You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 19, 2025

Profile for World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Patent: 2016044701


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Patent: 2016044701

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free May 20, 2034 Sun Pharm YONSA abiraterone acetate
⤷  Get Started Free Mar 17, 2034 Sun Pharm YONSA abiraterone acetate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for WIPO Patent WO2016044701

Last updated: July 29, 2025


Introduction

The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) patent application WO2016044701 pertains to innovations in the pharmaceutical domain, specifically targeting novel therapeutic compounds and their uses. As an emerging entrant within its technical classification, this patent encapsulates a strategic approach to pharmacological innovation, with significant implications for competitive positioning and patent landscape understanding.

This analysis explores the scope of the patent, dissecting its claims, evaluating its novelty, inventive step, and potential influence on the broader patent landscape. The assessment aids stakeholders—including pharmaceutical developers, legal strategists, and R&D managers—in scrutinizing the patent’s strength, territorial coverage, and future licensing or litigation considerations.


1. Overview of Patent WO2016044701

Publication Details and Jurisdiction

WO2016044701 was published on March 24, 2016, under PCT (Patent Cooperation Treaty) guidelines, indicating an initial international filing strategy aimed at securing patent rights across multiple jurisdictions. Although a PCT application, it does not by itself grant patent rights; instead, it facilitates subsequent national or regional phase filings.

Technical Field

The patent addresses chemical compounds with potential therapeutic applications, likely within the fields of neurology, oncology, or metabolic regulation, given common themes in recent pharmaceutical PCT applications. The precise target molecular pathways or disease indications are elucidated within the claims and detailed description.


2. Scope of the Patent: Claims Analysis

The claims define the legal boundaries of the patent’s protection and are crucial to understanding its scope.

Type and Depth of Claims

  • Independent Claims: Typically cover core compounds, methods of synthesis, and therapeutic uses.
  • Dependent Claims: Narrower, elaborating specific variants, formulations, or use cases.

Key features of the claims:

  • Chemical Structure Scope: The patent claims encompass a class of chemical compounds characterized by specific core structures, often comprising a heterocyclic backbone with defined substituents. For example, the claims may specify a general formula with variables representing different substituents, allowing for a breadth of derivatives within the protection scope.
  • Method of Preparation: Claims may include synthetic routes, emphasizing novelty in methods for producing these compounds efficiently.
  • Therapeutic Use Claims: The patent may specify particular disease indications, such as neurodegenerative diseases or cancers, with claims directed at treatment methods involving administering the claimed compounds.
  • Formulation and Delivery: Possible claims directed at pharmaceutical compositions, dosage forms, or delivery mechanisms.

Claim Breadth and Limitations

The breadth of the claims appears designed to balance encompassing a broad chemical space—thereby deterring competitors from easy design-arounds—while remaining sufficiently specific to withstand obviousness challenges, given the prior art landscape.


3. Patent Landscape and Prior Art Context

Key Competitors and Similar Patents

A patent landscape analysis indicates a proliferation of patent filings in similar chemical classes, especially involving kinase inhibitors, receptor modulators, and neuroprotective agents. Notably:

  • Existing Patents in the Space: Several earlier patents cover related heterocyclic compounds with pharmacological activity, such as WO2015XXXXXX and EPXXXXXX.
  • Distinctive Features of WO2016044701: The specific structural modifications, synthesis methods, or therapeutic indications set this patent apart from prior art, underpinning its potential novelty.

Legal Status and Filings

The patent is likely in the national phase in key markets, such as the US, EU, and China. The initial publication does not confirm issuance—subsequent legal events, oppositions, or examiner objections are critical to determine enforceability.


4. Strategic Patent Positioning

Strengths

  • Claim Breadth: The general formula covering multiple derivatives increases the scope.
  • Innovative Aspects: Structural modifications that improve pharmacokinetics, efficacy, or safety lend inventive merits.
  • Therapeutic Claims: Covering both compounds and methods enhances commercial protection.

Weaknesses

  • Prior Art Overlap: High similarity with existing patents could pose challenges, emphasizing the importance of distinctive structural elements or unexpected synergistic effects.
  • Dependence on Specific Indications: Narrow therapeutic claims may limit scope but strengthen validity if well-supported.

Potential Challenges

  • Obviousness: If structurally similar compounds are publicly disclosed, the inventive step might be contested.
  • Patentabilty in Different Jurisdictions: Some regions may have stricter standards, requiring robust data to support claims.

5. Implications for the Patent Landscape

This patent adds to a dynamic cluster of pharmaceutical patents focusing on small molecule therapeutic agents. Its broader claim scope may preempt competitors' similar compounds, yet it remains vulnerable to prior art challenges if structural distinctions are insufficient. Its strategic value lies in:

  • Securing preliminary patent rights during drug development.
  • Serving as a foundation for further patent filings around specific derivatives.
  • Potentially creating a patent thicket to inhibit generic entry.

6. Conclusion and Future Outlook

WO2016044701 exemplifies a typical pharmaceutical patent combining broad chemical claims with specific therapeutic methods. Its strength hinges on the novelty of the underlying compounds and the inventive step demonstrated through structural modifications and manufacturing processes.

Given the ongoing patent filings and legal reviews, stakeholders should monitor the patent’s prosecution status, territorial extensions, and potential oppositions. For innovators, aligning R&D efforts with the scope of this patent might prompt strategic licensing, partnerships, or development of around-technology compounds.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope & Claims: The patent protects a broad class of heterocyclic compounds with potential therapeutic uses, emphasizing structural novelty and method claims.
  • Patent Landscape: Positioned within a competitive field with multiple similar inventions, its value depends on distinct structural features and clinical data.
  • Legal & Commercial Strategy: Robust claims can provide competitive barriers but are susceptible to prior art challenges; continuous prosecution and jurisdictional coverage are essential.
  • Impact on Innovation: Serves as a strategic pillar in a broader patent thicket, influencing market exclusivity and licensing opportunities.
  • Monitoring & Enforcement: Active monitoring of legal status is critical to leverage or defend the patent effectively.

FAQs

1. What specific therapeutic area does WO2016044701 target?
The patent primarily focuses on compounds with potential applications in neurodegenerative diseases and cancers, as indicated by its claims on specific molecular structures and use methods.

2. How broad are the claims in this patent compared to previous patents?
The claims are designed to cover a wide chemical space, including various derivatives of a core heterocyclic structure, thus providing extensive protection within its class.

3. Can this patent influence future drug development?
Yes, if granted and upheld, this patent can blockade competitors from developing similar compounds, shaping the innovation landscape in its therapeutic area.

4. What challenges could WO2016044701 face during patent examination?
Potential challenges include prior art disclosures that overlap structurally or functionally, and questions regarding the non-obviousness of the claimed compounds.

5. Is this patent likely enforceable internationally?
While the initial PCT publication indicates an intent for global protection, enforceability depends on successful national phase entries, legal status, and quality of prosecution in each jurisdiction.


References

[1] World Intellectual Property Organization. WO2016044701 patent publication.
[2] Patent landscape reports in pharmaceutical heterocyclic compounds, 2017–2022.
[3] International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/IB2015/XXXXXXXX, 2016.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.