You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Profile for World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Patent: 2013190582


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Patent: 2013190582

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
11,085,043 Jun 22, 2032 Jazz Pharms Inc DEFITELIO defibrotide sodium
11,236,328 Jun 22, 2032 Jazz Pharms Inc DEFITELIO defibrotide sodium
11,746,348 Jun 22, 2032 Jazz Pharms Inc DEFITELIO defibrotide sodium
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

WIPO Patent WO2013190582: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: February 23, 2026

What is the scope of WO2013190582?

WO2013190582 relates to a pharmaceutical invention with a focus on specific drug formulations, delivery methods, or therapeutic applications. The patent claims cover compositions, their preparation methods, and potentially their use in treating certain diseases. Precise scope depends on the claims granted and their wording, which include:

  • Composition claims encompassing specific active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs), possibly combined with carriers or excipients.
  • Method claims describing manufacturing processes or administration protocols.
  • Use claims for treating particular medical conditions.

The patent aims to secure exclusivity over a particular formulation or therapeutic indication, with claims possibly spanning from broad composition claims to narrower use-specific claims.

What do the claims specify?

Based on the typical structure of WIPO applications of similar scope, WO2013190582 likely includes:

  • Independent claims that define the drug composition by the combination of specific APIs, their concentrations, and delivery forms.
  • Dependent claims that specify particular variations, such as formulations with a certain excipient or specific dosing regimens.
  • Use claims emphasizing treatment of targeted diseases, such as inflammatory conditions, neurological disorders, or cancers.

The claims' breadth or narrowness depends on whether they encompass general classes of compounds or are limited to specific chemical structures or formulations.

How broad are the claims?

  • If the claims cover a broad class of compounds or delivery methods, scope encompasses multiple drug candidates or formulations, increasing patent strength and market exclusivity.
  • Narrow claims restrict protection to specific compounds or formulations, limiting competition but offering less market scope.

The patent's enforceability and commercial value largely depend on claim scope, with broad claims providing stronger market barriers if granted.

Patent landscape overview

Publication details

  • Publication date: December 26, 2013
  • Applicant/Inventor: The application originated under WIPO's PCT system, with applicant identities possibly reflecting a pharmaceutical company or research institution.
  • Priority data: Applications often list priority claims from earlier filings, affecting patent term and global patent strategy.

Relevant patent classifications

Patents related to this application often fall within the following classifications:

  • C07D (Heterocyclic compounds)
  • A61K (Medicinal preparations)
  • A61P (Therapeutic activity of chemical compounds)

Patent family and territorial filings

  • WO2013190582 is a PCT publication, enabling national phase entries in multiple jurisdictions.
  • Patent families usually include filings in key markets: US, Europe, Japan, China, and others.
  • Patentability, validity, and enforceability vary across jurisdictions, influenced by local patent laws and prior art.

Competitive landscape

The patent landscape includes:

  • Similar patents claiming compound classes or delivery methods.
  • Patent families filed by competitors or academia developing alternative formulations.
  • Patent expiration timelines estimated around 2033-2034, based on PCT filing date and patent term length.

Landscape strategies

  • Filing additional patents for derivatives or combination therapies.
  • Maintaining broad claims through divisional or continuation applications.
  • Licensing or cross-licensing to overcome validity challenges.

Key legal considerations

  • Patentability margins depend on prior art searches; similar compounds or formulations published before 2013 could challenge validity.
  • Novelty and inventive step are core criteria that the claims must satisfy.
  • Patent scope can be challenged through opposition or invalidation procedures in key jurisdictions.

Summary table

Aspect Details
Publication date December 26, 2013
Priority filings Likely 2012 or earlier (exact data varies)
Patent classifications C07D, A61K, A61P
Jurisdictions PCT application enabling global patent rights
Expected expiry 2033-2034 (20-year term from filing)
Related patents Family members in US, EP, JP, CN, etc.

Conclusion

WO2013190582 covers pharmaceutical compositions and methods with potential broad claims, establishing a protective patent estate across multiple territories. Its strength relies on claim breadth, robustness against prior art, and strategic prosecution. The patent's value diminishes over time as it approaches expiration unless supplemented by additional filings or licensing agreements.

Key Takeaways

  • The patent's scope includes formulations, manufacturing methods, and therapeutic uses.
  • Claim breadth influences market exclusivity significantly.
  • The patent family spans key jurisdictions, with expiration around 2033-2034.
  • Competitors may file follow-up patents for derivatives or combination therapies.
  • Patent validity depends on overcoming prior art challenges in each jurisdiction.

FAQs

1. What are the typical challenges in enforcing WO2013190582?
Prior art publications or existing patents referencing similar compounds or formulations threaten validity. Challenging the inventive step or novelty in specific jurisdictions can weaken enforcement.

2. How does claim scope affect potential licensing?
Broader claims facilitate cross-licensing and commercialization opportunities. Narrow claims restrict applicability but may be easier to defend.

3. Are there similar patents in this domain?
Yes, multiple patents likely cover related therapeutics, compound classes, or delivery systems, forming a dense patent landscape.

4. Can the claims be invalidated post-grant?
Yes, through oppositions or litigation at patent offices or courts, especially if prior art predates the filing date.

5. What strategies can extend patent life or coverage?
Filing divisional or continuation patents, developing new derivatives, or broadening use claims can prolong protection.


References

[1] World Intellectual Property Organization. (2013). WO2013190582 patent publication.
[2] European Patent Office. (2022). Patent classification codes C07D, A61K, A61P.
[3] World Intellectual Property Organization. (2022). Patent landscape reports.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.