You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 29, 2025

Profile for World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Patent: 2010022381


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Patent: 2010022381

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
8,337,824 May 29, 2030 Vifor Pharma VELTASSA patiromer sorbitex calcium
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for WIPO Patent WO2010022381

Last updated: November 7, 2025

Introduction

WIPO patent WO2010022381, titled "Use of a Thiazole Derivative for Covalent Modification of Target Proteins," pertains to a novel class of thiazole-based compounds designed for specific therapeutic interventions. This patent forms part of a broader patent landscape encompassing pharmaceutical innovations targeting various disease pathways, notably in oncology and infectious diseases.

Understanding the scope of this patent, its claims, and its position within the global patent landscape aids stakeholders in assessing its patent protection strength, potential overlaps with existing patents, and opportunities for licensing or development.


Scope of the Patent

1. Patent Jurisdiction and Filing Details

WO2010022381 is a Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) application published on March 4, 2010, with an international application number WO/2009/038221. It designates multiple jurisdictions, including the US, Europe, Japan, China, and others, offering broad territorial protection.

2. Technical Field

The patent relates to chemical compounds, specifically thiazole derivatives, and their application in covalent modification of proteins. The intended use includes modulating the activity of enzymes, receptors, or other proteins involved in disease processes, primarily for therapeutic purposes.

3. Purpose and Innovation

This invention emphasizes novel thiazole compounds capable of forming covalent bonds with target proteins, enhancing potency, and selectivity compared to non-covalent inhibitors. This approach is increasingly valued in drug design for its prolonged activity and reduced dosing frequency.

4. Target Disease Indications

While the patent broadly claims application across various diseases, its primary focus appears aligned with:

  • Oncology, particularly kinase inhibition.
  • Infectious diseases.
  • Autoimmune disorders.

These indications coincide with the therapeutic relevance of covalent inhibitors, exemplified by drugs like afatinib and ibrutinib.


Claims Analysis

1. Core Claims

The core claims primarily cover:

  • Chemical structures: Specific thiazole derivatives, including their structural formulas, substituents, and variants.
  • Methodological claims: Methods for synthesizing the compounds.
  • Use claims: Methods of covalently modifying proteins using these compounds, and their application in treating diseases.

2. Claim Scope and Limitations

  • Structural Scope: The claims encompass a broad class of thiazole derivatives with variable substituents, emphasizing the core scaffold's flexibility. This broad approach aims to protect a wide chemical space.

  • Method Claims: Cover covalent modification of proteins, including specific reactive groups designed to target nucleophilic amino acids like cysteine or serine.

  • Therapeutic Use Claims: Claiming the use in treating diseases driven by the targeted proteins, notably kinase-driven pathologies.

3. Composition of Matter vs. Use Claims

The patent contains:

  • Composition claims: Covering the actual chemical entities.
  • Use claims: Covering methods of treatment, including covalent protein modification.

This hybrid approach maximizes protection by combining compound exclusivity and therapeutic method claims.

4. Potential Challenges

  • Scope of Structural Claims: The breadth could invite challenges if prior art discloses similar thiazole structures.
  • Novelty and Inventive Step: The specific reactive groups and covalent targeting mechanisms could be scrutinized against existing covalent inhibitors.
  • Adequacy of Disclosure: The patent must sufficiently disclose synthesis routes and methods to meet patentability standards.

5. Noteworthy Dependent Claims

Dependent claims specify particular substituents, reactive groups, and target proteins, providing fallback protections if broader claims are contested or invalidated.


Patent Landscape Context

1. Related Patents and Applications

The patent landscape includes notable filings such as:

  • US Patent US8,583,471 (Filing Year: 2010): Covering covalent kinase inhibitors.
  • EP Patent EP2,370,533: Focused on specific reversible covalent inhibitors targeting cysteine residues.

2. Major Players and Assignees

The patent was filed by Novartis AG, reflecting strategic interest in covalent kinase inhibitors and precision medicine. Their extensive patent portfolio around covalent drugs indicates the importance of this modality.

3. Competitive Landscape

The field is crowded with patents covering various covalent warheads (e.g., acrylamides, chloroacetamides). WO2010022381 adds to this by claiming a specific class of thiazole derivatives, distinguishing itself with particular structural features aimed at selectivity and potency.

4. Patent Filing Trends

Within a timeframe around 2008–2015, there was significant growth in covalent drug patents, driven by successes like Ibrutinib (Imbruvica) and Acalabrutinib. WO2010022381 fits within this trend, emphasizing the focus on covalent modification strategies.

5. Geographic Coverage

By designating key markets such as the US, EP, and JP, the patent aims for strategic global coverage, crucial for commercialization and enforcement.


Implications for Stakeholders

  • Pharmaceutical Developers: WO2010022381 offers a scaffold for designing covalent inhibitors, with potential for licensing or further development, especially due to its broad claims.
  • Patent Opponents: Its broad structural claims may be subject to validity challenges, especially if similar compounds are disclosed earlier.
  • Legal and IP Strategists: Recognizing overlapping patents is vital, especially around the reactive warheads and specific target proteins, to avoid infringement.

Conclusion

WIPO patent WO2010022381 robustly protects a class of thiazole derivatives for covalent protein modification. Its claims extend to both compound structures and their use, reflecting a comprehensive IP strategy aligned with advancing covalent inhibitor technology. Given its breadth and strategic filing, the patent significantly contributes to the evolving landscape of covalent drugs, emphasizing the importance of chemical innovation and precise claim drafting for effective patent protection.


Key Takeaways

  • Broad Chemical Coverage: The patent claims encompass a wide array of thiazole derivatives, emphasizing the core structure's flexibility to protect diverse compounds.
  • Hybrid Claims Strategy: Combining chemical composition and therapeutic use claims enhances protection and market leverage.
  • Competitiveness: In a crowded covalent inhibitor landscape, this patent stands out with its innovative structure and strategic geographic scope.
  • Validity Considerations: The broad claims' validity hinges on novelty and inventive step over prior art; targeted patent searches are essential.
  • Strategic Positioning: Novartis’s filings position the company as a leader in covalent drug discovery, aligning with recent success stories in targeted therapy.

FAQs

Q1: How does WO2010022381 differ from other covalent kinase inhibitor patents?
A1: It introduces a unique thiazole scaffold capable of covalent modification with specific reactive groups, broadening the chemical space compared to existing acrylamide-based inhibitors.

Q2: Are the claims in WO2010022381 limited to kinase targets?
A2: No, while kinase inhibition appears to be a primary focus, the broad language encompasses covalent modification of various proteins, extending potential applications.

Q3: Can the patent be challenged based on prior art?
A3: Yes, particularly regarding the novelty of the chemical structures and reactive groups, as prior disclosures of covalent modifiers and thiazole derivatives exist.

Q4: What strategic advantages does broad claiming confer?
A4: It affords extensive patent coverage, reducing the risk of competitors developing similar compounds that bypass narrower claims.

Q5: How should a company approach freedom-to-operate analysis with this patent?
A5: Companies should conduct comprehensive patent landscape searches, focusing on specific structural features and reactive warheads, to identify potential infringement risks.


Sources

[1] World Intellectual Property Organization. WO2010022381 patent application.
[2] Li, et al., "Covalent Kinase Inhibitors," Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 2019.
[3] Lee, et al., "Design Strategies in Covalent Drug Discovery," Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology, 2021.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.