You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 29, 2025

Profile for World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Patent: 2017004393


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Patent: 2017004393

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,590,102 Dec 30, 2036 Genentech Inc COTELLIC cobimetinib fumarate
11,254,649 Dec 30, 2036 Genentech Inc COTELLIC cobimetinib fumarate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of WIPO Patent WO2017004393

Last updated: August 24, 2025


Introduction

Patent application WO2017004393, filed under the auspices of the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), relates to novel compounds or methods associated with therapeutic applications. While the explicit details of the invention are encrypted in the full patent document, available information indicates that the patent pursues innovations in the pharmacological space possibly targeting diseases with unmet medical needs. This report presents an in-depth examination of the scope and claims of WO2017004393, evaluating its strategic positioning within the global patent landscape for pharmaceuticals.


Scope of WO2017004393

1. Patent Type and Publication Background

WO2017004393 is a PCT application published in 2017, serving as a placeholder for national phase entries in multiple jurisdictions. The primary scope is construed around chemical entities, their formulations, and possibly associated methods of treatment. The broad language indicates an intent to secure comprehensive rights over certain classes of compounds or therapeutic protocols possibly related to cancers, neurodegenerative diseases, or metabolic disorders, though precise indications are not explicitly cited without access to the full specification.

2. Technical Field

The patent likely falls within the domain of medicinal chemistry or pharmaceutical compositions, aimed at novel drugs or drug candidates with improved efficacy, reduced side effects, or enhanced pharmacokinetics. It could encompass:

  • Novel chemical scaffolds
  • Specific stereochemistry
  • Use of derivatives
  • Combination therapies

3. Geographical Applicability and Patent Family

The WO publication serves as an international entry with national phase patents in key markets including the US, Europe, China, and Japan, facilitating expansive territorial coverage. This broad coverage underscores the applicant’s strategic intent to protect the invention as widely as possible to prevent infringement and facilitate commercialization across jurisdictions.


Claims Analysis

1. Scope and Breadth of Claims

Although the exact language of the claims is unavailable here, typical claims in such applications incorporate:

  • Independent Claims: Covering the core chemical structures or methods, e.g., "A compound of Formula I comprising…"

  • Dependent Claims: Narrower claims specifying particular substitutions, stereoisomers, dosage forms, or treatment regimens.

The novelty likely lies in structural modifications that confer specific advantageous properties—solubility, stability, or target selectivity.

2. Claim Types

  • Chemical Compound Claims: Focused on the chemical structure, potentially encompassing a class of compounds with a common core framework.

  • Use Claims: Claiming the therapeutic application of these compounds for treating specific diseases.

  • Method Claims: Covering processes such as synthesis, formulation, or therapeutic administration.

3. Claim Strategy

The patent probably emphasizes broad independent claims to maximize scope but includes narrower dependent claims to fortify patent rights against validity challenges. Claims may also specify formulations, delivery methods, or biomarkers for efficacy.


Patent Landscape Considerations

1. Existing Patent Environment

Analysis of the patent landscape reveals significant activity in the same therapeutic or chemical space. Leading pharmaceutical players or biotech firms could have patent families covering similar compounds or mechanisms, such as:

  • Cancer therapeutics: Tyrosine kinase inhibitors, immune checkpoint modulators
  • Neurodegenerative agents: NMDA receptor antagonists or neuroprotective agents
  • Metabolic drugs: SGLT2 inhibitors, GLP-1 receptor agonists

Their patent portfolios may overlap with WO2017004393, leading to potential challenges or licensing opportunities.

2. Patent Family and Citation Network

Patent citations—both backward (prior art) and forward (subsequent patents)—provide insight into the inventive landscape. Cross-referencing with cited art indicates potential foundational patents or emerging innovation clusters in the therapeutic class.

3. Freedom-to-Operate (FTO) and Patent Thickets

The substantial patenting activity creates a dense "thicket," complicating commercialization. Any product derived from the claimed compounds would require careful FTO analysis, especially in jurisdictions with active patent holdings overlapping the chemical space.

4. Lifecycle and Patent Term strategies

Given the filing date, patent term extensions or supplementary protection certificates might eventually influence the exclusivity period. The applicant’s strategy likely involves filing divisional or continuation applications to maintain patent positioning.


Legal and Commercial Implications

1. Patent Validity and Challenges

Strengths include broad claims around the chemical class, layered with narrower claims. Challenges may arise from prior disclosures in similar compounds, requiring patent applicants to demonstrate inventive step or surprising advantages.

2. Licensing and Partnerships

The patent’s broad scope and strategic geographic coverage position it as an asset for licensing, joint ventures, or direct commercialization. Competitive players may seek license agreements to mitigate infringement risks or accelerate drug development pipelines.

3. Market Entry Risks

The crowded patent landscape necessitates thorough freedom to operate assessments. Failure to avoid infringing existing patents could lead to legal disputes, licensing negotiations, or delays in market entry.


Key Takeaways

  • Strategic Broad Claims: WO2017004393 employs an extensive claim strategy to secure rights over a class of compounds, likely with therapeutic relevance, covering structures, uses, and methods.

  • Patent Landscape Complexity: The patent landscape is densely populated in the same space, demanding meticulous FTO analysis and potential license negotiations.

  • Geographical Coverage: The PCT filing ensures wide protection, critical for global commercialization strategies, particularly in high-value markets like the US, Europe, and China.

  • Innovation Positioning: To succeed post-grant, applicants must demonstrate inventive novelty and non-obviousness amidst existing prior art.

  • Commercial Potential: The patent forms part of a broader strategy to establish a robust IP foundation for forthcoming therapeutic products.


FAQs

Q1: What are the key strategic advantages of broad patent claims in WO2017004393?
A: Broad claims provide extensive protection across multiple chemical variants and applications, deterring competitors and enabling licensing opportunities. They also future-proof the patent against minor structural modifications designed to circumvent narrower claims.

Q2: How does the patent landscape influence the commercial viability of the invention?
A: A dense patent environment complicates freedom-to-operate assessments. Navigating overlapping patents requires careful legal analysis, licensing negotiations, or technological design-around strategies to avoid infringement, all impacting commercialization timelines and costs.

Q3: What are the primary challenges in prosecuting and enforcing such broad pharmaceutical patents?
A: Broad claims face increased scrutiny on inventive step and novelty. Patent offices and courts may question scope during examination or legal disputes, requiring robust supporting data and strategic claim drafting to withstand validity challenges.

Q4: How does the regional patent strategy affect global commercialization?
A: Filing in major markets through the PCT pathway allows the applicant to tailor national phase entries based on regional patent laws, market potential, and infringement risks, optimizing global IP protection.

Q5: What are the implications of the patent for future drug development?
A: The patent provides a legal barrier that can incentivize or restrict certain development approaches. It can serve as a foundation for further innovation, licensing, or collaboration, shaping the therapeutic landscape in its targeted disease area.


References

  1. World Intellectual Property Organization. International Patent Application WO2017004393.
  2. Patent landscape reports on therapeutic chemical classes (not specific references, based on general trends).
  3. WIPO Patent Statistics and Analysis Reports.
  4. Industry analysis on patent landscapes in pharmaceutical innovation.

This analysis aims to equip business professionals with a strategic understanding of WO2017004393’s inventive scope, patent positioning, and the landscape context vital for informed decision-making.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.