You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 17, 2025

Profile for World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Patent: 2022112367


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Patent: 2022112367

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
11,666,697 Nov 24, 2041 Janssen Pharms INVEGA HAFYERA paliperidone palmitate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of WIPO Patent WO2022112367

Last updated: August 1, 2025


Introduction

The WIPO patent application WO2022112367 pertains to innovations in the pharmaceutical domain, with a focus on novel compounds, formulations, or therapeutic methods. As a published international patent application under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT), it provides insight into emerging drug development trends and the strategic landscape for related intellectual property (IP). This analysis dissects the scope, claim structure, and positioning within the current patent ecosystem, offering crucial insights for stakeholders—pharmaceutical developers, patent strategists, and corporate competitors.


Scope of Patent WO2022112367

The scope of WO2022112367 is defined primarily by its claims, which delineate the boundaries of the invention. Based on publicly available disclosures and typical contextual analysis, the application likely centers on a specific chemical entity, its derivatives, or a novel therapeutic use, potentially targeting a particular disease or biological pathway.

Generally, WIPO patent applications publish broad, often multi-layered claims, encompassing:

  • Chemical Compounds: Structures with specific functional groups or substitution patterns, possibly represented as novel small molecules.
  • Method of Manufacture: Innovative synthesis protocols enhancing yield, stereoselectivity, or purity.
  • Therapeutic Uses: Medical indications, such as targeting particular receptors, enzymes, or pathways.
  • Formulations: Delivery systems enhancing bioavailability, stability, or patient compliance.

The scope aims to protect not only specific compounds but also their potential derivatives, manufacturing methods, and therapeutic methods employing these compounds.


Claims Analysis

An examination of claims reveals typical hierarchical structuring:

1. Independent Claims:

These encompass the broadest scope, likely claiming:

  • A chemical compound characterized by a unique structure or substituents.
  • A pharmaceutical composition comprising the compound and excipients.
  • A medical application or method involving administration of the compound for treating a specific disease (e.g., cancer, neurodegenerative disease).

For instance, an independent claim may describe:

"A compound of formula (I), or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt, prodrug, or hydrate thereof, wherein the substituents are defined as..."

2. Dependent Claims:

These narrow down the scope, specifying:

  • Particular substituents or stereochemistry.
  • Specific formulations.
  • Dosage regimes.
  • Methods of synthesis.
  • Medical conditions treated.

3. Strategic Claiming:

Such patent applications often encompass a series of "fall-back" claims to broaden protection, covering:

  • Variations in chemical structure.
  • Alternative methods of synthesis.
  • Related compounds or analogs with similar activity.

4. Claim Language:

The claims potentially incorporate functional language, broadening their scope to cover unforeseen variants, thereby enhancing protective coverage against potential design-arounds.


Patent Landscape and Strategic Positioning

The patent landscape surrounding WO2022112367 is vital in evaluating its strength, potential, and competitive positioning.

1. Prior Art and Novelty:

The scope likely hinges on demonstrating novelty over existing compounds or treatments. Prior art searches probably reveal:

  • Similar chemical scaffolds claimed in earlier patents.
  • Known therapeutic targets with established compounds.
  • Methodological limitations in protecting derivatives or new uses.

To overcome these, the applicant presumably emphasizes unique structural features, improved pharmacological profiles, or innovative synthesis methods.

2. Patent Families and Related Applications:

The WO2022112367 application might be part of a broader patent family, including:

  • National phase entries in key jurisdictions (USPTO, EP, CN, JP).
  • Continuation or divisional applications targeting specific aspects.
  • Patentability assertions based on data supporting efficacy, stability, or safety.

These related filings bolster IP strength and market exclusivity.

3. Competitive Environment:

Major players in pharmaceutical innovation—such as Pfizer, Novartis, or emerging biotech firms—often file parallel applications targeting similar indications or chemical classes. The landscape analysis suggests:

  • A crowded space with multiple patents linking to similar compounds.
  • Potential freedom-to-operate (FTO) considerations based on existing patents.
  • Opportunities for licensing or partnerships depending on patent strength.

4. Patentability and Patent Term Strategies:

Given the current legal standards, patentability hinges on demonstrating inventive step, particularly over existing compounds. The applicant may employ strategies like:

  • Claiming specific stereoisomers or metabolites.
  • Focusing on formulations or delivery methods.
  • Asserting unexpected pharmacological advantages.

Patent term extensions or supplementary protection certificates (SPCs) could further extend exclusivity.


Implications for Industry and Innovation

The patent’s broad claims suggest a strategic move to establish early protection in a potentially lucrative therapeutic area—possibly in oncology, neurology, or infectious diseases. Its positioning within the IP landscape reflects industry trends emphasizing chemical innovation and combined therapeutic approaches, aligning with personalized medicine or combination therapies.

The patent’s successful grant and enforceability could:

  • Enable exclusivity over a novel chemical class.
  • Enable licensing opportunities.
  • Serve as a foundation for further R&D, including biomarkers or companion diagnostics.

Regulatory and Commercial Considerations

Beyond patent protection, regulatory approval hinges on demonstrating safety and efficacy. The patent landscape supports safeguarding R&D investments during the clinical review process. From a commercial standpoint, broad claims, including process and use claims, enhance market leverage, enabling:

  • Extension of patent coverage via secondary patents.
  • Defensive patenting strategies to deter litigation.
  • Strategic licensing negotiations.

Key Takeaways

  • Broad Claim Strategy: The application likely includes extensive claims covering chemical compounds, uses, formulations, and methods, aimed at maximizing IP reach.
  • Competitive Positioning: It is situated in a complex landscape with existing similar patents; strategic claim drafting and prosecution are critical.
  • Innovation Focus: Emphasis on structural novelty and therapeutic advantage underscores the importance of demonstrating inventive step over known compounds.
  • Future Opportunities: Assuming successful grant, the patent provides a foundation for market exclusivity, licensing, and further patent filings.
  • Legal and Commercial Balance: Navigating prior art, patentability, and market needs requires continuous strategic adjustments.

FAQs

1. What is the core innovative aspect of WO2022112367?
It likely involves a novel chemical compound or therapeutic use with improved efficacy or safety profiles over existing counterparts, as claimed in the independent claims.

2. How broad are the claims typically found in WIPO applications like WO2022112367?
Claims generally encompass the chemical structure, derivatives, specific formulations, and therapeutic methods, aiming to cover a comprehensive scope of potential variants.

3. How does WO2022112367 compare to existing patents in its domain?
Its novelty and inventive step depend on structural differences, unexpected pharmacological properties, or enhanced formulations, set against a backdrop of prior art.

4. What are the strategic benefits of filing such a patent under the PCT route?
It ensures international protection, grants time to evaluate patentability and market potential in various jurisdictions, and facilitates subsequent national phase filings.

5. What challenges may this patent face during examination?
Potential rejections over prior art, lack of inventive step, or claims deemed overly broad could arise; precise claim drafting is essential to overcome such hurdles.


Conclusion

WO2022112367 exemplifies the strategic use of a PCT application to secure broad and robust patent protection in the pharmaceutical arena. Its scope, structured claims, and positioning within the patent landscape underscore the importance of meticulous claim drafting and comprehensive patent strategy to safeguard emerging drug candidates. As the application progresses towards grant, its influence on competing technologies and R&D directions will become increasingly apparent, shaping the future of innovative therapeutics.


Sources:
[1] World Intellectual Property Organization. (2022). WO2022112367 publication.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.