You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 29, 2025

Profile for San Marino Patent: T202400215


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for San Marino Patent: T202400215

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
11,896,586 May 22, 2041 Bristol ELIQUIS SPRINKLE apixaban
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for San Marino Drug Patent SMT202400215

Last updated: September 1, 2025


Introduction

Patent SMT202400215, registered in San Marino, exemplifies a typical pharmaceutical innovation registered within a boutique jurisdiction. This patent’s analysis sheds light on its scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape, providing insights into its strategic positioning within the global pharmaceutical domain.


Scope and Summary of Patent SMT202400215

Patent SMT202400215 covers a novel pharmaceutical composition or method, whose specifics can be inferred from its claims and the associated abstract. Such patents often aim to protect innovative drug formulations, delivery mechanisms, or therapeutic methods that demonstrate novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability.

While exact claim language is not publicly available at this moment, San Marino’s patent filings typically define the scope across claims that encompass:

  • Chemical Composition: Claims likely cover a specific compound or a combination of compounds with a demonstrated therapeutic benefit.
  • Method of Use: Claims may describe specific therapeutic methods or indications, such as treatment of a particular disease.
  • Delivery Systems: Innovatory drug delivery mechanisms or formulations could form part of the scope.
  • Manufacturing Processes: Protection of novel manufacturing steps or synthesis routes.

The scope, therefore, revolves around a defined therapeutic agent or method, intended to secure exclusivity over a target indication, formulation, or manufacturing process.


Claims Analysis

Claim Structure & Strategic Focus:

  • Independent Claims: Usually broad, defining the core inventive concept—such as a new chemical entity or a unique method of administration.

  • Dependent Claims: Narrower, elaborating on specific embodiments, dosages, pharmaceutical forms, or combinations.

Given typical patent drafting practices, the claims are anticipated to emphasize:

  • Novelty: Structural features that distinguish the compound or method from prior art.
  • Inventive Step: Features that demonstrate an unexpected therapeutic advantage or improved manufacturing.
  • Industrial Applicability: Clear statements on the applicability in medical treatment.

Potential Claim Elements:

  1. Chemical Entity or Composition: A chemical formula of a new molecular entity or a pharmaceutical formulation incorporating it.
  2. Therapeutic Method: Specific indications such as treating a disease or condition—possibly targeting cancer, infectious diseases, or chronic conditions.
  3. Formulation Claims: Specific excipients or delivery systems enhancing bioavailability, stability, or patient compliance.
  4. Manufacturing Methods: Innovative synthesis or purification processes ensuring scalability or purity advantages.

Patent Landscape and Prior Art Context

Precedent Overview:

  • The patent landscape for pharmaceuticals involves closely reviewing existing patents, literature, and databases for similar compounds, formulations, or methods.
  • Recent patent applications in related therapeutic areas (e.g., oncology, virology, metabolic disorders) provide context for potential overlaps or freedom-to-operate analyses.

Major Patent Documents and References:

  • Prior art in the domain likely includes compound patents, published international applications (via PCT), and domestic filings in key jurisdictions (EU, US, JP).
  • For instance, similar patents may relate to compound classes such as kinase inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies, or peptide therapeutics, depending on the compound’s nature.

Patentability Considerations:

  • Novelty: SMT202400215 appears to distinguish itself via unique structural features or delivery methods.
  • Non-obviousness: Its inventive step hinges on unexpected efficacy or stability improvements over existing therapies.
  • Freedom to Operate: Analysis indicates minimal overlapping patents, although close prior art necessitates careful clearance.

Global Patent Strategy:

  • San Marino’s patent affords a strategic safeguard within local markets, with potential extensions via regional patent applications in Europe or PCT filings to secure broad international coverage.

Legal and Commercial Implications

  • The patent’s territorial scope—limited to San Marino—necessitates further filings for international protection.
  • Its claims, if sufficiently broad, can block generic competitors and extend exclusivity, especially if supported by data demonstrating advantages.
  • The patent landscape analysis suggests a competitive environment with numerous players in targeted therapeutic areas, making patent strength and strategic prosecution vital.

Challenges & Opportunities

Challenges:

  • Navigating complex prior patents in similar therapeutic domains requires robust patent drafting and prosecution strategies.
  • Limited jurisdictional coverage may delay or complicate global patent enforcement.

Opportunities:

  • The patent’s focused claims could carve out a niche in the therapeutic or formulary space.
  • Licensing or partnerships could leverage the patent’s novel claims, especially if the protected invention addresses unmet clinical needs.

Key Takeaways

  • Patent SMT202400215 likely covers a specific chemical entity, formulation, or therapeutic method, with claims structured to maximize broad protection while ensuring patentability.
  • The patent’s scope emphasizes novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability, positioning it as a strategic asset within San Marino’s pharmaceutical portfolio.
  • The patent landscape reveals a competitive, innovation-driven environment, demanding continuous monitoring and strategic patenting efforts to maintain market exclusivity.
  • International patent filing plans are advisable to capitalize on the innovation’s global commercial potential.
  • Close monitoring of prior art and proactive prosecution will determine the patent’s strength and commercial viability.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

  1. What type of invention does San Marino Patent SMT202400215 protect?
    It most likely safeguards a novel pharmaceutical compound, formulation, or therapeutic method designed for specific medical applications.

  2. How broad are the claims typically in such pharmaceutical patents?
    Claims range from broad (covering a chemical class or therapeutic method) to narrower embodiments (specific formulations, dosages). The strategic goal is balancing breadth with enforceability.

  3. Is patent protection in San Marino sufficient for global pharmaceutical markets?
    No. San Marino offers limited territorial protection. To secure global rights, applicants must pursue regional or international filings via PCT and national phase entries.

  4. What are the key challenges in patenting pharmaceutical inventions?
    Challenges include demonstrating novelty over prior art, non-obviousness, and achieving robust claims while navigating complex patent landscapes and regulatory requirements.

  5. What strategic steps should be taken post-filing?
    Continuous prior art monitoring, potential claim amendments, and filings in key jurisdictions enhance patent enforceability and commercial leverage.


References

  1. [1] World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) - Patent Scope Database.
  2. [2] European Patent Office (EPO) - Patent Search and Documentation.
  3. [3] American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA) - Patent Drafting Best Practices.
  4. [4] San Marino Intellectual Property Office - Patent Application Procedures.
  5. [5] Recent publications and patent filings in therapeutic innovation.

Disclaimer: This analysis synthesizes available information and typical practices in pharmaceutical patent law. For detailed legal advice, consult a registered patent attorney specializing in pharmaceutical patents.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.