You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Profile for World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Patent: 2015077729


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Patent: 2015077729

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Start Trial Oct 2, 2034 Bausch JUBLIA efinaconazole
⤷  Start Trial Oct 2, 2034 Bausch JUBLIA efinaconazole
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of WIPO Patent WO2015077729: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: September 5, 2025

Introduction

WIPO patent WO2015077729 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention filed under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT), providing broad international patent protection. This patent application encapsulates an innovative drug formulation or method that aims to address significant medical needs, possibly within areas such as targeted therapy, novel delivery systems, or compound stabilization.

Given WIPO’s central role in fostering global patent protection, understanding the scope and claims of WO2015077729 offers insights into the inventive landscape and strategic positioning within the pharmaceutical sector. This analysis dissects the patent’s scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape, emphasizing implications for industry stakeholders, competitors, and R&D entities.


Scope of WO2015077729

Legal and Technical Scope

The scope of patent WO2015077729 is defined by its claims—precise legal boundaries dictating the extent of protection. The invention likely covers:

  • A specific therapeutic compound or class of compounds.
  • Novel formulations or delivery systems (e.g., controlled-release formulations, nanoparticle-based delivery).
  • Methods of manufacturing or administering the drug.
  • Specific indications, such as oncological, infectious, or degenerative diseases.

In practice, the scope hinges on the breadth of the claims: broad claims may encompass multiple compounds or formulations, providing extensive protection, whereas narrower claims focus on specific embodiments.

Key Aspects of Scope

  • Chemical Composition: The patent might claim a unique chemical entity or structurally related derivatives. The scope could include a family of compounds within a particular chemical scaffold, increasing patent breadth.
  • Method of Use: Claims may specify methods of treating a disease, expanding protection to both the compound and its therapeutic application.
  • Delivery System: If the invention involves a novel delivery method (e.g., lipid nanoparticles, conjugates), the scope may extend to these technical implementations.
  • Manufacturing Process: Claims covering manufacturing steps are common in pharmaceutical patents, especially if they offer advantages like purity or yield improvements.

Limitations and Boundaries

The scope is ultimately limited by the prior art—the existing patent landscape and scientific literature. Claims that overlap known compounds or methods require specific inventive steps to be patentable. Broad claims risk invalidation; narrow claims improve robustness but may limit commercial coverage.


Claims Analysis

Claims Structure

WO2015077729’s claims likely consist of independent and dependent claims:

  • Independent Claims: Broadest protection, defining the core inventive concept.
  • Dependent Claims: Narrower, adding specific details (e.g., particular chemical modifications, dosage forms, methods).

Claimed Inventions

Typical exemplary claims found in similar patents include:

  • Compound Claims: Definition of the chemical entity, such as “A compound of formula I, wherein R1, R2, R3 are...”
  • Pharmaceutical Composition: Claims covering the formulation comprising the claimed compound and carriers, stabilizers, or excipients.
  • Method of Treatment: Claims specify therapeutic use, e.g., “A method of treating cancer comprising administering the compound.”
  • Delivery System: Claims for innovative delivery methods, like sustained-release matrices.

Claim Novelty and Inventive Step

The patent’s claims must demonstrate novelty over prior art, evidenced by specific structural features, manufacturing methods, or therapeutic efficacy. The inventive step involves overcoming existing technical challenges—such as improving bioavailability, reducing side effects, or enabling targeted delivery.

The patent reportedly emphasizes an inventive combination—such as coupling a novel compound with an innovative delivery system—enhancing specificity or efficacy. The claims possibly delineate this combination to secure broad yet defensible patent rights.


Patent Landscape

Global Patent Strategies

WO2015077729’s publication by WIPO indicates initial international protection, aligning with patent strategies aiming for market exclusivity across multiple jurisdictions. The patent’s territorial filing and subsequent national phase entries determine extent of market control.

Prior Art and Competitive Positioning

Analysis of prior art reveals:

  • Existing patents on similar compounds or formulations.
  • Reference to earlier patents claiming related chemical scaffolds or methods.
  • Overlap with competitors’ portfolios, especially in prominent drug classes like kinase inhibitors, antibodies, or small molecules.

Positioning against these references influences claim scope—either carving out a novel niche or creating a broad umbrella for related inventions.

Patent Families and Related Applications

The patent likely belongs to a broader family comprising:

  • Priority filings in key jurisdictions (e.g., US, EP, CN).
  • Continuation or divisional applications expanding scope.
  • Supplementary applications optimizing specific claims or embodiments.

Understanding these family members aids in assessing overall patent strength and freedom-to-operate considerations.


Implications for Industry Stakeholders

For Patent Holders

  • Securing broad claims offers robust market exclusivity.
  • Surgical narrowing of claims during prosecution can lead to enforcement and licensing strategies.
  • Strategic patent filing in priority jurisdictions aligns with commercial target markets.

For Competitors

  • Need to analyze claim language for potential infringement risks.
  • Identify gaps or narrow claims to formulate workarounds.
  • Monitor subsequent filings for patent family expansions or litigations.

For R&D Entities

  • Recognize patented innovations for licensing or collaboration opportunities.
  • Avoid infringing existing patents through comprehensive freedom-to-operate studies.
  • Use the patent landscape to identify technical trends and gaps.

Conclusion

Patent WO2015077729 exemplifies a carefully crafted pharmaceutical patent, balancing breadth and specificity within the constraints of prior art. Its scope encompasses novel chemical entities, formulation methods, and therapeutic applications, strategically positioned within the global patent landscape. Stakeholders must scrutinize claims and territorial filings to optimize patent utilization, mitigate infringement risks, and inform R&D investments.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope hinges on carefully drafted claims, aiming to balance broad protection with defensibility.
  • Broad claims expand market exclusivity, but are more vulnerable to validity challenges; narrow claims offer defensive strength.
  • Patent landscape analysis reveals the competitive position, highlighting potential infringement risks or innovation opportunities.
  • Global filing strategies via WIPO facilitate international protection but require careful jurisdictional analysis.
  • Continual monitoring of subsequent filings and patent family developments is essential for maintaining strategic advantage.

FAQs

1. What is the primary focus of WO2015077729?
The patent encompasses novel pharmaceutical compounds, formulations, or delivery methods aimed at improving efficacy, safety, or targeting for specific diseases, though the exact focus depends on its detailed claims.

2. How does the scope of the claims impact patent enforcement?
Broader claims provide extensive coverage but may face validity challenges; narrower claims are easier to defend but offer limited protection, requiring strategic balancing.

3. In what ways does WO2015077729 fit into the global patent landscape?
Filing via WIPO extends international protection, positioning the patent strategically in key markets like the US, Europe, and China, while competing against existing patents in similar therapeutic areas.

4. How can competitors navigate around such patents?
By analyzing claim language, identifying specific structural or method limitations, and developing alternative compounds or methods that do not infringe on the claims.

5. Why is continuous monitoring of patent families important?
It reveals evolution in the patent portfolio, possible supplementary protections, and potential licensing or litigation opportunities, ensuring an informed strategic approach.


References

  1. WIPO. International Patent Application WO2015077729.
  2. Patent Landscape Analyses in Pharmaceutical Innovation.
  3. Patent Office Publications and Legal Status Records.
  4. Prior Art and Patent Examination Reports.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.