprehensive search can identify similar or derivative patents in regional or international patent offices.

  5. What strategic considerations should I have regarding patents from the former Yugoslavia?
    Given the jurisdictional changes, it is vital to verify current legal statuses, identify active patent family members, and assess regional patent landscapes before commercialization.


References

  1. [1] European Patent Office (EPO). Patent information portal.
  2. [2] WIPO PATENTSCOPE database.
  3. [3] National patent registries of successor states of Yugoslavia.
  4. [4] Patent document YU92901 (hypothetical or available in regional archives).
  5. [5] Regional patent law and history of Yugoslavian patent system.

Note: Specific patent document access requires searching national or international patent databases; this analysis is based on typical patent structures and historic context.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.