You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: January 1, 2026

Profile for San Marino Patent: T202100638


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for San Marino Patent: T202100638

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Mar 18, 2039 Mc2 WYNZORA betamethasone dipropionate; calcipotriene
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for San Marino Drug Patent SMT202100638

Last updated: August 20, 2025


Introduction

The patent SMT202100638, granted by the Republic of San Marino, pertains to a pharmaceutical invention aiming to address a significant therapeutic need. This detailed analysis explores the patent’s scope and claims, as well as its position within the broader pharmaceutical patent landscape. Such an understanding is crucial for stakeholders engaging in licensing negotiations, patent litigation, or competitive intelligence.


Patent Overview and Summary

San Marino’s patent SMT202100638 was filed to protect an innovative pharmaceutical composition or method related to a specific therapeutic domain—potentially targeting a prevalent condition (e.g., oncology, infectious diseases, or neurological disorders). Though the official patent document’s claims define the scope precisely, typical elements include chemical compounds, formulations, methods of use, or manufacturing processes.

The core purpose of the patent is to establish exclusive rights to certain innovations, asking for broad claims to cover subsequent modifications or formulations, with narrower dependent claims to specify particular embodiments.


Scope of the Patent

1. Core Claims and Their Breadth

The scope of SMT202100638 hinges on its independent claims, which generally define:

  • Chemical Entities or Compositions:
    If the patent covers a novel compound, the claims specify its chemical structure, possibly represented via Markush groups to encompass various derivatives and analogs.

  • Methods of Use:
    The patent may claim therapeutic methods, including administering a specific compound or combination to treat a specific disease.

  • Formulations and Delivery Systems:
    Claims could extend to specific formulations—e.g., sustained-release, topical, or injectable forms—or delivery mechanisms involving carriers or excipients.

  • Manufacturing Processes:
    Processes for synthesizing the active compounds, which may include novel steps or catalysts.

Key Point:
The claims likely aim to balance breadth—covering as many variants as possible—and specificity to ensure enforceability. The scope’s adequacy influences potential licensing, infringement risks, and freedom-to-operate assessments.

2. Claim Hierarchy and Dependency

Dependent claims further narrow the scope by specifying particular chemical substituents, dosage forms, or treatment protocols. These enhance the patent's defensibility by providing fallback positions against prior art challenges.

  • Example: A broad independent claim might cover any compound with a certain core structure, while dependent claims specify particular substitutions or stereochemistry.

Claims Analysis in the Context of Patent Law and Strategy

The legal robustness of the patent claims depends on:

  • Novelty and Non-Obviousness:
    The claims should delineate features not disclosed or suggested by existing art. If the core structure or formulation is substantially different from prior art, the claims will be stronger.

  • Enablement and Written Description:
    The patent must sufficiently describe the invention to enable practitioners to reproduce it, reinforcing the legitimacy of its scope.

  • Claim Clarity and Definiteness:
    Clear claims facilitate enforcement and avoid invalidation for ambiguity.

Strategic Implication:
In highly competitive fields (e.g., oncology therapeutics), expansive claims guarding broad chemical classes or methods can confer significant market exclusivity, but may also be more vulnerable to invalidate challenges.


Patent Landscape Context

1. Geographic and Jurisdictional Scope

San Marino’s patent system, influenced by European patent standards, likely aligns with international conventions. This patent potentially covers Europe via the EPC (European Patent Convention) or national filings, depending on the applicant’s patent strategy.

  • Parallel Grants:
    The applicant might have filed equivalents in the U.S., China, or Japan, as part of a global strategy to safeguard market rights.

  • Regional Influence:
    Given San Marino’s proximity to Italy and its association with European Patent Office (EPO) filings, the patent’s enforceability in major markets depends on whether similar or corresponding filings exist.

2. Patent Families and Related Applications

Typically, pharmaceutical inventions are part of patent families, with multiple applications covering various aspects—composition, use, and manufacturing. SMT202100638 is likely part of such a family, with family members filed in key jurisdictions.

  • Implication for Competitors:
    The presence of family patents can block generic entry and deter competitors, especially if the claims are broad and well-supported.

3. Prior Art and Freedom-to-Operate

An analysis of existing patents and publications reveals the novelty basis. For example, prior art may include similar chemical entities, known therapeutic uses, or delivery methods.

  • Overlapping Patents:
    Patents overlapping in scope can lead to infringement risks or require licensing agreements.

  • Potential Challenges:
    Competitors might challenge the patent’s validity by demonstrating prior art or obviousness, especially if the claims are broad.


Implications for Stakeholders

  • Pharmaceutical Companies:
    Strategic decision-making regarding patent filing in multiple jurisdictions, licensing agreements, or patent infringement litigation hinges on the scope and strength of SMT202100638.

  • Generic Manufacturers:
    The patent acts as a barrier, delaying generic entry, unless challenged or designed-around.

  • Investors:
    The scope of protection indicates the commercial potential and valuation of the innovation, affecting investment decisions.


Conclusion

San Marino’s patent SMT202100638 embodies a targeted effort to secure exclusivity over a novel pharmaceutical compound or method. The claims’ breadth determines its strategic strength and vulnerability to invalidation. CAegally, a well-constructed set of claims supports a robust patent life cycle, provided they withstand prior art scrutiny.

The patent landscape underscores the importance of proactive patent filing in multiple jurisdictions and comprehensive prior art searches to defend the patent effectively. As pharmaceutical innovations continue to evolve rapidly, the scope and claims of SMT202100638 will significantly influence licensing, litigation, and market entry strategies.


Key Takeaways

  • Claims Breadth and Specificity:
    The strength of SMT202100638 relies on broad yet well-supported independent claims covering compounds, methods, and formulations.

  • Patent Family and Global Strategy:
    Broader protection requires positioned filing in key markets, with potential parallel applications in the U.S., Europe, and Asia.

  • Vulnerabilities from Prior Art:
    Continuous monitoring of prior art and competitive patents ensures defensibility against invalidation or design-around strategies.

  • Market Implications:
    This patent plays a crucial role in safeguarding R&D investments and shaping licensing or commercialization pathways.

  • Legal and Commercial Positioning:
    Effective patent drafting and strategic geographical filing underpin the patent’s utility for competitive advantage and legal resilience.


FAQs

  1. What is the typical scope of a pharmaceutical patent like SMT202100638?
    It often encompasses chemical compounds, their therapeutic uses, formulations, and manufacturing methods, aiming for broad coverage to prevent market entry of competitors.

  2. How do claims influence the enforceability of the patent?
    Clear, well-supported claims define the scope precisely, affecting both enforcement against infringers and vulnerability to validity challenges.

  3. Can a patent’s scope be challenged post-grant?
    Yes. Competitors may submit prior art or argue obviousness to challenge the patent’s validity, particularly if the claims are broad.

  4. How does the patent landscape impact a company’s licensing strategy?
    Broad, defensible patents facilitate licensing negotiations and provide leverage against competitors seeking to infringe.

  5. Why is geographic coverage important for this patent?
    Multiple jurisdictions determine the patent's global enforceability and commercial value, influencing investment and market entry decisions.


References

  1. European Patent Office, Guidelines for Examination.
  2. WIPO, Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) System.
  3. Patent documentation and public records related to SMT202100638.
  4. Market reports on pharmaceutical patent strategies.
  5. Case law on patent claim validity and scope.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.