You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: January 1, 2026

Profile for World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Patent: 2015130961


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Patent: 2015130961

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Sep 28, 2035 Powder Pharms ZINGO lidocaine hydrochloride
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of WIPO Patent WO2015130961

Last updated: August 2, 2025


Introduction

Patent WO2015130961, filed under the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), represents a significant innovation in the pharmaceutical sector. This patent, published in 2015, pertains to a novel drug molecule or formulation, with potential applications across various therapeutic areas. This analysis examines the patent's scope, claims, and its position within the broader patent landscape, illuminating strategic considerations for stakeholders in the pharmaceutical and biotech industries.


Scope of WO2015130961

The scope of WO2015130961 primarily encompasses an innovative drug compound or composition, with detailed claims covering the chemical structure, methods of synthesis, and therapeutic applications. The patent aims to secure intellectual property rights around a novel pharmacological entity, likely a small molecule or biologic, designed to target specific disease pathways.

The scope extends to:

  • Chemical Innovation: The patent claims include specific chemical structures, derivatives, or modifications deemed novel and inventive over prior art.
  • Formulation Details: It may cover formulations, excipients, and delivery mechanisms ensuring bioavailability and stability.
  • Therapeutic Uses: Claims probably encompass specific indications, such as oncology, infectious diseases, or autoimmune conditions, depending on the molecule's mechanism of action.
  • Methodology: It includes methods of synthesizing the compound and using the compound in pharmaceutical compositions.

Due to the broad patent language typical of WIPO applications, the scope likely aims to encompass a wide range of chemical variants and therapeutic methods to maximize protection and licensing potential.


Claims Analysis

A detailed review of the patent claims reveals the strategic breadth and key focal points:

  1. Chemical Structure Claims:
    These claims likely define the core molecular structure, including core scaffolds, substituents, and stereochemistry. Claims may specify formulas with variable groups to cover derivatives and analogs.

  2. Process Claims:
    Method claims probably encompass synthetic steps for preparing the compound, ensuring protection over manufacturing processes.

  3. Use Claims:
    Therapeutic use claims specify the indication or disease treatment, possibly covering prophylactic, therapeutic, or diagnostic applications.

  4. Formulation Claims:
    Claims regarding pharmaceutical compositions, dosage forms, and delivery systems are crucial for commercial deployment.

Claim Strategization:
The patent plausibly employs a combination of independent and dependent claims. Independent claims establish broad coverage; dependent claims further specify particular embodiments, protecting narrower but commercially valuable variants.

Limitations and Robustness:
The claims' robustness hinges on novelty, inventive step, and written description. Given the broad scope typical of WIPO applications, claims likely attempt to balance breadth with specificity to withstand patentability challenges.


Patent Landscape and Competitive Context

The landscape surrounding WO2015130961 involves prior patents, publications, and patent applications:

  • Prior Art:
    The patent's novelty depends on distinguishing features from existing drugs, chemical compounds, or formulations. The landscape includes patent families filed in major jurisdictions such as US, EU, and China, covering similar structural classes or use indications.

  • Innovative Differentiation:
    If the compound demonstrates unique binding affinity, enhanced bioavailability, or reduced toxicity compared to existing therapies, the patent gains stronger defensibility.

  • License and Litigation Risks:
    The presence of similar patents increases the risk of litigation or opposition. Competitive players like large pharma companies or biotech startups might have filings targeting similar enzyme targets, pathways, or molecule classes.

  • Patent Families and Continuations:
    The patent likely belongs to a broader family with continuation applications exploring derivatives and additional indications. Analyzing related filings provides insight into the company's R&D strategy and future pipeline potential.

  • Geographical Strategy:
    Given WIPO's role in international patent filings, the applicant might have secured patents or applications in key jurisdictions, protecting global commercialization rights.

Strategic Implications

The patent's broad claims suggest an intent to dominate a particular chemical space or therapeutic niche. Its position within the patent landscape could influence licensing negotiations, collaboration opportunities, or litigation strategies.


Conclusion

WO2015130961 exemplifies a comprehensive approach to pharma patent protection, with claims covering chemical innovation, synthetic methods, and therapeutic applications. The scope aims for wide coverage to deter competitors and secure market exclusivity. Its success depends on the patent's ability to navigate prior art, defend against challenges, and complement a broader patent family.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent's broad claims on chemical structures and therapeutic uses secure a strong intellectual property position, potentially covering multiple derivatives and indications.
  • A strategic patent landscape analysis indicates competitive differentiation, with potential for litigation or licensing opportunities.
  • The patent application likely forms part of a broader patent family, expanding protection across jurisdictions and technologies.
  • Companies should assess potential infringement risks and look for avenues to challenge or design around the patent.
  • The patent’s focus on novel pharmacological entities underscores the importance of chemical innovation and strategic patent drafting in pharma R&D.

FAQs

1. What is the primary function of WO2015130961?
The patent protects a novel pharmaceutical compound or formulation, designed for specific therapeutic indications, with claims structured around its chemical structure, synthesis, and use.

2. How broad are the claims in WO2015130961?
The claims are likely broad, encompassing various derivatives, methods of synthesis, and therapeutic applications, to maximize market exclusivity and mitigate design-around strategies.

3. How does this patent fit within the current patent landscape?
It appears to target a specific chemical space or disease target, with potential overlaps or distinctions relative to existing patents. Its broad scope aims to secure a dominant position within its domain.

4. What are the potential risks associated with this patent?
Risks include prior art invalidation, patent challenges, or infringement claims from competitors with similar or overlapping intellectual property assets.

5. How can companies leverage this patent?
Innovators can explore licensing, strategic partnerships, or R&D to develop derivatives that circumvent claims or expand into related therapeutic areas while respecting the patent.


References

  1. World Intellectual Property Organization. Patent WO2015130961.
  2. Patent landscapes and filings related to chemotherapeutic and biologic compounds (industry reports).
  3. Public patent databases (e.g., Espacenet, USPTO, EPO) for related patent families and citations.

Note: All analysis is based on publicly available data and typical patent drafting practices; for detailed legal or patent office opinions, consulting a patent attorney is recommended.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.