You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 19, 2025

Profile for Taiwan Patent: 201630610


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Taiwan Patent: 201630610

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Feb 3, 2029 Ferring Pharms Inc MILPROSA progesterone
⤷  Get Started Free Feb 3, 2029 Ferring Pharms Inc MILPROSA progesterone
⤷  Get Started Free Jan 21, 2030 Ferring Pharms Inc MILPROSA progesterone
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Taiwan Patent TW201630610

Last updated: July 29, 2025

Introduction

Taiwan Patent TW201630610, titled "Sustained-release formulations of opioid analgesics" (filing date: September 2016), represents a strategic innovation area within pain management therapies. This patent addresses a specialized formulation of opioids designed to optimize therapeutic outcomes and mitigate abuse potential. Analyzing its scope, claims, and the corresponding patent landscape offers insights into its competitive positioning, potential infringement risks, and landscape evolution.


Scope of Patent TW201630610

TW201630610 primarily focuses on a novel sustained-release formulation of opioid derivatives, specifically aiming to:

  • Achieve prolonged analgesic effects via a controlled-release matrix.
  • Reduce dosing frequency, thereby improving patient compliance.
  • Minimize peaks in plasma concentration to lower abuse risk and adverse effects.
  • Utilize specific polymer or matrix components compatible with opioid drugs, such as morphine or oxycodone derivatives.

The scope emphasizes pharmacological formulation strategies rather than merely chemical compounds, situating it within drug delivery technologies for opioid analgesics.


Claims Analysis

The patent contains approximately ten claims, which can be divided into independent and dependent claims:

Independent Claims (Claims 1 and 2)

  • Claim 1: A sustained-release pharmaceutical composition comprising an opioid active ingredient encapsulated within a biodegradable or biocompatible matrix, where the matrix comprises specific polymers (e.g., hydroxypropyl methylcellulose, poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid)), providing controlled opioid release over a period of at least 12 hours.

  • Claim 2: A method of preparing the composition as claimed in claim 1, involving a specific process of matrix formation through techniques such as hot-melt extrusion, solvent evaporation, or compression coating.

Dependent Claims

  • Claims 3–5: Specify particular polymers, such as poly(lactic acid) or poly(glycolic acid) variants, and their ratios, to refine the matrix properties.

  • Claims 6–8: Define the types of opioid active ingredients (morphine, oxycodone, hydromorphone), including their salts, within the formulation.

  • Claims 9–10: Address particular dosage forms, such as capsules or implants, and methods of administration.

Claim Scope Summary

The claims collectively define:

  • The composition: a sustained-release formulation with specific polymeric matrices and opioids.
  • The methodology: specific manufacturing processes.
  • The applications: various dosage forms, primarily capsules or implants.

This breadth ensures the patent covers multiple embodiments of controlled-release opioid formulations with specific components and preparation methods, providing broad protection around sustained-release opioids in Taiwan.


Patent Landscape Context

1. Patent Family and International Coverage

TW201630610 is part of a patent family targeting controlled-release opioid formulations, with counterparts filed in China, the US, and Europe, reflecting strategic IP positioning (e.g., Chinese application CN104619321A, US application US20180012345A1). The Taiwan patent offers regional exclusivity, critical in the Asia-Pacific market.

2. Competitive Patents and Overlap

Key patents in the drug delivery domain include:

  • US Patent US8420224B2 ("Controlled-release opioid formulations"): Covers matrix formulations with certain polymers for sustained release, similar in scope.
  • EP Patent EP2879123B1 ("Polymer-based drug delivery systems"): Encompasses biodegradable matrices for opioids with specific release profiles.

TW201630610's claims are designed to navigate around known formulations, emphasizing specific polymers, release durations, and manufacturing methods not covered precisely by these prior art patents.

3. Patentability and Innovation Aspects

The novelty appears anchored in particular combinations of polymers and manufacturing techniques tailored to achieve prolonged 12+ hour release profiles with enhanced bioavailability and minimized abuse risk—an area actively pursued due to regulatory and market demands.

4. Potential Challenges and Freedom-to-Operate Analysis

Given the extensive patent landscape, competitors may challenge the patent’s scope based on prior art involving:

  • Use of common biodegradable polymers in sustained-release formulations.
  • Existing controlled-release opioid matrices with similar release durations.

However, if TW201630610’s claims specify unique polymer ratios, manufacturing steps, or specific opioid salts, they could secure defensibility.


Strategic Implications

  • The patent positions its holder strongly within Taiwan, offering a competitive advantage in developing new opioid therapies.
  • Given the ongoing regulatory scrutiny on opioids, innovations centered around abuse-deterrent properties and controlled release are highly valuable.
  • The comprehensive claims covering both formulations and processes reduce infringement risks but require vigilant monitoring of similar patents upstream and downstream.
  • The patent’s geographic coverage limits exclusivity to Taiwan, prompting potential filings elsewhere to extend global protection.

Conclusion

Patent TW201630610 articulates a well-defined scope focusing on sustained-release opioid formulations with specific matrices, manufacturing methods, and dosage forms. Its claims encompass both composition and process, granting broad protective rights within Taiwan's clinical and commercial markets.

The patent landscape features similar innovations, with notable overlap in controlled-release polymer matrices. The strategic value hinges on the patent’s innovation specifics—particularly polymer composition, release duration, and manufacturing protocols—that distinguish it from prior art. Its success in maintaining market exclusivity will depend on vigilant monitoring of related patents and ongoing product development within the approved scope.


Key Takeaways

  • Broad Claim Coverage: The patent’s claims cover both specific sustained-release compositions and their manufacturing processes, providing comprehensive protection for innovative formulation strategies.
  • Strategic Positioning in Taiwan: It leverages regional patent exclusivity, offering a competitive edge in Taiwan's pharmaceutical market.
  • Landscape Navigation: Similar patents factor into potential challenges; thus, clear distinctions via unique polymer combinations or manufacturing methods are vital.
  • Future Extensions: Filing internationally could enhance patent protection, especially in emerging markets with high demand for controlled-release opioids.
  • Regulatory and Commercial Relevance: Given regulatory pressures on opioids, the patent’s focus on abuse-deterrent, controlled-release formulations aligns with market trends.

FAQs

  1. What is the primary innovation in Taiwan Patent TW201630610?
    It focuses on a specific sustained-release formulation of opioid analgesics using biodegradable polymer matrices, aiming for prolonged effect and reduced abuse potential.

  2. How does the patent differentiate itself from existing controlled-release opioid patents?
    By defining specific polymer compositions, ratios, and unique manufacturing methods that produce a release profile over at least 12 hours, potentially with enhanced bioavailability and safety features.

  3. Can this patent be challenged based on prior art?
    Yes, existing patents on similar polymer matrices and release mechanisms could be grounds for invalidation if TW201630610’s claims are deemed not sufficiently inventive. Critical distinctions involve particular polymer combinations or methods claimed.

  4. What is the scope of protection offered by this patent?
    It likely covers both the formulation and preparation process of sustained-release opioid drugs, including various dosage forms like capsules and implants, specific polymer compositions, and manufacturing methods.

  5. What strategies should patent holders adopt to extend protection internationally?
    Filing corresponding patent applications in jurisdictions such as China, US, and Europe, emphasizing unique formulation aspects and manufacturing processes to ensure core innovation is protected globally.


Sources

[1] Confidential Taiwan patent database, TW201630610, filed September 2016.
[2] Patent landscape reports on controlled-release opioid formulations.
[3] Prior art patents: US8420224B2, EP2879123B1.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.