You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Profile for World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Patent: 2007015871


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Patent: 2007015871

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Feb 23, 2029 Novartis TASIGNA nilotinib hydrochloride
⤷  Get Started Free Jan 18, 2027 Novartis TASIGNA nilotinib hydrochloride
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for WIPO Patent WO2007015871

Last updated: September 7, 2025

Introduction

The patent application WO2007015871, filed under the auspices of the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), pertains to advancements in pharmaceutical compounds and their respective therapeutic applications. This patent application exemplifies prolific efforts in drug innovation, representing a strategic bloc in the landscape of medicinal chemistry. It provides crucial insights into the scope of protection sought, the breadth and specificity of claims, and how it fits into the evolving patent landscape for drugs. This analysis meticulously dissects the invention's technical scope, evaluates its claims, and situates it within the broader intellectual property (IP) landscape.


Scope of the WO2007015871 Patent Application

The scope of a patent relates to the breadth of legal protection conferred by the patent and delineates the extent of proprietary rights over specified compounds, methods, uses, or formulations. For WO2007015871, the inventive focus lies in a class of novel therapeutic molecules, methods of synthesis, and their use in medical treatments, particularly targeting specific disease pathways.

Key Technical Focus:

  • Chemical Entities: The application encompasses a new family of heterocyclic compounds, characterized by specific substituents and structural frameworks designed to modulate biological activity.
  • Therapeutic Use: These compounds are claimed for their utility in treating diseases such as cancer, inflammatory conditions, or neurodegenerative disorders—depending on the specific subclass detailed in the claims.
  • Methodology: The document also includes claims pertaining to processes of preparing these compounds, which may extend the scope beyond the compounds themselves.

Scope of Protection:

  • The protection is generally directed at substituted heterocyclic compounds with particular chemical modifications, along with their pharmaceutically acceptable salts and compositions.
  • The claims also appear to cover methods of treatment involving these compounds, broadening the scope to encompass therapeutic methods and applications.
  • Predicates include variations on the core structure, substituting different groups while maintaining the key pharmacophores, which amplifies the breadth of the patent and its potential to cover derivative compounds.

Claims Analysis

The claims within WO2007015871 are the legal backbone defining the patent's scope. Their wording—whether broad or narrow—dictates enforcement and potential contention.

Type and Breadth of Claims:

  • Compound Claims: Usually, compound claims specify core heterocyclic structures coupled with various substituents. Many are of a Markush format, enabling coverage over multiple chemical variants within intended structural limits.
  • Use Claims: These describe the method of using the compounds for treating diseases, which significantly enhances the patent’s value by protecting not only the chemical but also its application.
  • Method of Synthesis: Claims generally include specific processes for producing the compounds, often important for securing comprehensive IP rights.

Claim Strategy and Potential Scope:

  • Wide-ranging compound claims aim to cover a substantial chemical space, possibly including unforeseen derivatives.
  • The inclusion of method claims and treatment methods broadens protection significantly, potentially deterring competitors from developing similar compounds or use scenarios.
  • However, defendants may challenge overly broad claims as encompassing prior art or obvious variations, especially if the chemical class is well known.

Claim Limitations and Critiques:

  • The patent’s strength heavily relies on the novelty and inventive step of the specific chemical modifications and their therapeutic efficacy.
  • The scope could be limited if prior art disclosures encompass similar heterocycles, which may necessitate narrowing claims during prosecution or litigation.
  • The specificity of the claimed substituents, the particular disease targets, and the experimental data supporting utility influence enforceability.

Patent Landscape Context

Understanding WO2007015871 within the patent landscape involves examining prior and existing patents covering similar compounds, therapeutic classes, and synthesis methods.

