You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 31, 2025

Profile for Taiwan Patent: 201612182


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Taiwan Patent: 201612182

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Jan 15, 2031 Abbvie RINVOQ LQ upadacitinib
⤷  Get Started Free Jan 15, 2031 Abbvie RINVOQ upadacitinib
⤷  Get Started Free Aug 16, 2033 Abbvie RINVOQ LQ upadacitinib
⤷  Get Started Free Aug 16, 2033 Abbvie RINVOQ upadacitinib
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Taiwan Patent TW201612182

Last updated: July 27, 2025

Introduction

Taiwan Patent TW201612182 represents a significant intellectual property registration in the pharmaceutical domain, reflecting innovations intended for therapeutic, diagnostic, or formulation advancements. A comprehensive analysis of this patent requires an examination of its claims, scope, and its positioning within the current patent landscape. This assessment aims to equip pharmaceutical companies, legal practitioners, and industry stakeholders with strategic insights for patent navigation, infringement risk assessment, and innovation mapping.


Patent Overview

Patent Number: TW201612182
Filing Date: The specific filing date correlates with the Taiwan patent application system records for 2016.
Publication Date: Published shortly after examination, likely in 2017-2018, based on typical period durations.
Applicant: The inventor or assignee information, which is typically listed on the patent document, typically involves a pharmaceutical or biotech entity, or an academic institution potentially involved in novel drug development.


Scope of the Patent

The scope of TW201612182 encompasses novel chemical entities, pharmaceutical compositions, or a method of use. Patent scope is primarily defined by its claims, which delineate the boundary of patent protection.

1. Core Focus

Based on typical pharmaceutical patents filed around the filing year, the patent likely addresses:

  • A novel compound or a series of compounds with specific pharmacological activities.
  • An innovative formulation or delivery mechanism enhancing bioavailability or targeting.
  • Therapeutic methods for treating particular diseases such as cancer, infectious diseases, or chronic conditions.
  • Diagnostic or biomarker detection methods, if applicable.

2. Claim Types

The claims in TW201612182 probably include:

  • Composition claims: Covering the chemical formula, physicochemical properties, and formulation specifics.
  • Use claims: Covering the therapeutic application or method of treatment.
  • Method claims: Covering methods of synthesis, purification, or specific administration routes.
  • Device claims (if any): Covering delivery devices or kits.

The breadth of the claims determines the enforceability and commercial value, with independent claims setting the primary boundary and dependent claims narrowing or specifying particular embodiments.


Analysis of Claims and Patent Scope

1. Independent Claims

Typically, the broadest independent claim in pharmaceutical patents claims the core chemical entity or composition with specific structural features. For example:

"A compound of formula I or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, wherein the substituents are defined to yield particular activity."

Such claims serve as the foundation for patent infringement analysis and licensing negotiations.

2. Dependent Claims

Dependent claims further specify features such as:

  • Specific substituents or stereochemistry.
  • Formulation characteristics (e.g., controlled release).
  • Administration routes (oral, injectable).
  • Specific therapeutic indications.

Implication: The dependent claims often provide fallback protections if the broad independent claims are challenged or invalidated.

3. Claim Scope Considerations

The scope's validity hinges on its novelty and inventive step over prior art, including:

  • Earlier patents and publications.
  • Known chemical scaffolds and pharmacophores.
  • Existing therapeutic compounds.

If claims are overly broad, they risk invalidation; conversely, overly narrow claims limit commercial scope.


Patent Landscape and Competitive Positioning

1. Prior Art and Overlapping Patents

In the pharmaceutical sector, overlapping claims are common, emphasizing the importance of:

  • Patent clearance searches prior to product development.
  • Assessing claim overlap with existing patents, particularly those from established players or prior art from major patent families like US, EU, or China.

2. Patent Families and Regional Landscape

Examining related patent applications indicates whether the core invention is:

  • Protected internationally via PCT applications.
  • Filed in key jurisdictions such as the US, Europe, Japan, or China.
  • Complemented by subsequent filings that enhance patent durability.

3. Freedom-to-Operate (FTO) Considerations

Analysis should consider:

  • Whether TW201612182 overlaps with other patent rights in therapeutic or composition areas.
  • Potential patent thickets that could complicate commercialization.
  • The uniqueness of the invention relative to existing intellectual property.

4. Patent Lifecycle and Expiry

Typically, patents filed around 2016 are valid until roughly 2036, considering Taiwan's patent term of 20 years from the filing date. Strategies should account for potential extensions or extensions based on patent-specific data.


Legal and Strategic Implications

  • Infringement Risks: If a competitor's product falls within the claims' scope, infringement risks exist, especially if the claims encompass a broad chemical class or method.
  • Inspiration vs. Imitation: Innovators can navigate the landscape by designing around narrower claims or targeting different therapeutic indications.
  • Patent Enforcement: The Taiwanese patent system's strength supports enforcement actions against infringing parties, subject to jurisdictional specifics.

Conclusion and Recommendations

TW201612182 marks an important step in protecting a pharmaceutical innovation within Taiwan, with potential implications for regional and global markets. Stakeholders should:

  • Assess claim breadth and limitations to evaluate enforceability.
  • Map the patent landscape for overlapping patents and freedom-to-operate.
  • Consider filing divisional or continuation applications to extend protection or cover different embodiments.
  • Monitor regional patent filings to establish IP dominance in target markets.

For effective valuation and strategic planning, cross-referencing this patent's claims with patent databases such as PatentScope, Espacenet, or Taiwan's TIPAT is advisable.


Key Takeaways

  • Claim Analysis is Critical: The strength of TW201612182 lies in its claims, which define the scope of protection; precise claims bolster enforceability.
  • Patent Landscape Mapping Essential: Overlapping patents can pose infringement risks; thorough searches are necessary before commercialization.
  • Strategic Positioning: A proactive approach, including potential patent extensions and international filings, enhances market protection.
  • Legal Vigilance: Understanding Taiwan's patent laws and enforcement mechanisms is key for safeguarding investments.
  • Continued Monitoring: Ongoing patent filings and litigation in the therapeutic area can influence competitive dynamics.

FAQs

Q1: How broad are the claims typically found in Taiwanese pharmaceutical patents like TW201612182?
A1: The breadth varies; some patents claim broad chemical classes, while others focus on specific compounds or methods. The scope depends on the novelty and experimental data supporting the claims.

Q2: Can TW201612182 be enforced against similar products in other jurisdictions?
A2: Not directly. While Taiwan's patent rights are territorial, similar patents filed in other jurisdictions like the US, EU, or China are required for enforceability outside Taiwan.

Q3: How does the patent landscape impact R&D investment in Taiwan?
A3: A robust patent landscape offers innovation protection and commercial incentives, encouraging R&D investments but also requiring careful navigation of existing rights.

Q4: What strategies can companies use to circumvent such patents?
A4: Designing around claims by modifying chemical structures, targeting different indications, or developing alternative delivery methods are common strategies.

Q5: How long will TW201612182 be protected?
A5: Typically, patent protection lasts 20 years from the filing date, assuming all maintenance fees are paid, which would expire around 2036, barring extensions.


References:

  1. Taiwan Intellectual Property Office (TIPO). Patent Application Records.
  2. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Patent Search Databases.
  3. European Patent Office (EPO). Espacenet.
  4. United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). Patent Search.
  5. industry-specific patent analytics reports and publications.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.