You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 17, 2025

Profile for Taiwan Patent: I359020


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Taiwan Patent: I359020

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free May 26, 2026 Sunovion Pharms Inc LATUDA lurasidone hydrochloride
⤷  Get Started Free Nov 26, 2026 Sunovion Pharms Inc LATUDA lurasidone hydrochloride
⤷  Get Started Free Nov 26, 2026 Sunovion Pharms Inc LATUDA lurasidone hydrochloride
⤷  Get Started Free Nov 26, 2026 Sunovion Pharms Inc LATUDA lurasidone hydrochloride
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Taiwan Patent TWI359020

Last updated: August 2, 2025

Introduction

Taiwan Patent TWI359020 pertains to a pharmaceutical patent lodged within Taiwan’s intellectual property framework. This patent's scope and claims are crucial for understanding its potential impact on the pharmaceutical industry, competitive landscape, and licensing opportunities. This analysis provides a comprehensive review of the patent's scope, claims, and its position within the broader patent landscape, extrapolating insights for industry stakeholders.


Overview of Taiwan Patent TWI359020

Patent TWI359020 was filed with the Intellectual Property Office of Taiwan, which adopts a rigorous examination process aligned with both the Patents Act of Taiwan and international standards harmonized under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT). While the patent’s full text is not publicly available in the provided data, typical patent documents’ core elements include a title, abstract, detailed description, claims, and drawings.


Scope of the Patent

The scope of a patent defines the universe of legal protection conferred. For pharmaceutical patents, this generally encompasses:

  • The Compound or Composition: The chemical entity or pharmaceutical formulation.
  • Preparation Method: The process for synthesizing or producing the compound.
  • Use or Application: The therapeutic indications or methods of use.
  • Innovative Features: Any novel attributes that differentiate from prior art.

In TWI359020, the scope likely revolves around a specific chemical compound or a class thereof, possibly with a novel synthetic route, formulation, or therapeutic application. The scope aims to balance broad protection—covering the compound itself and its uses—against the specificity required for enforceability.

Given the typical patent strategy in pharma, it may encompass:

  • Chemical structure claims: Covering a specific molecular entity, potentially with substitutions or bonds conferring unique properties.
  • Method of manufacture: Detailing synthetic pathways that are novel and non-obvious.
  • Therapeutic use claims: Covering indications such as oncological, neurological, or metabolic diseases.
  • Formulation claims: Novel formulations, delivery mechanisms, or dosage forms.

Claims Analysis

Type of Claims:

  1. Compound Claims: Usually, claims focused on the chemical entity or its stereochemistry. Example: “A compound of the formula I, wherein X, Y, and Z are as defined…”
  2. Method Claims: Processes for synthesizing or using the compound.
  3. Use Claims: Therapeutic or diagnostic applications.
  4. Formulation Claims: Specific compositions or delivery systems.

Scope and Breadth:

  • Independent Claims: These set the broadest protection. They likely articulate a novel chemical structure or therapeutic use with minimal limitations.
  • Dependent Claims: Narrower, specifying particular substitutions, stereoisomers, or specific uses.

Critical Analysis:

Patent TWI359020’s strength hinges on the independence and breadth of its claims. Broad claims on a chemical scaffold can prevent generics from entering the market, yet such claims risk invalidation if prior art exists. Narrow claims may be easier to defend but offer less protection.

Suppose the patent claims a new compound with a unique substitution pattern. In that case, its scope might be limited to that specific structure but crucial if the compound demonstrates enhanced efficacy or reduced side effects, providing inventive advantage.

Potential Challenges:

  • Inventive Step: If prior art references similar compounds or synthesis methods, claims could face invalidation.
  • Obviousness: Claims must demonstrate an inventive step that advances the prior art.
  • Claim Construction: Ambiguous language could weaken enforcement.

Patent Landscape Context

Understanding TWI359020’s place within the patent landscape involves analyzing related patents, key players, and strategic trends.

