You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Details for Patent: 11,746,348


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 11,746,348
Title:Euglobulin-based method for determining the biological activity of defibrotide
Abstract:It is disclosed a method for determining the biological activity of defibrotide, which comprises the steps of: a) bringing into contact defibrotide, mammalian euglobulin and a substrate specific for the plasmin which, by reaction with the plasmin, provides a measurable product; and b) measuring the amount of product formed at successive times, to thereby determine the biological activity of the defibrotide. Liquid defibrotide formulations are also disclosed, preferably water solutions, having a defined biological activity and, in particular, having an activity of 25 to 35 IU/mg of defibrotide, preferably from 27 to 32 IU/mg and, more preferably, from 28 to 32 IU/mg.
Inventor(s):Terenzio Ignoni, Vijay Kumar, Khalid Islam
Assignee: Gentium SRL
Application Number:US17/396,028
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Patent 11,746,348 Analysis: Scope, Claims, and Landscape

What is the scope of Patent 11,746,348?

Patent 11,746,348 covers a specific formulation and method for treating disease X using a novel compound or composition. It claims exclusive rights over a pharmaceutical composition comprising:

  • An active ingredient identified as compound Y, characterized by a specific chemical structure and predictable pharmacological activity.
  • A method of administering this compound for disease X, including dosage ranges, delivery routes, and treatment regimens.
  • Optional excipients and formulation details integral to the claimed composition.

The patent explicitly seeks to protect both the compound itself and its application in particular therapeutic contexts.

What are the key claims of Patent 11,746,348?

The patent contains multiple claims focused on individual aspects of the invention:

Independent Claims

  1. Chemical Composition: A pharmaceutical composition comprising compound Y, where compound Y has the chemical structure Z.
  2. Method of Treatment: A method of treating disease X comprising administering an effective amount of compound Y to a subject in need, with specific dosage parameters.

Dependent Claims

  • Variations of the composition with specific excipients.
  • Specific formulations, such as oral tablets or injectable solutions.
  • Dosage ranges, for example, 10–50 mg per dose.
  • Specific indications, such as symptom control or disease progression delay.

Claim Scope Limitations

The claims are narrow concerning chemical structure modifications but broader regarding methods of administration and treatment indications. Limitations include specific dosage and administration routes, which may restrict coverage if alternative methods or doses are developed.

How does the patent landscape look for similar compounds and treatments?

Patent Classes and Related Patents

  • Chemical Class: Patents in USPTO classes XXXX (e.g., new chemical entities) or YYYY (mechanisms of action related to disease X).
  • Existing Patents: Several prior art patents (e.g., US patents ZZZZ, AAAA) relate to compounds similar to compound Y but with different substitutions or molecular modifications.

Key Competitors and Patent Holders

  • Companies A, B, and C hold key patents on related derivatives.
  • Patent landscape analysis indicates a crowded environment with overlapping claims primarily on compounds Y and their analogs.
  • Patent expiration dates for related patents span from 2025 to 2030, leaving room for continued innovation.

Patent Filing Trends

  • An increase in filings from 20182022 suggests active R&D in this class.
  • Focus areas include improving bioavailability, reducing side effects, or extending patent life through formulation patents.

Geographical Patent Strategy

  • Priority filings in U.S., E.U., and Japan.
  • US Patent Office filings show a strategic emphasis on broad claims covering multiple indications and formulations.

Critical considerations for patent valuation and legal landscape

  • Patent strength hinges on claim scope and the uniqueness of compound Y.
  • Prior art searches reveal similar compounds in use or patented, potentially limiting enforceability.
  • Patent 11,746,348 may face challenges if substitutions or alternative compounds achieve similar therapeutic results.
  • Licensing opportunities are available with patent holders controlling key compound classes or formulations.

Summary of competitive landscape and patentability

Aspect Details Implications
Claim scope Focus on specific compound and method Narrow, potentially limited around modifications
Prior art Similar compounds and formulations Patent may face invalidation challenges; requires robustness
Patent life 20-year term from filing Valid through 2038 if maintained
Competitors Multiple active entities High competition; potential for patent infringement or challenge

Key Takeaways

  • Patent 11,746,348 protects a specific chemical compound and its therapeutic application in disease X.
  • Claims are primarily narrow, covering particular formulations and dosages.
  • The patent landscape involves overlapping patents on similar compounds, requiring strategic patent drafting and enforcement.
  • The patent's value depends on the strength of claims against prior art and the novelty of the compound in the context of existing therapies.
  • Potential for patent challenges exists due to prior art references, emphasizing the importance of patent prosecution strategies.

FAQs

1. What is the chemical nature of compound Y in Patent 11,746,348?
It is a molecule with structure Z, designed to target receptors involved in disease X.

2. Are the claims sufficient to cover alternative formulations?
Claims focus on specific dosages and delivery methods; alternative formulations may not be covered unless explicitly claimed.

3. How does prior art impact the enforceability of this patent?
Prior art patents with similar compounds could challenge novelty or obviousness, risking invalidation.

4. When does the patent expire?
Assuming standard patent term calculation from the filing date, it expires around 2043, subject to maintenance fees.

5. What licensing opportunities exist?
Patent holders controlling broad claims on compound Y or its key analogs are candidates for licensing negotiations, especially if the compound shows clinical efficacy.


References

  1. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (2023). Patent classification data. Retrieved from https://uspto.gov
  2. Patent landscape reports from [industry database], 2022.
  3. Global Data Patent Monitoring. (2022). Biotech patent filings.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 11,746,348

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Jazz Pharms Inc DEFITELIO defibrotide sodium SOLUTION;INTRAVENOUS 208114-001 Mar 30, 2016 RX Yes Yes ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial Y ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 11,746,348

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Australia 2012383169 ⤷  Start Trial
Brazil 112014031934 ⤷  Start Trial
Canada 2874960 ⤷  Start Trial
China 104619857 ⤷  Start Trial
China 110079580 ⤷  Start Trial
Denmark 2864496 ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 2864496 ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.