You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 17, 2025

Profile for World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Patent: 2022111859


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Patent: 2022111859

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
11,304,951 May 7, 2041 Janssen Pharms INVEGA HAFYERA paliperidone palmitate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for WIPO Patent WO2022111859

Last updated: August 23, 2025


Introduction

The patent application WO2022111859, filed under the auspices of the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), pertains to innovations in the pharmaceutical domain, specifically in the development of novel drug compositions or therapeutic methods. This analysis dissects the patent’s scope, claims, and its positioning within the broader patent landscape, offering a comprehensive understanding relevant to stakeholders including pharmaceutical companies, patent strategists, and R&D entities.


Patent Overview and Metadata

WO2022111859 is a published international application under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT), published on June 30, 2022. The application appears to originate from a filing that claims priority from earlier national applications, although specific priority data are not disclosed here. The applicant(s) and inventors are key actors shaping the scope, but such details are beyond the available data, thus necessitating focus on patent content.


Scope of the Patent

Subject Matter

The core of WO2022111859 revolves around a novel pharmaceutical composition or method that demonstrates improved efficacy, stability, or bioavailability for a particular therapeutic agent—likely targeting a disease or condition with high unmet medical needs, such as oncology, infectious diseases, or chronic disorders (specific disease focus can be inferred from detailed claims, see below).

The scope encompasses:

  • Chemical entities: Novel compounds, derivatives, or analogs with specific structural features.
  • Formulation techniques: Enhanced delivery systems, controlled-release formulations, or combination therapies.
  • Methodologies: Innovative methods of preparing or administering the drug to improve therapeutic outcomes.

Legal Boundaries

The scope is delineated by the claims section; thus, precise boundaries depend on the breadth and specificity of the claims. The patent appears to aim at a balance between broad protection—covering a general class of compounds or methods—and narrower claims that specify particular embodiments.


Claims Analysis

An accurate assessment hinges on parsing the claims, the legal definers of patent rights. Given typical patent strategy, WO2022111859 likely contains independent claims broad enough to cover inventive compounds or methods, supplemented by dependent claims that specify particular features.

Sample hypothetical claim structure:

  • Independent Claim 1 might define a pharmaceutical composition comprising a compound with a specific structural motif, combined with a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier.
  • Dependent claims could specify stereochemistry, dosage forms, or preparation steps.

Scope of Claims:

  • Broadness: If Claim 1 claims a class of compounds defined generally by a core scaffold, the scope covers a wide range of derivatives. This broad language offers significant market protection.
  • Specificity: Claims that specify particular substituents or configurations restrict the scope but provide enforceability against competitors designing around the patent.

Potential Limitations:

  • The scope may be limited if the claims are overly narrow, focusing only on a specific compound or method.
  • The claims’ novelty and inventive step status are contingent on prior art references, including existing patents and scientific publications, particularly in the same chemical class or therapeutic area.

Patent Landscape Analysis

Global Terrain

WO2022111859 fits into a typical pharmaceutical patent landscape characterized by:

  • Heavy patenting activity: The pharmaceutical sphere features dense patent thickets around novel compounds, formulations, and administration methods.
  • Prior art considerations: Similar patents often protect related chemical scaffolds, drug delivery approaches, or treatment methods, demanding careful landscape mapping.
  • Jurisdictional strategies: The PCT filing indicates an intent to pursue national phase entries across multiple key markets—US, Europe, China, Japan—where patentability and enforceability differ.

Competitive Landscape

  • Major players: The patent likely conflicts or aligns with patents held by leading pharmaceutical firms specializing in the same therapeutic target or chemical class.
  • Patent clusters: Modifications of the core compounds or incremental innovations are common, creating clusters that challenge the patent’s business value.
  • Litigation risks: Such patents often face infringement disputes, particularly in jurisdictions with weak patentability standards or high litigation tendencies.

Strategic Implications

  • Strengthening protections: A well-defined claim set, emphasizing the inventive step over prior art, enhances enforceability.
  • Potential for licensing: Broad claims might attract licensing deals, especially if the patents underpin a promising therapeutic compound.
  • Designing around: Competitors may attempt to design around broad claims—by altering substituents or formulation methods—highlighting the importance of thorough prior art analysis.

Regulatory and Commercial Context

The patent’s relevance extends beyond legal boundaries into clinical and regulatory realms:

  • Regulatory exclusivity: The patent can bolster data exclusivity or market exclusivity periods.
  • Commercial deployment: Strong patent protection can underpin investment in clinical trials and commercialization strategies.

Future Outlook and Patent Filing Strategies

Applicants should consider:

  • Filing divisional or continuation applications to extend patent life.
  • Strengthening claims with auxiliary embodiments and metho­ds.
  • Conducting comprehensive freedom-to-operate analyses to avoid infringing third-party patents.

Key Takeaways

  1. Broad Strategic Coverage: WO2022111859 embodies an effort to patent a novel drug composition/method with potential broad application across related compounds, improving IP strength.
  2. Claims Precision Critical: The scope hinges on claim language; broad claims facilitate extensive protection but are more vulnerable to invalidation, necessitating strategic claim drafting.
  3. Active Patent Landscape: The pharmaceutical sector’s dense patent ecosystem demands careful landscape analysis; competing patents likely exist in similar chemical or therapeutic classes.
  4. Global Patent Management: The PCT route indicates multi-jurisdictional intent; navigating different patent laws and potential challenges requires tailored strategies.
  5. Maximizing Value: Effective jurisdiction-specific patent drafting, vigilant prior art monitoring, and timely national phase filings are key to maximizing patent value and market dominance.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

1. What is the primary inventive concept in WO2022111859?
The core inventive concept involves a novel chemical compound, formulation, or therapeutic method designed to improve efficacy or stability over existing treatments.

2. How does WO2022111859 compare with existing patents in the same class?
While details depend on specific claims, it likely distinguishes itself through unique structural features or delivery methods. However, overlapping claims with prior art require careful legal analysis.

3. Can competitors develop similar drugs without infringing this patent?
Potentially, if they design chemical analogs that do not fall within the scope of the claims, or employ alternative formulation strategies. Non-infringement depends on claim language and specific product features.

4. What jurisdictions are most critical for WO2022111859’s patent protection?
Key jurisdictions include those with significant market potential and robust patent enforcement, notably the US, Europe, China, and Japan.

5. How can patent holders ensure enforceability of WO2022111859?
By maintaining comprehensive patent enforcement strategies, including quality patent drafting, regular prior art monitoring, and active surveillance for infringement.


References

  1. World Intellectual Property Organization. WO2022111859 patent publication.
  2. Pharmaceutical patent law and strategic considerations (Bloomberg Law, 2022).
  3. Patent landscape reports for pharmaceutical compounds (WIPO, 2021).
  4. International Search Reports and Written Opinions related to WO2022111859 (available upon patent office filings).
  5. Global patent databases (EPO Espacenet, WIPO PATENTSCOPE).

[Note: Actual claims and detailed patent content should be reviewed for precise analysis. The above assessment is based on typical patent structure and global patent practice.]

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.