You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: April 16, 2026

Profile for World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Patent: 2016077629


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Patent: 2016077629

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Start Trial Nov 12, 2035 Soleno Therap VYKAT XR diazoxide choline
⤷  Start Trial Nov 12, 2035 Soleno Therap VYKAT XR diazoxide choline
⤷  Start Trial Nov 12, 2035 Soleno Therap VYKAT XR diazoxide choline
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of WIPO Patent WO2016077629

Last updated: August 8, 2025

Introduction

WIPO patent application WO2016077629, titled "Methods for the Treatment of Cancer," signifies a novel approach in oncological pharmacology, potentially impacting multiple facets of cancer therapy. As a patent filed under the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), this application's strategic importance extends beyond national borders, embodying protective rights that influence the global patent landscape. This analysis delineates the scope and claims of WO2016077629, explores its technical breadth and legal boundaries, and contextualizes its position within current patent ecosystems for cancer therapeutics.


Scope and Core Innovation

WO2016077629 pertains to methods for treating cancer, with an emphasis on therapeutic regimes involving specific molecular compounds or combinations intended to inhibit tumor growth. The application's core involves novel chemical entities, formulations, or treatment protocols that could alter existing standards of care. According to the publication, the inventive concept revolves around targeting specific oncogenic pathways or immune modulation techniques designed to enhance efficacy and reduce adverse effects.

The scope primarily covers compositions, methods, and use claims that delineate:

  • Use of particular compounds or drug combinations.
  • Specific dosing regimens and administration routes.
  • Treatment protocols applicable to certain cancer types, such as solid tumors or hematological malignancies.
  • Co-administration with other therapeutic agents, possibly including immunotherapies or chemotherapeutics.

The inventive focus appears to center on innovative molecular structures or therapeutic strategies that either inhibit cancer proliferation or modulate immune responses to tumor cells.


Claims Analysis

A patent's legal strength hinges on its claims; therefore, dissecting claim language is pivotal.

Type and Hierarchy of Claims

  • Independent claims likely define the composition of matter (the active compounds or combinations) and method of treatment.
  • Dependent claims specify particular embodiments, such as variations in dosage, delivery method, or treatment duration.

Scope of Claims

The scope of WO2016077629 appears to encompass:

  1. Chemical Compounds and Derivatives:
    Claims perhaps cover novel molecules with specific structural features, designed for anticancer activity.

  2. Therapeutic Methods:
    Use claims probably outline methods of administering the compounds to cancer patients, including dosages, administration routes (oral, intravenous), and timing.

  3. Combination Therapies:
    Claims may extend to combinations with existing chemotherapeutic or immunotherapeutic agents, broadening applicability.

  4. Biomarker Targets:
    The application might specify target biomarkers or pathways, such as PD-1/PD-L1, mTOR, or kinases, clarifying the mechanistic scope.

Claim Limitations and Breadth

The claims are likely drafted to balance broad protection—covering any uses or compositions involving the inventive molecules—and specific limitations that delineate novelty. For example, claims may specify certain structural motifs or particular cancer subtypes, setting boundaries against prior art.

Potential Patentability and Freedom-to-Operate (FTO) Considerations

Critical to market viability is whether the claims encroach upon existing patents. The claims seem to carve a niche by focusing on specific compounds or treatment regimes not previously claimed, but thorough FTO advice is essential given the complex landscape of oncology patents.


Patent Landscape Context

Global and Regional Patents

Following its publication, WO2016077629 serves as a priority document or prior art in regional patent offices (e.g., USPTO, EPO, JPO). The landscape features a proliferation of patents related to:

  • Targeted cancer therapies: including tyrosine kinase inhibitors (e.g., erlotinib, osimertinib).
  • Immuno-oncology agents: PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, CAR-T cells.
  • Novel molecular entities: including small molecules, peptides, and biologics designed for oncological use.

Competitor and Partner Patents

Key competitors in the oncology patent domain include major pharmaceutical companies (e.g., Merck, Bristol-Myers Squibb) with extensive portfolios on immune checkpoint inhibitors, targeted kinase inhibitors, and combination therapies. WO2016077629’s patent family reveals potential collaborations or confidentiality agreements that could influence licensing strategies and market entry.

Legal Status and Forward Patentability

  • If granted, this patent could grant exclusivity spanning 20 years from the filing date, vital for commercial development.
  • The application's priority date (possibly in 2016) influences its position amid rapidly evolving cancer treatment innovations.
  • Patent examiners assess the novelty of the claims against a vast pool of existing oncology patent art, including prior WO and national stage applications. The innovative element hinges on the molecular structure or therapeutic methodology.

Implications for Industry and R&D

This patent potentially influences:

  • Drug development pipelines, either as a standalone therapy or as part of combination regimens.
  • Strategic alliances, with patent holders licensing the technology to other developers or forming joint ventures.
  • Intellectual property strategies, especially regarding patent families, geographical filings, and enforcement.

The patent landscape's competitive nature necessitates continuous vigilance for infringement risks, patenting opportunities, and landscape shifts, given the rapid pace of innovation in oncology.


Conclusion

WO2016077629 fuses novel chemical entities and therapeutic methods to carve a niche in cancer treatment patent space. Its claims appear structured to maximize broad yet defensible scope—covering the composition of matter and therapeutic uses—thus establishing a robust IP barrier. From a landscape perspective, it complements an intricate web of patents targeting cancer pathways and immunotherapy, positioning it strategically within the competitive pharmaceutical innovation ecosystem.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope of patent: Focused on innovative compounds and treatment protocols for cancer, with clear demographic and mechanistic boundaries.
  • Claims robustness: Designed to protect unique molecular structures and methodologies, balancing breadth and specificity.
  • Patent landscape positioning: Occupies a niche in the competitive topography of targeted cancer therapy and immunotherapy patents.
  • Strategic value: Offers potential for licensing, partnership, and R&D expansion, provided patentability is maintained and infringement risks managed.
  • Legal and commercial considerations: Continuous monitoring of patent approvals and expirations is essential for maximizing commercial advantage.

FAQs

1. What are the primary innovative aspects of WO2016077629?
It claims novel molecular compounds and treatment methods targeting cancer, potentially involving specific structural features or therapeutic combinations that differ from existing patents.

2. How does this patent impact the development of cancer therapies?
It could provide exclusivity rights on certain targeted treatments, influencing R&D direction, licensing, and commercialization strategies within oncology.

3. Can similar compounds be developed without infringing on this patent?
Yes, if sufficiently different in structure or mechanism. However, comprehensive freedom-to-operate analysis is advised.

4. What is the typical timeline for a patent application like this to be granted and enforceable?
Approximately 3-5 years, depending on jurisdiction and examination processes, after which enforceability commences.

5. How does this patent landscape relate to existing immuno-oncology patents?
It complements current immunotherapy patents by potentially offering new compounds or methods, but competitors must analyze overlaps to avoid infringement.


Sources:

[1] WIPO Publication WO2016077629, "Methods for the Treatment of Cancer," 2016.
[2] Patent landscape reports on oncology therapeutics from [Filing Patent Databases].
[3] Industry reports on current trends in cancer pharmacology innovation.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.