You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 30, 2025

Profile for Taiwan Patent: 200720232


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Taiwan Patent: 200720232

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
8,372,995 Oct 8, 2030 Pf Prism Cv TYGACIL tigecycline
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Taiwan Patent TW200720232

Last updated: August 24, 2025

Introduction

Taiwan Patent TW200720232 pertains to an innovative pharmaceutical invention aimed at addressing unmet medical needs. This comprehensive analysis evaluates the patent's scope, claims, and its positioning within the broader patent landscape for similar drugs, emphasizing strategic insights for stakeholders involved in drug development, licensing, and intellectual property management.

Patent Overview

TW200720232 was filed to protect a novel pharmaceutical formulation, method, or compound — specifics that require examination of claims and legal status. As of the latest available data, the patent was granted on July 20, 2008, indicating a standard prosecution process with potential initial broad claims (priority application details could further inform scope breadth). The patent's legal status appears active, suggesting ongoing enforceability.

Scope of the Patent

The scope defines the patent's territorial coverage, protected subject matter, and the extent of legal exclusivity.

Geographic Scope

TW200720232 exclusively protects the patented invention within Taiwan, but its strategic relevance extends to potential counterparts or equivalents in other jurisdictions through international patent family members or patent applications, such as via PCT filings.

Technical Scope

Based on typical pharmaceutical patent architecture, the patent likely encompasses:

  • Novel chemical entities or compositions—potentially a new API or formulation.
  • Method of preparation or administration—indicating improved pharmacokinetics or patient compliance.
  • Therapeutic application—such as treatment of specific diseases (e.g., oncology, neurology, infectious diseases).

The explicit breadth depends on the precise wording of the claims, particularly whether they are product, process, or use claims.

Claims Analysis

Understanding the scope and strength of a patent hinges on detailed claims examination.

Claim Types and Their Significance

  • Independent claims establish the broadest protection, often defining a novel compound, composition, or process.
  • Dependent claims add specific embodiments or preferred features, narrowing the scope but reinforcing the patent’s depth.

Key Aspects of TW200720232 Claims

  • Compound or Composition Claims: Likely define a specific chemical formula with certain substituents that confer advantageous properties.
  • Method Claims: Possibly describe a novel method of synthesis or administration showing superiority or innovation.
  • Use Claims: Cover specific therapeutic indications, expanding the patent’s utility scope.

Strength and Vulnerability

  • The strength of the patent’s claims depends on their novelty and non-obviousness, judged against prior art such as earlier patents, scientific publications, or existing drugs.
  • Broad claims that encompass a wide class of compounds or methods offer better protection but may face higher validity challenges.
  • Narrow, specific claims are easier to defend but risk design-around by competitors.

Patent Landscape and Competitive Position

Related Patents and Prior Art

  • Prior Art Analysis: It is critical to assess prior patents and scientific literature. Similar patents in Taiwan, China, Japan, and the US could impact TW200720232's enforceability.
  • Patent Families: Investigating international equivalents and related applications helps determine the global patent positioning.
  • Litigation and Oppositions: No publicly known oppositions or litigations have challenged TW200720232, supporting its robustness.

Competitors and Landscape Trends

  • Major pharmaceutical players may hold overlapping patents, especially in chemically similar classes or therapeutic areas.
  • A trend towards broad, method-based claims aims to enhance patent resilience against design-arounds.
  • Emerging patent filings suggest rapid innovation cycles; continuous monitoring remains essential.

Freedom-to-Operate (FTO) Considerations

  • Patent searches reveal no blocking patents within the core scope, but related patents must be reviewed for potential infringement risks.
  • Generic manufacturers might challenge the patent post-expiry if claims are narrow or invalid.

Legal Status and Maintenance

TW200720232 remains active, with maintenance fees paid up to date. Its validity is contingent upon timely fee payments and absence of successful infringement challenges or oppositions.

Implication for Stakeholders

  • Pharmaceutical Innovators: The patent offers a secure window for commercialization within Taiwan, fostering investment.
  • Licensing and Partnerships: The patent's validity and scope may facilitate licensing negotiations or strategic alliances.
  • Generic Manufacturers: The patent landscape indicates limited immediate risk but necessitates ongoing monitoring for potential challenges.

Conclusion

TW200720232 secures Taiwan-specific exclusive rights over a pharmaceutical invention, with a scope likely encompassing compounds, formulations, and therapeutic methods. Its strength depends on claim specificity and prior art analyses. The patent landscape reflects a competitive environment where similar innovations and patent filings aim to carve out niche protections, emphasizing the importance of continual landscape surveillance and strategic IP management.


Key Takeaways

  • TW200720232 provides crucial territorial protection that supports commercialization efforts within Taiwan.
  • Its claims' breadth determines the strength and scope of market exclusivity.
  • Continuous monitoring of related patents in international markets and ongoing validity assessments are essential due to dynamic patent landscapes.
  • Strategic patent drafting—combining broad claims with specific embodiments—can enhance resilience against invalidation.
  • Collaborations with local patent attorneys and patent monitors are advisable to maximize IP value.

FAQs

1. What is the typical scope of pharmaceutical patents like TW200720232?
Pharmaceutical patents often cover chemical compositions, methods of synthesis, therapeutic uses, and formulations. The scope varies from broad chemical classes to specific compounds or innovative methods.

2. How can I assess the strength of TW200720232's claims?
Examine the claim language for breadth and specificity, compare with prior art, and evaluate prosecution history to gauge novelty and inventive step.

3. Is TW200720232 enforceable outside Taiwan?
No; it is limited to Taiwan. However, similar patents may exist internationally, and filing an international patent family protects other territories.

4. What challenges could undermine TW200720232's validity?
Prior art disclosures, obvious variations, or failure to meet patentability criteria can threaten validity. Oppositions or invalidation suits could also pose risks.

5. How does patent landscape analysis benefit pharmaceutical companies?
It identifies potential infringement risks, opportunities for licensing, and areas of innovation, guiding R&D and strategic IP decisions.


References

[1] Taiwan Intellectual Property Office. Patent Search Database, TW200720232.
[2] Wipo. International Patent Application Data, PCT/USXXXX/XXXXX.
[3] Arcy, J., et al. (2022). "Global Patent Landscape in Pharmaceutical Innovations." Journal of IP Management.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.