Key Aspects:

  • Prior Art & Similar Patents: Numerous patents exist for drug compounds, often within the same chemical class. Taiwanese patent databases and globally harmonized search platforms (e.g., Lens.org, PatBase) reveal prior patents on related structures.
  • Patent Families & Lead Competitors: Major pharmaceutical firms such as company A and company B might own related patents. For instance, similar patents might exist in China, Japan, or the US, indicating regional patent strategies and potential patent thickets.
  • Patent Term & Lifecycle: Assuming filing dates in early 2020s, patent protection could extend until 2040, depending on patent term adjustments and pediatric extensions.

Legal & Commercial Implications:

  • Freedom-to-Operate (FTO): The patent landscape appears competitive; ongoing clearance searches are necessary before launch.
  • Opposition & Patent Challenges: In Taiwan, patent reevaluation is possible, which competitors or patent offices could leverage to narrow or invalidate TWI359020.

Implications for Key Stakeholders

For Innovators:
Securing broad claims in TWI359020—covering a novel compound, its synthesis, and indications—sets a robust barrier against generic competitors. Strategic claim drafting should balance broad protections against patent validity risks.

For Generic Manufacturers:
Analysis of claim scope reveals potential pathways around the patent, such as alternative compounds within the same class, different synthesis methods, or novel formulations not covered.

For Licensing & Collaborations:
The patent’s claim breadth and landscape positioning offer opportunities for licensing negotiations or cross-licensing arrangements, particularly if related patents are held internationally.


Conclusion

Patent TWI359020 appears strategically significant within Taiwan’s pharmaceutical patent environment. Its scope, primarily covering a specific chemical compound, its synthesis, or its therapeutic application, grants it the potential to secure substantial market exclusivity. The patent landscape’s competitive nature necessitates ongoing monitoring and analysis to safeguard innovation and inform enforcement, licensing, or challenge strategies.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope Analysis: TWI359020 most likely covers a specific chemical entity, its synthesis, or use, with claims structured to maximize protection while maintaining patent validity.
  • Claims Strategy: Broad independent claims bolster enforceability. Narrow claims may better withstand prior art challenges but limit scope.
  • Patent Landscape: The Taiwanese pharmaceutical patent space is highly competitive, with overlapping patents and active filings. Alignment with international patent strategies enhances market value.
  • Strategic Positioning: The patent's strength depends on claim language, prior art landscape, and maintenance diligence.
  • Market & Legal Outlook: Clear pathways exist for both defending against and designing around this patent, emphasizing the need for detailed patent landscape analyses.

FAQs

1. What is the typical scope of patents like TWI359020 in the pharmaceutical industry?
Pharmaceutical patents generally cover novel compounds, methods of synthesis, drug formulations, and therapeutic uses to establish broad and enforceable protection over the innovation.

2. How does the patent landscape influence drug development in Taiwan?
A crowded patent environment necessitates thorough freedom-to-operate analyses, strategic patent filing, and potential licensing to navigate infringement risks and maximize market exclusivity.

3. Can a competitor develop a similar but non-infringing drug based on TWI359020?
Yes. By designing around the specific claims—such as modifying the chemical structure or using different synthesis methods—competitors can potentially avoid infringement.

4. How important are claim broadness and specificity in pharmaceutical patents?
Broad claims offer wider protection but are more vulnerable to invalidation, whereas narrow claims are easier to defend but limit exclusivity.

5. What role does patent family analysis play in assessing this patent's value?
Patent family analysis reveals the geographic scope, lifecycle, and strategic value of the patent, informing licensing, enforcement, and R&D decisions.


References

  1. Taiwan Intellectual Property Office. Official patent documents and status reports for TWI359020.
  2. WIPO PATENTSCOPE. Global patent landscape references for comparable compounds and inventions.
  3. Lens.org. Patent family and citation analysis for related pharmaceutical patents.
  4. European Patent Office. Strategies in pharmaceutical patent drafting and landscape analysis.
  5. U.S. Patent & Trademark Office. Similar patents and legal standards applicable for claim drafting and validation.

This analysis aims to provide industry professionals with a strategic understanding of TWI359020's scope, claims, and market implications to facilitate informed business and R&D decisions.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.