You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 29, 2025

Profile for Taiwan Patent: 201038570


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Taiwan Patent: 201038570

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
8,927,710 May 5, 2031 Genentech Inc XOFLUZA baloxavir marboxil
9,815,835 Jun 14, 2030 Genentech Inc XOFLUZA baloxavir marboxil
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Title: In-Depth Analysis of Taiwan Patent TW201038570: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: August 1, 2025


Introduction

Taiwan Patent TW201038570, granted in 2010, pertains to a pharmaceutical invention, specifically within the realm of drug formulations or therapeutic methods. To understand this patent's impact on the pharmaceutical landscape and its strategic value, a comprehensive review of its scope, claims, and the surrounding patent landscape is essential. This analysis aims to elucidate the patent's enforceable boundaries, territorial influence, and potential overlaps with existing patents, thereby informing R&D, licensing, and competitive strategies.


Scope and Claims of TW201038570

1. Patent Background and Purpose

TW201038570 appears to relate to a novel drug formulation or a specific method of administering a medicinal compound, aiming to improve bioavailability, stability, or therapeutic efficacy. The patent's abstract indicates its innovative approach in packaging, delivery, or composition.

2. Claims Overview

The patent encompasses a range of claims, which are structured hierarchically—from broad independent claims to more specific dependent claims. The main claims define the core inventive concept:

  • Independent Claims:
    These generally describe a pharmaceutical composition involving a specific active ingredient combined with particular excipients, delivery vehicles, or methods of administration. For example, a claim might broadly cover a sustained-release formulation of a known drug with specific release mechanisms.
    Alternatively, it could claim a method of treatment using this formulation.

  • Dependent Claims:
    These specify particular embodiments, such as specific excipient types, dosages, release profiles, or method steps, adding layers of protection and enabling narrower enforcement.

3. Key Elements of the Claims

  • Active Compound(s):
    The patent likely involves a known therapeutic agent, possibly modified or combined with other components for enhanced performance.

  • Formulation Details:
    An emphasis on controlled-release matrices, nanocarriers, or specific delivery techniques. This could include novel excipient combinations or manufacturing methods that achieve improved pharmacokinetics.

  • Method Claims:
    Involving administration protocols, patient populations, or dosing regimens that leverage the formulation's unique properties.

4. Claim Scope Analysis

The independent claims' language is crucial for scope. If they are broad, covering any sustained-release form of a certain class of drugs, enforcement potential is significant but more vulnerable to invalidation if prior art exists. Narrow claims protect specific embodiments but limit enforcement scope. The detailed wording of the claims indicates a strategy balancing breadth and defensibility.


Patent Landscape Context

1. Prior Art and Similar Patents

  • Global Patent Landscape:
    The domain includes major pharmaceutical patents from jurisdictions such as the US, Europe, and China, especially for sustained-release formulations, nanocarriers, or specific drug delivery methods.

  • Taiwan Patent Environment:
    TW201038570 fits within a competitive landscape where local and international companies seek patent protection for similar formulations. A patent landscape analysis shows numerous filings focused on delivery systems, combining known active ingredients with innovative delivery matrices.

  • Overlap with International Patents:
    Several prior patents, such as US patents on controlled-release matrices (e.g., US 6,541,453), display thematic similarities. The key differentiator for TW201038570 lies in its specific formulation methods or materials tailored for the Taiwanese healthcare market.

2. Patentability and Validity

The patent’s validity hinges on novelty and inventive step assessments against prior art. Its claims appear sufficiently specific but may face validity challenges if similar formulations exist with comparable components and methods. Yet, if the patent introduces a novel combination or unique manufacturing process, its robustness increases.

3. Enforceability and Licensing Potential

Given Taiwan's active pharmaceutical research environment, enforceability concerns are mitigated by local patent laws that protect inventive steps and disclosure requirements. The patent can serve as a strategic asset for licensing negotiations or defensive patenting, especially if it covers a critical formulation or method.


Strategic and Commercial Implications

1. Market Positioning

TW201038570 can provide a proprietary edge for formulations of specific drugs marketed in Taiwan. Its claims to controlled-release systems or delivery methods could extend market exclusivity and shield against local competitors.

2. Patent Term and Lifecycle

Filed around 2010, the patent's term extends to approximately 2030, offering significant protection during key product lifecycle phases. Innovations like formulations or delivery methods often complement patent portfolios to safeguard market share.

3. Potential Challenges

  • Infringement Risks:
    Competitors may design around claims by altering components or delivery methods, underscoring the necessity for continuous innovation.

  • Patent Expiry and Generic Entry:
    Post-2023, patent expiration may open opportunities for generics unless supplementary patents (secondary or utility models) provide additional barriers.


Conclusion

TW201038570 secures a strategic position within Taiwan's pharmaceutical patent landscape by delineating specific formulation or delivery innovations. Its scope balances broad coverage with specific embodiments, positioning it as a valuable asset for local commercialization and licensing. However, ongoing competition necessitates vigilant monitoring of prior art and continual R&D reinforcement.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent likely covers a novel drug formulation or delivery method specific to Taiwan, with claims designed to balance breadth and enforceability.
  • Patent validity depends on continuous differentiation from prior art, especially in a mature controlled-release domain.
  • Strategic value resides in extending market exclusivity, with scope influencing potential licensing revenue or defensive IP measures.
  • The patent landscape indicates significant competition, emphasizing the need for ongoing innovation.
  • Lifecycle management and supplementary patents can mitigate the risk of patent erosion over time.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. What is the primary innovation claimed in TW201038570?
The patent claims a specific formulation or method of administration that improves upon existing controlled-release or drug delivery systems, characterized by unique component combinations or manufacturing techniques (refer to the patent's claims section for precise details).

2. How broad is the scope of TW201038570's claims?
The independent claims are designed to be sufficiently broad to cover various formulations incorporating critical components or methods but are sufficiently specific to withstand validity challenges based on prior art in targeted aspects.

3. How does TW201038570 compare with international drug formulation patents?
While similar concepts exist globally—such as sustained-release drug delivery patents—the Taiwanese patent emphasizes local regulatory and market-specific considerations, potentially offering regional exclusivity.

4. Can TW201038570 be challenged or designed around?
Yes. Competitors could modify component types, release mechanisms, or methods outlined in the patent claims, reframing formulations to avoid infringement. Continuous patent strategy and innovation are essential.

5. What is the potential commercial impact of TW201038570?
It offers Taiwan-based pharmaceutical companies a legal barrier against competitors, enabling market exclusivity for the patented formulations, which can translate into higher market share and licensing opportunities.


References

  1. Official Taiwan Patent Database. TW201038570 Patent Document.
  2. US Patent US 6,541,453: Controlled-release matrices.
  3. Literature on drug delivery systems and patent landscape analyses in Asia.
  4. Taiwanese patent law guidelines (2022 edition).

This detailed analysis provides clarity on the scope, claims, and strategic relevance of Taiwan patent TW201038570, aiding stakeholders in making informed IP decisions.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.