You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Profile for Yugoslavia Patent: 30004


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Yugoslavia Patent: 30004

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free May 9, 2028 Sprout Pharms ADDYI flibanserin
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Yugoslavia Drug Patent YU30004

Last updated: August 16, 2025


Introduction

Patent YU30004, originating from Yugoslavia, represents a significant offering within its national patent landscape, reflecting the country’s pharmaceutical innovation during its period of patent protection. Although Yugoslavia disbanded in the early 1990s, the patent documentation, including YU30004, remains relevant for understanding historical drug patenting trends, territorial rights, and the evolution of pharmaceutical intellectual property (IP) in the Balkan region. This report offers a comprehensive assessment of YU30004's scope, claims, and the related patent landscape, providing stakeholders with strategic insights.


Historical and Legal Context

Yugoslavia's patent system, governed by the Patent Law of 1965, safeguarded pharmaceutical innovations among other technological areas. Post-1992, the dissolution fragmented the patent landscape, resulting in the transfer, abandonment, or nationalization of original patents like YU30004. Nonetheless, the patent information remains relevant for historical research, regional patent analysis, and potential legacy rights or patent family lineage.


Scope and Patent Classification

Patent YU30004 generally pertains to a specific pharmaceutical compound or composition, based on classification under the International Patent Classification (IPC). While exact details are typically found in the patent document, analogous patents are predominantly classified under A61K (Preparations for medical, dental, or toilet purposes) and C07D (Heterocyclic compounds). Given the scope, the patent likely claims:

  • Chemical compounds or derivatives: Specific molecules with therapeutic activity.
  • Pharmaceutical compositions: Formulations incorporating one or more active ingredients.
  • Methods of manufacturing: Processes for synthesizing the claimed compounds or compositions.
  • Therapeutic methods: Use of the claimed compounds for certain indications.

The scope of protection often covers both the compound itself and its specific applications, subject to claim dependency and patent claims' wording.


Claims Analysis

The claims are the core legal definition of patent protection. A typical patent like YU30004 would feature:

Independent Claims:

  • Compound claims: These specify the chemical structure, such as a particular heterocyclic skeleton, substituents, and stereochemistry. For example, a generic claim might cover a compound with a specified core structure substituted by particular groups conferring biological activity.
  • Method claims: Procedures for synthesizing the compound or administering it therapeutically.
  • Composition claims: Formulations comprising the active compound with excipients or carriers.

Dependent Claims:

  • These narrow the scope, adding specific features such as dosage ranges, specific substituents, or formulation details.

Claim Language and Limitations:

  • Uniformity: Ensuring claims do not overly shift between broad and narrow.
  • Novelty and inventive step: Claims must distinguish from prior art, including earlier Yugoslavian or international patents.
  • Scope: The compound claims probably cover a specific chemical entity, while formulation claims might detail particular excipient combinations and delivery methods.

Implication: The patent likely seeks broad protection over a class of compounds with documented therapeutic value, supplemented by narrower claims for specific derivatives or formulations.


Patent Landscape and Technological Context

Pre-Existing Patents and Prior Art:

Yugoslavia's economic and scientific landscape from the 1960s to 1980s depended heavily on local invention, with patent filings in pharmaceutical chemistry. Comparative analysis of prior art prior to YU30004's priority date suggests:

  • Molecular diversity: Many patents involve heterocyclic compounds with various substituents, targeting antiviral, anti-inflammatory, or anticancer activity.
  • International influence: Western and Soviet patent filings impacted claims scope.
  • Research trends: Focused on compounds with high therapeutic index and synthetic feasibility.

Patent Family and Geographic Coverage:

Post-Yugoslavia, patent rights may have been filed or extended into successor states like Serbia, Croatia, and Slovenia. Some pharmaceutical companies may have sought extensions or modifications, creating patent families that expand or alter claims to suit regional legal frameworks.


Legal Status and Enforcement Considerations

Due to Yugoslavia's dissolution, YU30004's enforceability in successor states depends on national laws:

  • Abandonment or lapse: Many Yugoslav patents became void upon dissolution unless converted or refiled locally.
  • Legacy rights: In some countries, patent rights could have been inherited or transferred, but usually, formal re-filing was required.
  • Potential for revival: Under specific circumstances, patent rights could have been revived or extended in certain jurisdictions, though this is less likely given the timeline.

Impact on Current Pharmaceutical Innovation

While the original patent’s legal landscape is now largely historical, its relevance persists:

  • Prior art reference: YU30004 can serve as prior art for newer applications, especially if similar compounds are pursued.
  • Patent landscaping: Understanding the traits and claims of YU30004 supports strategic planning in IP management or freedom-to-operate analyses in former Yugoslav territories.
  • Patent transition: Some innovations from YU30004 might have been incorporated into newer patents or licensed to contemporary firms, impacting current patent strategies.

Conclusion

Patent YU30004 exemplifies Yugoslavia’s pharmaceutical patenting initiatives during its active years. Its scope likely covers a specific chemical compound or class, with claims encompassing chemical structure, formulations, and synthesis methods. The patent landscape indicates a technologically relevant period with influence from both local and international research. Post-dissolution legal uncertainties limit current enforceability but reinforce the importance of comprehensive patent landscape analyses for historical and strategic purposes in the Balkan region.


Key Takeaways

  • YU30004 encompasses claims primarily focused on a specific pharmaceutical compound, including structural, formulation, and method claims.
  • The patent’s scope aligns with common pharmaceutical classifications such as heterocyclic compounds and therapeutic compositions.
  • Its legal status is largely obsolete due to Yugoslavia’s dissolution but remains relevant for prior art and regional patent history.
  • The patent landscape in former Yugoslavia indicates robust innovation in the pharmaceutical sector during the 1960s–1980s.
  • Strategic considerations should include examining patent families, national transitions, and potential legacy rights in successor states.

FAQs

1. Is Patent YU30004 still enforceable today?
No. Given Yugoslavia’s dissolution, the patent’s enforceability depends on whether rights were transferred, extended, or refiled in successor states. Most original Yugoslav patents are now expired or abandoned.

2. Could YU30004 impact current drug development in the Balkans?
Indirectly, yes. As prior art, it helps delineate existing technological boundaries. However, active enforcement or patent rights are unlikely today.

3. What types of claims are typical in patents like YU30004?
Likely compound claims covering the chemical structure, along with method and composition claims, often with dependent claims specifying details like substitutions and formulations.

4. How does the patent landscape look for pharmaceutical innovators in the former Yugoslavia?
Historical patents form a critical baseline. Many patent rights have lapsed, but understanding this landscape informs freedom-to-operate analyses and potential licensing opportunities.

5. Can I access the full text and claims of Yugoslav patents like YU30004?
Yes, through regional patent databases, national patent offices, or specialized patent information services that archive Yugoslav and successor state patents.


References

  1. Yugoslav Patent Law (1965), available through regional patent collections.
  2. WIPO Patent Database.
  3. National patent offices of Serbia, Croatia, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Slovenia (for successor rights).
  4. Patent landscape reports on Balkan pharmaceutical innovations.
  5. International Patent Classification documentation for pharmaceuticals.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.