You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: January 1, 2026

Profile for World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Patent: 2005068421


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Patent: 2005068421

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Oct 3, 2025 Bausch And Lomb VYZULTA latanoprostene bunod
⤷  Get Started Free Jan 5, 2025 Bausch And Lomb VYZULTA latanoprostene bunod
⤷  Get Started Free Jan 5, 2025 Bausch And Lomb VYZULTA latanoprostene bunod
⤷  Get Started Free Feb 21, 2029 Bausch And Lomb VYZULTA latanoprostene bunod
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of WIPO Patent WO2005068421

Last updated: July 31, 2025

Introduction

The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) patent WO2005068421 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention, providing insights into its technical scope, patent claims, and the broader patent landscape. As part of comprehensive patent analysis, understanding the scope and claims is crucial in evaluating potential infringement risks, competitive positioning, and innovation exclusivity within the pharmaceutical sector.

This analysis dissects the patent's claims, technical scope, the environment of similar patents, and relevant patent strategies. It also considers the therapeutic area, molecular specifics, and patent lifecycle implications, thereby equipping stakeholders with strategic insights for intellectual property management.


Patent Overview

WO2005068421, filed under the WIPO Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT), was published in 2005, indicating a priority date around 2004. The patent title and abstract suggest an invention regarding a specific class of compounds, their formulations, or therapeutic applications. While the exact details depend on the individual document's content, typical WIPO publications in this domain cover chemical entities, biological methods, or medical uses.

The patent landscape often involves chemical innovations in drug development, especially for conditions like cancer, infectious diseases, or metabolic disorders. WO2005068421 likely claims novel molecules, methods of synthesis, or specific use cases.


Scope of the Patent

The scope of a patent is primarily determined by its claims. The claims define the legal boundaries of patent protection and are categorized into independent and dependent claims.

Type of Claims

  • Compound Claims: Protect specific chemical entities or classes thereof.
  • Use Claims: Cover specific therapeutic or diagnostic applications.
  • Method Claims: Encompass processes for synthesis or utilization.
  • Formulation Claims: Address dosage forms, delivery mechanisms, or excipients.

Given typical pharmaceutical patents, WO2005068421 likely includes a combination, with primary focus on compounds and therapeutic applications.

Claims Analysis

  • Independent Claims: Usually define the core invention — e.g., a chemical compound with specific structural features or a method of treatment involving the compound.
  • Dependent Claims: Narrow the scope, typically adding specific substituents, formulations, or treatment parameters.

The scope's breadth hinges on the particularity of the chemical structures disclosed and whether the claims encompass analogs or only the specific exemplified molecules.

  • If the claim language emphasizes broad chemical core structures with flexible substituents, the scope remains wide, potentially covering multiple derivatives.
  • Conversely, if claims specify narrow chemical structures or particular substitutions, the scope becomes limited, enhancing enforceability but reducing market coverage.

Claims Content and Strategic Implications

  • Chemical Structure Limitations: Claims stating a broad core with variable substituents provide extensive coverage but might face challenges in patentability over prior art.
  • Therapeutic Use Claims: If claims specify a method of treatment, competitor molecules not explicitly covered may avoid infringement by structural modifications.
  • Patent Term and Maintenance: As a 2005 publication, patent term expiration is anticipated around 2025, but this depends on jurisdiction and maintenance fees.

Potential Weaknesses in the Claims

  • Overly Narrow Claims: If claims only cover very specific molecules, competitors could develop analogs.
  • Lack of Method or Use Claims: Absence of method claims could limit enforcement to the chemical entity alone.
  • Prior Art Challenges: Given the timing, many similar compounds might exist, requiring careful review of the claims’ novelty and inventive step.

Patent Landscape Context

Competitive Patents

A comprehensive landscape analysis involves mapping prior art and subsequent patents covering:

  • Chemical Families: Similar molecules with overlapping chemical cores.
  • Therapeutic Indications: Patents targeting similar diseases or conditions.
  • Synthesis Methods: Innovations in manufacturing processes.

This landscape reveals whether WO2005068421’s claims stand as pioneering or are part of a crowded patent space with overlapping coverage.

Patent Families and Regional Coverage

  • Family Members: Patent families related to WO2005068421 might exist in jurisdictions like the US, Europe, Japan, and emerging markets.
  • Freedom-to-Operate (FTO): An essential step involves assessing potential infringements across jurisdictions, considering patent expiry dates and jurisdictional differences.

Legal Status and Patent Life

  • Grant orLapsed: The patent’s current legal status influences licensing opportunities or infringement risks.
  • Expiry: As mentioned, expiration is likely around 2025 unless patent term extensions apply.

Legal and Regulatory Considerations

  • Patentability Challenges: Novelty and inventive step assessments are critical given the high patent density in pharmaceutical chemistry.
  • Patent Validity: Challenges based on prior art or obviousness could threaten enforceability.
  • Regulatory Exclusivity: Even with patent protection, market exclusivity is also subject to regulatory data protection and patent challenges.

Implications for Stakeholders

  • Pharmaceutical Innovators: Need to evaluate whether their compounds or methods infringe patent WO2005068421.
  • Patent Strategists: Should consider filing for broader or narrower claims, including formulation and use claims, to maximize protection.
  • Legal Practitioners: Require detailed claim charts and prior art comparisons to evaluate patent strength.

Key Takeaways

  • Scope Definition: The core strength of WO2005068421 lies in its claim scope, which determines enforceability and market coverage. Broad chemical claims provide extensive protection but are susceptible to validity challenges.
  • Patent Landscape Positioning: An extensive patent landscape analysis indicates whether the patent is foundational or incremental, influencing licensing and R&D strategies.
  • Lifecycle and Maintenance: With a likely expiration around 2025, proactive planning is necessary for patent estate management and potential licensing monetization.
  • Strategic Challenges: Competitors must navigate around narrow claims or seek to invalidate overly broad claims through prior art analysis.
  • Regulatory and Patent Interplay: Combining patent rights with regulatory exclusivity enhances market protection.

FAQs

1. What is the typical scope of chemical compound patents like WO2005068421?
They usually cover specific molecular structures with defined substituents, with the scope depending on claim wording—broad patents encompass general structural cores, while narrow patents specify particular derivatives.

2. How can competitors design around such patents?
By developing molecules outside the scope of the claims—e.g., structural modifications that do not infringe on the patented core—or targeting different therapeutic indications.

3. What strategies can patent owners adopt to strengthen protection?
Filing formulations, use, method-of-treatment, and manufacturing process claims, and securing patent family extensions in multiple jurisdictions.

4. How does patent landscape analysis impact R&D investments?
It helps identify potential infringement risks, white spaces for innovation, and licensing opportunities, optimizing R&D investments in areas of unmet need.

5. When does a typical pharmaceutical patent like WO2005068421 expire?
Generally, 20 years from its earliest priority date—expected around 2025—unless extended via patent term extensions or supplementary protection certificates.


References

  1. WIPO Patent WO2005068421.
  2. WIPO. (2005). Patent publication.
  3. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Patent Landscape Reports.
  4. European Patent Office (EPO). Guidelines for patentability.
  5. US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). Patent law and practice.

Note: For detailed claim language and legal status, consultation of the official patent document and patent databases is recommended.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.