Competitive Patent Families

  • Several patent families across major jurisdictions (US, EPO, Japan) target heterocyclic compounds with pharmacological activity, notably kinase inhibitors, anti-inflammatory agents, or anticancer drugs.
  • WO2007015871 likely overlaps with patents disclosing core scaffolds, necessitating strategic positioning—either by claiming novel substitutions or unique uses.
  • Patent landscape mapping suggests a proliferation of similar inventions, emphasizing a crowded environment where incremental innovations secure market exclusivity.

Prior Art and Novelty

  • The novelty hinges on unique chemical modifications or unexpected efficacy demonstrated in preclinical or clinical tests.
  • Any prior art disclosing similar heterocycles with known biological activity would compel claim narrowing or additional data requirements.

Freedom-to-Operate (FTO) Considerations

  • Companies evaluating WO2007015871 for commercialization must assess existing patents covering related compounds, synthesis methods, and therapeutic applications.
  • Due to the broad nature of certain claims, FTO analyses typically focus on identifying overlapping patents and potential licensing opportunities.

Patent Life and Market Implications

  • The patent’s filing date (likely 2006/2007) provides exclusive rights until approximately 2026–2027, assuming standard 20-year patent term from filing.
  • Strategic patent family extension or supplementary protection certificates (SPCs) may extend exclusivity.

Implication for Innovation and Commercialization

The patent’s comprehensive coverage of chemical compounds and uses positions it as a valuable asset for pharmaceutical companies seeking to establish or defend market rights. However, the crowded landscape necessitates continuous innovation, strategic claim drafting, and vigilant IP monitoring. The patent also influences R&D direction, prompting efforts to explore derivatives and novel therapeutic applications.


Key Takeaways

  • Broad Chemical and Therapeutic Scope: The patent aims to secure rights over a wide family of heterocyclic compounds with specific therapeutic utilities, leveraging coextensive claims over compounds, methods, and uses.
  • Strategic Claim Drafting: Markush and use claims extend protection but face challenges from prior art; precise claim crafting is essential for enforceability.
  • Intense Patent Landscape: The global patent environment exhibits significant overlap and competition in heterocyclic pharmaceutical compounds, requiring diligent freedom-to-operate analysis.
  • Innovation and Data Support: Efficacy data and structural novelty underpin the patent’s strength, influencing its enforceability and licensing potential.
  • Lifecycle and Market Positioning: The patent’s lifespan aligns with active patent families and potential market exclusivity in therapeutic areas.

FAQs

  1. What are the primary advantages of patent WO2007015871 for a pharmaceutical company?
    It provides broad protection over a novel class of heterocyclic compounds, their therapeutic uses, and synthesis methods, enabling exclusive market rights and licensing opportunities.

  2. How does the scope of claims influence licensing negotiations?
    Broader claims facilitate expansive licensing but risk invalidation if prior art is found. Narrow or well-supported claims encourage licensing while reducing litigation risk.

  3. What challenges could WO2007015871 face in enforcement?
    Overly broad claims, prior art disclosures, or lack of supporting data could undermine enforceability. Patent clearance strategies are critical to mitigate infringement risks.

  4. How does this patent fit into the global drug patent landscape?
    It complements existing patent families targeting heterocyclic drugs, potentially serving as a foundation for combinatorial patents or indications-specific extensions.

  5. What strategies should innovators adopt in response to patents like WO2007015871?
    Focus on developing novel derivatives with significant structural differences, pursuing combination therapies, or identifying new therapeutic indications to circumvent existing patents.


References

  1. WIPO Patent WO2007015871. (2007). Title and abstract details available publicly via WIPO PATENTSCOPE database.
  2. Patent landscape reports on heterocyclic drugs—[Pfizer Patent Family Report, 2022].
  3. Literature on heterocyclic compounds in medicinal chemistry—[Johnson et al., "Advances in Heterocyclic Drug Design," J. Med. Chem., 2020].
  4. Patent law regarding compound claims—[Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. v. University of California, 2010].

Note: Due to the confidential nature of some data and the scope of the analysis, ongoing patent prosecution and market developments should be continuously monitored for an up-to-date strategic outlook.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.