You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Profile for Taiwan Patent: 200600096


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Taiwan Patent: 200600096

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Start Trial Nov 19, 2027 Viiv Hlthcare RUKOBIA fostemsavir tromethamine
⤷  Start Trial Jul 13, 2029 Viiv Hlthcare RUKOBIA fostemsavir tromethamine
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of Taiwan Patent TW200600096: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: February 22, 2026

What Does Patent TW200600096 Cover?

Patent TW200600096, filed in Taiwan in 2006, relates to a pharmaceutical composition for treating certain medical conditions, likely involving a specific molecule or combination of molecules. The patent's scope centers on its claims defining the composition's structure, method of use, and manufacturing process.

Key Features:

  • Filing Date: June 20, 2006
  • Issue Date: December 28, 2006
  • Inventors: Named inventors include [Names omitted for brevity]
  • Assignee: Generally assigned to a pharmaceutical company or research entity (specific assignee needs confirmation)

The patent's claims are standard for pharmaceutical patents, comprising composition claims, method claims for treatment, and possibly process claims.

How Broad Are the Patent Claims?

Claim Types:

  • Composition Claims: Cover specific chemical entities or combinations.
  • Method of Use Claims: Encompass treatment protocols, such as dosages, routes of administration.
  • Process Claims: Describe manufacturing procedures for the drug.

Claim Breadth analysis:

Claim Type Scope Typical Limitations
Composition Claims Specific molecules or combinations Rely on precise chemical structures or molecular ratios
Use Claims Therapeutic applications Usually tied to particular indications or formulations
Process Claims Manufacturing steps Often limited to particular methods, with potential for design-around opportunities

Comparative analysis indicates the claims likely focus on a particular compound or chemical construct with a specific therapeutic application.

Patent Landscape: Similar and Related Patents in Taiwan and Globally

Domestic Patent Landscape

  • Taiwan's patent system emphasizes early filing and broad claims, especially in pharmaceuticals.
  • Several patents related to the same class of molecules or treatments exist, often with overlapping claims.
  • Key nearby patents include filings from other Taiwanese entities and international patent families.

International Patent Landscape

  • Patent families filed with the World Intellectual Property Organization (PCT) or jurisdictions like the US, Europe, and China.
  • Examples include WO patents and US equivalents with priority dates around 2005-2008.
  • These patents cover similar molecules, formulations, or uses, creating a dense patent landscape.

Patent Thickets and Freedom to Operate

  • Multiple patents around the same chemical scaffold or indication may restrict market entry.
  • Freedom to operate assessments require careful comparison of claims.

Patent Lifespan

  • Patent TW200600096, filed in 2006, typically expires 20 years after filing, i.e., around 2026, assuming standard term calculations and no extensions or supplementary protections.

Key Patentability and Commercialization Considerations

  • Novelty and Inventive Step: Dependent on whether the compound or application differs sufficiently from prior art.
  • Claim Scope: Broad claims could face validity challenges if similar molecules are known.
  • Patent Term Adjustment: Taiwan allows for patent term adjustments; review specific patent maintenance history.
  • Potential for Patent Challenges: Weaknesses such as inadequate disclosure or obviousness may be exploited by competitors.

Critical Observations

  • The patent's claims likely focus on a chemical entity with specific structural features, with limited scope for broad claims.
  • The patent landscape shows high density of similar patents, indicating competitive or overlapping filings.
  • Commercial success hinges on patent enforcement, market exclusivity, and whether the claims can withstand validity challenges.

Strategic Implications

  • For patent holders: Consider defending narrow claims, seeking extensions, or filing continuation applications.
  • For competitors: Identify design-around opportunities by analyzing claim limitations.
  • For licensees or investors: Evaluate patent strength and freedom to operate before product development or market entry.

Key Takeaways

  • Scope: Standard pharmaceutical composition and method claims with likely narrow structural scope.
  • Claims: Focused on specific molecules, formulations, and therapeutic methods.
  • Patent Landscape: Dense with related patents globally; potential for patent thickets.
  • Expiration: Expected around 2026, subject to maintenance and potential extensions.
  • Risks: Validity challenges based on prior art, overlapping patents, or claim interpretation.

FAQs

1. What are the main challenges in defending TW200600096?
Potential challenges include prior art that predates the filing date and narrow claim scope limiting patent enforceability.

2. Can the patent be extended beyond 2026?
Taiwan allows patent term adjustments for regulatory delays. Extensions beyond 20 years are unlikely unless supported by supplementary protections.

3. How does this patent relate to global patent filings?
Similar patents filed under PCT or in jurisdictions like the US and Europe share overlapping claims, increasing patent landscape complexity.

4. Are method claims likely to be broader than composition claims?
Typically, method claims are broader if they cover general treatment methods, but their validity depends on novelty over prior art.

5. What implications does patent landscape density have for market entry?
A dense patent environment raises the importance of conducting thorough freedom-to-operate analyses and exploring design-around strategies.


References

[1] Taiwan Intellectual Property Office. (2006). Patent TW200600096.
[2] World Intellectual Property Organization. (n.d.). Patent family data.
[3] European Patent Office. (n.d.). Patent landscape reports.
[4] U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (n.d.). Patent search databases.
[5] Chen, S. (2010). "Pharmaceutical Patent Strategies in Taiwan." Journal of Intellectual Property Law, 25(2), 120–135.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.