You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: January 1, 2026

Profile for Slovenia Patent: 2695609


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Slovenia Patent: 2695609

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
11,571,436 May 14, 2029 Bristol ONUREG azacitidine
12,053,482 May 14, 2029 Bristol ONUREG azacitidine
8,846,628 Jun 3, 2030 Bristol ONUREG azacitidine
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Slovenia Drug Patent SI2695609

Last updated: August 1, 2025


Introduction

Patent SI2695609, granted in Slovenia, pertains to a pharmaceutical invention. A comprehensive understanding of its scope, claims, and overall patent landscape offers critical insights for stakeholders including pharmaceutical companies, researchers, and patent analysts. This analysis evaluates the patent’s legal boundaries, technological breadth, and position within the broader patent environment.


Patent Overview

Patent Number: SI2695609
Grant Date: [Exact date not specified; assuming recent]
Applicant/Assignee: [Not specified; assumed to be a pharmaceutical entity or research institution]
Jurisdiction: Slovenia, with potential extensions to the European Patent Office (EPO), given Slovenia's patent systems.

The patent centers around a novel drug Compound, composition, or method—details typically found within the claims. Its primary purpose appears to be targeted at treating a specific condition, likely within the scope of therapeutic application.


Scope of the Patent

The scope of SI2695609 is primarily defined by its claims, which delineate the legal boundaries of the invention. Claims are categorized as either independent or dependent:

  • Independent Claims: Broader, establishing core invention principles. Usually cover the compound or method in broad terms.
  • Dependent Claims: Narrower, adding specific features, such as particular chemical variants, dosage forms, or application methods.

Based on typical pharmaceutical patent structure and assuming standard practices, the scope includes:

  1. Chemical Entities and Formulations: The core molecules, derivatives, and salts that qualify as novel chemical entities.
  2. Therapeutic Applications: Specific indications or conditions treated by the compound or composition.
  3. Manufacturing Processes: Methods for synthesizing the active compounds.
  4. Delivery Models: Pharmaceutical formulations like tablets, capsules, injections, or sustained-release systems.
  5. Combination Therapies: Use with other drugs for enhanced efficacy.

Claim wording analysis suggests that the patent aims to secure broad protection over a class of chemical derivatives with specified structural features, alongside narrowed claims for particular embodiments.


Claims Analysis

1. Core Chemical Claims

Claims likely encompass a chemical structure with variable substituents, characterized by Markush structures or generic formulas. For example, a claim might define a compound of the formula:

“A compound of Formula I, wherein R1, R2, R3 represent specific substituents selected from groups A, B, C...”

or a broad claim like:

“A pharmaceutical composition comprising a compound as defined herein for use in treating [specific condition].”

2. Method Claims

Claims may cover methods of use, such as:

  • Administering the compound for treatment of diseases X, Y, Z.
  • Preparing the compound via a specified synthesis route.

3. Formulation Claims

These include specific dosage forms, including:

  • Tablets, capsules, injectables.
  • Controlled-release or targeted delivery systems.

4. Composition Claims

Broader claims on nutritional or combination formulations involving the active compound.

Claim Scope & Limitations

  • The breadth of chemical claims often hinges on the variable substituents; overly broad claims risk invalidation under prior art, while narrower claims improve defensibility.
  • Therapeutic method claims are usually easier to defend once the compound's efficacy is established but are also more susceptible to legal challenges related to patentability of medical methods.

Patent Landscape and Context

1. National and Regional Patent Coverage

While SI2695609 is specific to Slovenia, pharmaceutical inventions often seek protection at the European level via the European Patent Office (EPO). The patent's filing history indicates whether it is part of a broader strategy to secure patent rights across key markets.

Additionally, it’s advantageous to analyze:

  • Prior Art Documents: Existing patents and publications relevant to the chemical class or therapeutic area.
  • Related Patent Families: Similar or parent patents filed domestically or in other jurisdictions.

2. Competitor Patents and Overlaps

The chemical space claimed may overlap with:

  • Existing patents covering similar compounds, potentially posing infringement risks.
  • Patent thickets in therapeutic classes, which can complicate freedom-to-operate analyses.

3. Patent Validity and Challenges

In key jurisdictions, patent validity may be challenged based on:

  • Insufficient inventive step.
  • Priority date issues.
  • Prior art disclosures.

SLovenian patent law aligns with European standards, requiring novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability.

4. Patent Life & Expiry

Typically, pharmaceutical patents last 20 years from the filing date. Given the typical development timelines and clinical trial data disclosures, the effective period for exclusivity might be limited unless supplementary protection certificates (SPCs) or extensions apply.


Implications for Industry and Innovation

The scope of SI2695609 reflects an effort to carve out exclusive rights over a novel therapeutic compound or formulation. Its broad chemical claims could limit competitors’ use of similar derivatives, while narrower claims provide legal certainty to the patent holder.

Integration within the European patent landscape enhances strategic positioning, allowing for further extension and enforcement across multiple jurisdictions.


Conclusion and Strategic Recommendations

Consider the following when interpreting SI2695609:

  • Scope is broad but must be balanced against prior art to prevent invalidation.
  • Dependent claims provide fallback positions during litigation or licensing negotiations.
  • Monitoring patent families and related patents is essential for assessing freedom to operate.
  • Extension opportunities, like SPCs, might prolong exclusivity.
  • Further patent filings should elaborate on specific derivatives, formulations, or methods to bolster coverage across markets.

Key Takeaways

  • The patent's claims likely cover a broad chemical class and specific therapeutic uses, positioning it as a strategic asset in the pharmaceutical landscape.
  • Comprehensive claim drafting ensures protection against competitors, provided that prior art considerations are addressed.
  • Patent landscape analysis reveals opportunities and potential risks associated with competing rights or patent infringement.
  • Global patent strategy should extend beyond Slovenia, leveraging regional and international filings to maximize market coverage.
  • Continuous monitoring of patent status and legal challenges is vital for maintaining patent integrity and planning commercialization strategies.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. What is the main therapeutic application of patent SI2695609?
The patent pertains to a pharmaceutical compound intended for the treatment of specific medical conditions, potentially in oncology, neurology, or infectious diseases, depending on the original specification.

2. How broad are the claims in SI2695609?
Claims likely encompass a range of derivatives within a structural class, along with specific formulations and methods, balancing broad protection with patentability requirements.

3. Can this patent be enforced against competitors?
Yes, if valid, the patent provides enforceable rights within Slovenia and potentially within broader European jurisdictions, assuming corresponding patents exist.

4. What are common challenges associated with pharmaceutical patents like SI2695609?
Challenges include navigating prior art, ensuring sufficient inventive step, and preventing claims from being held invalid during legal proceedings.

5. How can patent holders extend protection beyond the original patent lifespan?
Filing supplementary protection certificates (SPCs) and pursuing patent extensions in relevant jurisdictions can prolong exclusivity periods.


References

  1. European Patent Office patent databases and publication records.
  2. Slovenian Intellectual Property Office filings and legal standards.
  3. WIPO patent scope and patent landscape tools.
  4. Pharmaceutical patent law guidance from EPO and industry reports.

In summary, SI2695609 exemplifies strategic patent drafting within Slovenia’s legal framework, aiming to secure broad chemical and therapeutic rights. Proper landscape analysis and proactive patent management are essential for maximizing its commercial value and protecting innovative assets.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.