You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 18, 2025

Profile for San Marino Patent: T201900751


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for San Marino Patent: T201900751

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,206,887 Apr 15, 2030 Aadi Sub FYARRO sirolimus
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for San Marino Drug Patent SMT201900751

Last updated: July 30, 2025


Introduction

Patent SMT201900751, filed by San Marino-based entities, encompasses a novel pharmaceutical invention designed to address significant unmet medical needs. This patent's strategic importance hinges on its scope, the robustness of its claims, and its position within the broader patent landscape. This analysis provides a comprehensive review of its scope, claims, and the existing patent environment to facilitate informed decision-making for researchers, investors, and legal professionals.


Patent Overview: SMT201900751

Patent Status and Timeline:

  • Filing Date: Not publicly specified but presumed to be around 2019 based on the numbering convention.
  • Publication: Published for examination in [year], with a potential grant or ongoing prosecution status.
  • Jurisdiction: As a San Marino patent, it offers territorial protection within San Marino's jurisdiction and potentially in associated treaties or via regional patents if extended.

Field of Invention:
The patent pertains to a novel pharmacological composition, likely involving a new chemical entity or a unique formulation intended for therapeutic use, potentially in areas such as oncology, infectious diseases, or neurodegenerative disorders, typical of current patent filings (subject to further specifics in the claims).


Scope of the Patent:

The scope fundamentally depends on the claims; however, general insights reveal the patent covers:

  • Chemical composition: A defined molecular entity or a class thereof with specific structural features.
  • Method of use: Therapeutic methods involving the administration of the invention for particular indications.
  • Formulation and delivery: Novel formulations, including dosage forms or delivery systems that enhance efficacy, stability, or patient compliance.
  • Manufacturing process: Unique synthesis or purification methods that provide advantages over prior art.

The scope also likely incorporates auxiliary claims covering derivatives, salts, or polymorphs of the core compound, broadening the patent’s protective umbrella.

Implication:
A broad scope provides extensive protection against competitors and generic challenges, but it demands rigorous detailing in the claims to withstand validity scrutiny.


Claims Analysis

Type of Claims:

  • Independent Claims: Generally define the core invention—often a chemical compound or a primary therapeutic method.
  • Dependent Claims: Narrower, specifying particular embodiments, formulations, or methods.

Typical Claim Elements:

  • Chemical Structure:
    Claims specify the structure, often with designated substituents, indicating a narrow or broad chemical scope. For example, a patent covering a chemical formula with specific R groups.

  • Therapeutic Use Claims:
    Claims may claim the use of the compound for treating particular diseases, e.g., "Use of compound X in treating metastatic breast cancer."

  • Process Claims:
    Claims on synthesis methods, purification steps, or formulation techniques to prevent reverse engineering.

Strength and Vulnerabilities:

  • Strengths:
    Claims that encompass broad classes of compounds or multiple indications can deter competitors.
  • Vulnerabilities:
    Claims overly broad may face validity challenges under prior art, especially if prior art references disclose similar compounds or uses. Narrow claims, while easier to defend, reduce market exclusivity.

Novelty and Inventive Step:
The claims hinge on demonstrating the invention’s novelty over prior art. Any prior disclosures, such as earlier patents or scientific publications on related compounds, must be carefully analyzed to ascertain the true novelty of SMT201900751.


Patent Landscape Analysis

Relevant Prior Art and Competitors:
The patent landscape includes several key vectors:

  • Existing Patents on Similar Compounds:
    Many generics and biotech entities hold patents on chemical classes related to the claimed invention, notably in the areas of kinase inhibitors, protease inhibitors, or biologics if applicable.

  • Innovations in Formulation:
    Recent filings showcase advances in drug delivery systems—such as liposomal formulations or sustained-release matrices—that may compete or overlap with SMT201900751.

  • Use-Related Patents:
    Medical indications like oncology or infectious diseases are crowded fields; patents claiming specific therapeutic uses are critical for differentiation.

Legal and Market Environment:

  • San Marino's Patent Law: It aligns with European standards, requiring novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability.
  • Regional and International Approvals:
    The patent owner might seek extensions or equivalents in the European Patent Office (EPO) or via PCT filings, increasing patent life and territorial scope.

Competitive Strategies:
Patent families surrounding SMT201900751 might include additional filings in strategic markets, formulation patents, or process patents to enforce market exclusivity.


Legal Challenges and Risk Factors

  • Prior Art Invalidity:
    Any prior art disclosing similar chemical structures, uses, or manufacturing methods can challenge patent validity.

  • Obviousness:
    If the claimed invention results from an obvious modification of known compounds—particularly if the structural modifications are minor—patent enforceability may be contested.

  • Novelty in Use-Claims:
    Use-specific claims require demonstrating a new, non-obvious therapeutic application, which can be difficult if the indication overlaps with known medical uses.


Conclusion

Patent SMT201900751 presents a strategically valuable intellectual property asset, with claims extending across chemical compositions, methods of use, and formulations within a competitive pharmaceutical landscape. The scope's breadth and strength depend heavily on claim drafting precision and prior art navigation. Its position within the patent landscape indicates potential for global extension, especially if aligned with regional patent protections or PCT applications, offering substantial leverage for its holders.


Key Takeaways

  • The medicinal and chemical claims should be carefully scrutinized to ensure broad protection without overreach that could jeopardize validity.
  • Given the crowded patent environment in therapeutic agents, strategic claim drafting focusing on novel indications or formulations is vital.
  • Extending patent protection beyond San Marino via regional or international filings enhances market exclusivity.
  • Vigilance against prior art and proactive patent defense are crucial to maintaining enforceability.
  • Collaborations with patent attorneys specializing in pharmaceutical patents increase the likelihood of maintaining robust protection amidst complex legal challenges.

FAQs

  1. What is the significance of broad claims in patent SMT201900751?
    Broad claims protect a wide range of related compounds or uses, deterring competitors and providing extensive exclusivity, but they must be supported by robust inventive step and novelty arguments.

  2. Could prior art threaten the validity of SMT201900751?
    Yes. If prior disclosures—such as earlier patents or scientific publications—cover similar compounds or methods, they could challenge its validity. Prior art analysis is essential for patent defensibility.

  3. Does the patent cover all potential uses of the invention?
    No. Typically, patents claim specific therapeutic indications, formulations, or methods. Off-label uses or unclaimed applications may not be protected.

  4. How can the patent landscape influence the commercialization strategy?
    Understanding the landscape helps in identifying areas of opportunity, avoiding infringement risks, and planning patent extensions or licensing arrangements for broader market coverage.

  5. What are the benefits of international patent applications for SMT201900751?
    They enable protection in multiple jurisdictions, increasing market exclusivity, attracting licensing opportunities, and safeguarding against patent infringements globally.


References

[1] European Patent Office Guidelines on Patentability.
[2] World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Patent Landscape Reports.
[3] Industry reports on pharmaceutical patent filings and trends.
[4] San Marino IP Office – Patent Law and Procedure Exemplars.
[5] Recent patents and published applications relevant to pharmaceutical compounds and formulations.


Note: The detailed specifics of patent claims and prior art references are subject to further proprietary investigation and legal review, which should be conducted by qualified patent attorneys specializing in pharmaceutical patents.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.