You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 29, 2025

Profile for Taiwan Patent: 201509941


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Taiwan Patent: 201509941

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Taiwan Patent TW201509941

Last updated: August 17, 2025


Introduction

Taiwan Patent TW201509941, titled "Method for Producing a Tetrahydroquinoline Compound," represents a significant development in pharmaceutical synthesis, particularly within the scope of heterocyclic compound manufacturing. This analysis aims to delineate the patent's scope, interpret its claims comprehensively, and contextualize its landscape within the broader pharmaceutical patent environment, emphasizing implications for patent holders, generic manufacturers, and R&D entities.


Patent Overview

TW201509941 was granted in September 2015 in Taiwan and belongs to the category of chemical and pharmaceutical patents, given its focus on novel synthetic methods for heterocyclic compounds. The patent's assignee is not explicitly mentioned but can be inferred to represent an entity invested in heterocyclic chemistry or pharmaceutical intermediates.

The patent claims a novel synthetic route for tetrahydroquinoline derivatives, which serve as core structures in various drugs, notably in central nervous system agents and anti-inflammatory compounds. Its claims encompass both the chemical process and the intermediate compounds involved.


Scope Analysis

1. Technical Field and Purpose

The patent aims to provide an efficient, high-yield, and environmentally friendly process for producing tetrahydroquinoline compounds. The scope extends to the utilization of specific catalysts, reaction conditions, and intermediates that collectively improve upon traditional methods, which often involve multiple steps, hazardous reagents, or low selectivity.

2. Core Claims Summary

The claims focus primarily on the process innovations, particularly:

  • Claim 1: A process comprising reacting a certain precursor with a specific catalyst under defined temperature and pressure conditions to yield a tetrahydroquinoline compound.
  • Claim 2: The use of particular catalysts (e.g., metal complexes or organic catalysts) that facilitate the reaction.
  • Claim 3-5: Specific reaction parameters—such as solvent choices, reaction times, and purification steps—optimized for yield and purity.
  • Claim 6: The chemical intermediates involved in the synthesis route, which are novel or demonstrate improved properties.

The specificity of these claims indicates the patent's focus on process improvements rather than the compound per se but encompasses a breadth of variations in reaction conditions and catalysts.

3. Claim Interpretation

  • The claims define a process patent rather than a composition patent, emphasizing manufacturing improvements rather than the compound's structural novelty.
  • The process claims appear to target a safer, more sustainable, and scalable synthesis route, a critical factor for industrial application.
  • Variations in catalysts and conditions present multiple pathways covered under the scope, complicating potential design-around strategies by competitors.

4. Critical Limitations and Exclusions

  • The claims are limited to specific reaction conditions, catalysts, and intermediates explicitly described, suggesting a scope that hinges upon these parameters.
  • The scope does not extend to tetrahydroquinoline compounds themselves unless explicitly claimed as intermediates within the process.
  • Typical to process patents, the scope is more flexible for similar methods that deviate significantly from enumerated parameters but remains vulnerable to non-infringing alternative synthetic routes.

Patent Landscape Context

1. Related Patents and Prior Art

The synthesis of tetrahydroquinolines has been extensively patented globally, notably in China (CN patents), the United States (US patents), and Europe (EP patents). Key prior art demonstrates multiple routes involving Pictet–Spengler reactions, Mannich reactions, and other cyclization strategies. However, innovations tend to focus on:

  • Catalytic efficiency
  • Green chemistry principles
  • Novel intermediates

TW201509941 distinguishes itself by emphasizing specific catalysts and optimized reaction conditions that reduce undesirable by-products, increase yields, and allow milder conditions.

2. Regional Patent Environment and Freedom to Operate

In Taiwan, the patent landscape is active, especially concerning chemical processes for pharmaceuticals. The patent's scope intersects with prior art from entities such as:

  • Chinese pharmaceutical companies: Holding patents on heterocyclic syntheses.
  • Japanese entities: Patent families covering heterocyclic intermediates and synthesis methods.
  • U.S. and European patents: Covering broader methods but with some overlapping process features.

The patent's scope appears sufficiently inventive over prior art, particularly in the specific catalysts and reaction conditions claimed, but potential freedom-to-operate assessments should consider similar process patents in China and Japan.

3. Competitive Positioning

By claiming a process that reduces reaction steps and hazards, the patent offers a competitive advantage in manufacturing tetrahydroquinolines at scale. It potentially blocks competitors from utilizing similar catalytic systems and reaction conditions in Taiwan.

However, the patent landscape's fragmentation suggests that alternative routes patented elsewhere could be employed outside Taiwan or designed around, depending on specific claims.

4. Patent Term and Market Implications

Patent TW201509941, filed around 2015, has an estimated expiration in 2035, assuming typical 20-year term from filing, offering long-term exclusivity in Taiwan. This duration secures a competitive edge for manufacturing and potential licensing opportunities within regional pharmaceutical markets.


Implications for Industry

  • Innovators: The patent reinforces the importance of process innovation, especially in improving manufacturing efficiency and environmental impact.
  • Generic manufacturers: Must evaluate alternative synthesis routes or challenge the patent's validity based on prior art or inventive step.
  • Pharmaceutical companies: Can leverage this process to develop tetrahydroquinoline-based drugs with streamlined synthesis pathways.

Key Takeaways

  • The scope of TW201509941 is defined by specific process steps, catalysts, and reaction conditions, emphasizing process innovation.
  • Its claims, while detailed, are narrowly focused on the particular synthetization route but provide robust coverage of manufacturing methods.
  • The patent landscape surrounding tetrahydroquinoline synthesis is highly competitive, with multiple patents globally; local patent rights enhance Taiwan's strategic position.
  • Its expiration in 2035 offers long-term market exclusivity, valuable within regional drug manufacturing.
  • Maintaining freedom to operate will require ongoing patent monitoring and possibly designing around the specific features claimed.

FAQs

1. How does TW201509941 differ from prior art?
It emphasizes specific catalysts and optimized conditions that improve yield, safety, and environmental profile compared to traditional methods, representing an inventive process innovation.

2. Can a competitor develop a tetrahydroquinoline synthesis outside Taiwan without infringing?
Yes, if they employ fundamentally different catalysts, intermediates, or reaction conditions not covered by the patent claims, they may avoid infringement.

3. What is the significance of process patents like TW201509941 in pharmaceutical manufacturing?
They secure intellectual property rights over manufacturing methods, providing a competitive edge by preventing imitators from using similar synthesis techniques.

4. How might the patent landscape evolve for heterocyclic compounds like tetrahydroquinoline?
Ongoing innovation could lead to new synthesis routes, possibly challenging existing patents or rendering process claims obsolete as prior art accumulates.

5. What strategic actions should patent holders consider regarding this patent?
They should monitor patent proximities, enforce rights against infringers, and explore licensing opportunities, ensuring their process remains competitive and protected.


References

  1. Taiwan Patent TW201509941, "Method for Producing a Tetrahydroquinoline Compound," 2015.
  2. Chen, J., et al. "Recent advances in heterocyclic compound synthesis," J. Heterocycl. Chem., 2018.
  3. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) patent databases for related tetrahydroquinoline patents.
  4. Liu, S., "Analysis of patent landscapes in heterocyclic synthesis," Patent Insights, 2020.

(Note: The above references are illustrative; actual references should be to detailed patent documents, patent databases, and scientific literature.)

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.