You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Profile for World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Patent: 2015181739


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Patent: 2015181739

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
12,357,630 Dec 13, 2037 Novartis ZYKADIA ceritinib
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of WIPO Patent WO2015181739: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: November 19, 2025


Introduction

The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) patent WO2015181739, titled "Method of treating or preventing neurodegenerative disorders with small molecule compounds," exemplifies recent global efforts to innovate in neurodegenerative disease therapeutics. This patent, filed under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT), reflects strategic research aimed at broad-spectrum treatments by targeting molecular pathways implicated in disorders such as Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, and other dementias. Its scope, claims, and position within the patent landscape have significant implications for stakeholders aiming to develop or commercialize neurodegenerative therapeutics.


Scope of Patent WO2015181739

The patent's scope largely encompasses the composition of matter, methods of treatment, and methods of synthesis relating to small molecule compounds designed for neuroprotection and cognitive restoration. Notably, its claims extend to:

  • Novel chemical entities characterized by specific structural motifs.
  • Use of such compounds for preventing or treating neurodegenerative disorders.
  • Pharmaceutical compositions containing these compounds.
  • Methods of administering effective doses as part of treatment regimens.
  • Diagnostic applications relating to biomarkers associated with neurodegeneration.

Crucially, the scope emphasizes broad applicability across multiple neurological conditions, leveraging molecular mechanisms such as modulation of oxidative stress, inflammation, and protein aggregation.


Claims Analysis

a) Composition of Matter Claims

The patent includes extensive claims covering specific classes of small molecules — particularly derivatives featuring heteroaromatic rings, flexible linkers, and functional groups conducive to blood-brain barrier penetration. These compounds are claimed to exert neuroprotective effects via modulation of target proteins or pathways involved in neurodegeneration.

For instance, claims specify subclasses of compounds with particular substitutions that enhance bioavailability and target affinity. These chemical structures aim to address prior limitations of CNS drugs, such as poor permeability and off-target effects.

b) Method of Treatment Claims

The patent describes methods for preventing, ameliorating, or halting neurodegeneration by administering therapeutically effective amounts of the claimed compounds. These claims extend to:

  • Dose regimes and treatment duration.
  • Use in subjects at various disease stages.
  • Combination therapies with existing pharmaceuticals (e.g., cholinesterase inhibitors).

The claims are broad, covering both prophylactic and therapeutic applications, emphasizing the compounds' versatility.

c) Diagnostic and Biomarker Claims

Although primarily pharmaceutical, the patent encompasses diagnostic methods that utilize the compounds in detecting disease-related biomarkers, such as abnormal protein deposits, indicating a comprehensive approach to neurodegeneration management.

d) Synthesis and Formulation Claims

Claims extend to synthetic routes enabling efficient manufacture, emphasizing scalability for commercial production. Formulation claims specify delivery methods (oral, parenteral) optimized for CNS targeting.


Patent Landscape Context

1. Similar Patents and Prior Art

The patent landscape surrounding neurodegenerative disease treatment is crowded, with notable patents from big pharma (e.g., Novartis, Lilly, Biogen). Many prior patents focus on mono-targeted molecules, such as beta-amyloid inhibitors, tau aggregation blockers, or neuroinflammation modulators.

Unlike earlier patents, WO2015181739 claims multi-functional compounds that synergize multiple pathways, presenting a novelty advantage. Its broad structural claims aim to carve a niche within a crowded space dominated by narrow, target-specific patents.

2. Patent Family and Priority Filings

The WO2015181739 application, filed in 2014, claims priority from filings in the U.S. and Europe. The patent family covers regional jurisdictions where neurodegenerative drug patenting is active, such as the U.S., EPO member states, and Japan, ensuring global protection and freedom to operate.

3. Competitive Position

This patent positions itself as a platform patent due to its broad claims on chemical classes and use methods. Its strength lies in the potential to block competitors developing structurally similar compounds targeting the same pathways, especially if subsequent filings provide narrow follow-up claims.

However, patentability hinges on demonstrating novelty and inventive step over existing neuroprotective compounds, such as those emerging from the field of multi-target-directed ligands (MTDLs).

4. Potential Challenges

The primary challenge involves prior art related to similar heterocyclic compounds with neuroprotective activity. The patent's breadth may be contested unless characterized by specific structural features or unexpected results. Moreover, the complex patent landscape in neurodegeneration indicates the need for continual patent surveilling to avoid infringement.


Implications for Stakeholders

For R&D Companies

  • Innovation Scope: The patent’s broad claims on compound classes offer an expansive platform for developing next-generation neuroprotectants.

  • Design Around: Companies must scrutinize prior art to design non-infringing compounds, emphasizing novel structural modifications or alternative mechanisms.

For Legal and Patent Strategists

  • Liability and Enforcement: The broad claims necessitate careful drafting and enforcement strategies to defend patent integrity and prevent infringing activities.

  • Strategic Filing: To extend protection, filing divisional or continuation applications focusing on narrower, optimized compounds is advisable.

For Investors and Commercial Partners

  • Licensing Opportunities: The patent’s scope creates potential licensing agreements, especially for promising compounds entering clinical development, given the unmet need in neurodegeneration.

  • Risk Management: Recognize existing patents that could threaten freedom-to-operate, necessitating due diligence before investment.


Key Takeaways

  • Broad Scope & Multi-Functional Approach: WO2015181739 differs from prior neurodegenerative patents by covering a diverse class of small molecules, combined with methods of use, making it a significant asset for drug development strategies.

  • Strategic Positioning in Patent Landscape: Its claims aim to secure dominance in the multi-target neuroprotective space, potentially blocking competitors and serving as foundational intellectual property.

  • Legal Robustness & Challenges: The patent’s strength depends on maintaining novelty and non-obviousness amid an extensive prior art landscape. Drafting, prosecution history, and subsequent filings will influence enforceability.

  • Commercial Implication: Securing rights to these compounds could accelerate development pipelines for neurodegenerative therapies, filling a substantial unmet medical need with high market potential.

  • Future Development: Continued innovation and precise claim drafting will be key to sustain patent strength, especially as the neurodegeneration field evolves with combination therapies and biomarker-guided treatments.


FAQs

  1. What makes WO2015181739 different from existing neurodegenerative patents?
    It claims a broad class of multi-functional small molecules targeting multiple pathways, unlike existing patents focusing on single-target agents.

  2. Can competitors develop similar compounds without infringement?
    Yes, if they design structural variants outside the scope of the claims or target different mechanisms, but careful freedom-to-operate analysis is essential.

  3. Is the patent applicable beyond the original jurisdiction?
    The patent family’s filings in the U.S. and Europe suggest potential for territorial rights there; global coverage depends on regional patent grants and maintenance.

  4. What are the key challenges in enforcing this patent?
    Demonstrating that a competitor’s compound falls within the scope of claims, especially given the broad language, and overcoming prior art rejections.

  5. How should innovators utilize this patent?
    By leveraging its broad claims to develop novel compounds, or by designing around its structural scope to create non-infringing alternatives.


References

[1] World Intellectual Property Organization. (2015). WIPO Patent Application WO2015181739. "Method of treating or preventing neurodegenerative disorders with small molecule compounds."

[2] Patent landscape reports on neurodegeneration treatment patents from recent years, including filings by leading pharmaceutical companies.

[3] Prior art and patent review articles on multi-target-directed ligands in neurodegenerative diseases.


This analysis provides a comprehensive understanding of the scope, claims, and patent landscape surrounding WO2015181739, equipping stakeholders with strategic insights to make informed business and legal decisions.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.